bigbadbruin77
Registered User
I think every player has the right to decline the Games. If a player decideds to stay home and rest, or spend time with his family. Then It's there call.
bigbadbruin77 said:I think every player has the right to decline the Games. If a player decideds to stay home and rest, or spend time with his family. Then It's there call.
So what amateurs are we talking about? Will they use university players? Will they have a making the cut for every country as long as you are not playing pro? The Olympic hockey tourney always had pro's just not NHLers. Not many have bowed out just because they do not feel like it.georgetown88 said:Their decision? I don't think so. Amateur athletes have regular day jobs and wait 4 years to have a chance to compete in an event, and they might not even qualify for the medal round. They work hard for 4 years, but NHLers with all their millions of dollars, are simply asked to represent their country and they refuse. Canadian athletes were ripped apart for not wanting to carry the flag, but professional hockey players are the exception?
If players are allowe to choose, then the NHl should not be allowed to participate in the Olympics and allow amateur hockey players who play for the love of the game to represent their countries the right way.
SwisshockeyAcademy said:So what amateurs are we talking about? Will they use university players? Will they have a making the cut for every country as long as you are not playing pro? The Olympic hockey tourney always had pro's just not NHLers. Not many have bowed out just because they do not feel like it.
CSKA said:yes not the quality of play but maybe another winner every tournament ?
That's bull. No one could stop Forsberg and only his injuries are stopping him. Have some balls and no NHL manager can stop you, no one.LuigiStone said:You guys do realize that guys like Kipper aren't going because the teams won't allow them to go. They can do it to European players because they don't give a damn what Finland or Sweden thinks. If a team wouldn't let Canada's number 1 goalie go, the Canadian media would be all over them.
georgetown88 said:Their decision? I don't think so. Amateur athletes have regular day jobs and wait 4 years to have a chance to compete in an event, and they might not even qualify for the medal round. They work hard for 4 years, but NHLers with all their millions of dollars, are simply asked to represent their country and they refuse. Canadian athletes were ripped apart for not wanting to carry the flag, but professional hockey players are the exception?
If players are allowe to choose, then the NHl should not be allowed to participate in the Olympics and allow amateur hockey players who play for the love of the game to represent their countries the right way.
ScottyBowman said:Hockey should go back to the young no-name kids instead of closing the NHL shop for 3 weeks. It didn't attract new fans in 2002, it sure ain't going to attract anymore fans in 2006.
Based on your post you seem to have no idea what the Olympics are. There are professionals all over the place in many different sports. This collection of NHLers are the best in the sport that these countries have to offer. Should we be taking someone off a recreational ski hill because the top skiiers are professionals? Should we send a local curling hack to the games because many play on pro tours? The Olympics should be about the very best not a collection of merely good athletes. That is my idea of the Olympics.sarge88 said:Thank you! Olympic hockey with professionals stinks and goes against what I feel the Olympics should be.
The best part of the Olympics for me is seeing an athlete come out of nowhere to win a medal or complete at a higher level than anyone expected, regardless of the sport.
I'd watch figure skating if there was a chance that the 28th ranked skater had a legitimate chance for a medal.
I don't care about which collection of NHL'ers is able to outdo which other collection of NHL'ers, in what constitutes as an exhibition game to me.
I'd be just as interested if the Olympic hockey players from every country threw their names into a hat and selected teams that way.
SwisshockeyAcademy said:So what amateurs are we talking about? Will they use university players? Will they have a making the cut for every country as long as you are not playing pro? The Olympic hockey tourney always had pro's just not NHLers. Not many have bowed out just because they do not feel like it.
thats a very interesting take considering your country pays big bucks for athletes who bring home gold - there are no more amateurssarge88 said:Thank you! Olympic hockey with professionals stinks and goes against what I feel the Olympics should be.
The best part of the Olympics for me is seeing an athlete come out of nowhere to win a medal or complete at a higher level than anyone expected, regardless of the sport.
I'd watch figure skating if there was a chance that the 28th ranked skater had a legitimate chance for a medal.
I don't care about which collection of NHL'ers is able to outdo which other collection of NHL'ers, in what constitutes as an exhibition game to me.
I'd be just as interested if the Olympic hockey players from every country threw their names into a hat and selected teams that way.
georgetown88 said:Ah, the NATIONAL HOCKEY LEAGUE is the PROFESSIONAL ranks in case you didn't know that.
Epsilon said:Professional refers to anyone who makes a living off of their sport. The NHL is hardly the only professional hockey league.
Really now? Are you always this brilliant or did you stay at a holiday inn express last night.georgetown88 said:I know, but the poster doesn't.
SwisshockeyAcademy said:Really now? Are you always this brilliant or did you stay at a holiday inn express last night.
You are making my head hurt. I need some pie and chips. Can a third party please decipher what the hell this poster is talking about?georgetown88 said:Did you not realize the Olympics are using NHLers for only the third time, or are you still learning hockey at the swiss hockey academy.
And thanks for calling me brilliant.
I cannot believe you are this thick but i'll humor you. So you are saying CANADA and the US should go back to amateurs while the rest of the world use their PRO!!!!!! yes PRO!!!!! players from the SEL, DEL, Finnish league, Russian league and on and on. That is how it used to be. Where the hell do you think the Russians got their players from days gone by? University of Moscow? Sweden, Finland, West and East Germany, Czechoslovakia, Poland, Yugoslavia, Norway, and Switzerland all used pro players for the most part. My head still hurts.You are killing me.georgetown88 said:Well, since you are not brilliant enough to figure it out for yourself...I am rebutling your argument in which you said "what amateurs are you talking about."
The amateurs are those who do not receive pay for playing, thus indeed, before 1998, players were chosen from Universities, Colleges, and non-professional hockey leagues because if an athlete was found to be receiving pay for playing their sport, the olympic committee would automatically disqualify them.
SwisshockeyAcademy said:I cannot believe you are this thick but i'll humor you. So you are saying CANADA and the US should go back to amateurs while the rest of the world use their PRO!!!!!! yes PRO!!!!! players from the SEL, DEL, Finnish league, Russian league and on and on. That is how it used to be. Where the hell do you think the Russians got their players from days gone by? University of Moscow? Sweden, Finland, West and East Germany, Czechoslovakia, Poland, Yugoslavia, Norway, and Switzerland all used pro players for the most part. My head still hurts.You are killing me.
the eastern bloc player's were technically in the armed forcesgeorgetown88 said:I understand they used players from their leagues, but they weren't considered at the same professional level leagues. The players were all young, look at team Sweden or Russia. The players got paid, but they aren't professionally paid or playing against real professional competition. Those leagues were their forms of University/College. Just because the definition of a professional is someone who gets paid to do their job, doesn't make a i.e. 19 year old Peter Forsberg playing a 19 year old Paul Kariya, professional hockey players.
My brother is finishing high school, and he wants to become a director. A friend of ours who organizes big concerts pays my brother to film them and make a dvd. Does my brother getting paid make him a professional? He's 17. Does that make him on the same level as Steve Speilberg?
You need to give your head a shake again.
mr gib said:the eastern bloc player's were technically in the armed forces
Tricolore#20 said:It seems like there is an argument over semantics.
I think prior to 1998, the players were technically classified as amateurs. However, most European teams used professional players, who competed in professional leagues. When the Americans beat the Soviets at Lake Placid, a lot of people said it was "college students" beating a "group of professionals." It would be hard to classify such hockey legends as Kharlamov, Tretiak and Mikhailov as amateurs, considering that they were playing in professional leagues and were some of the best talents in the world. However, it seems like the North American teams fielded truly amateur teams (although since the Calgary games, it seems like some professionals decided to play for the Canadian national team because of contract issues. Those include guys like Andy Moog and Petr Nedved. Would those established NHL players be considered amateur then?).
right - that was the whole argument when they started rolling over the - real - amateur teams -georgetown88 said:Well then I guess you can say some players who played for an army team got paid for being in the army, not playing hockey for them.