Micklebot
Moderator
- Apr 27, 2010
- 53,095
- 30,433
I mean, he has ~150 games in SJ playing in a top 9 role we can look at, it's not like this guy appeared out of nowhere.Maybe, or maybe we just saw his best effort.
I guess we'll find out.
I mean, he has ~150 games in SJ playing in a top 9 role we can look at, it's not like this guy appeared out of nowhere.Maybe, or maybe we just saw his best effort.
I guess we'll find out.
I mean, he has ~150 games in SJ playing in a top 9 role we can look at, it's not like this guy appeared out of nowhere.
AgreeI can see that he's working hard but not a lot is resulting from it.
I thought he had another strong game, had some good scoring chances, and made a couple plays to set guys up (Chabot goal, and fed Stu for a cross crease deflection that came really close)
Well he's getting scoring chances in limited mins and setting guys up for chances too, so I don't know what you're expecting in terms of awareness.He only played 10 minutes, don’t think he has the awareness to be a top 9 on this team. He has a roll, I just don’t see him bumping anyone from the top 9, he has good skills but the overall package isn’t ready for a top 9 in Travis Green hockey
Well he's getting scoring chances in limited mins and setting guys up for chances too, so I don't know what you're expecting in terms of awareness.
Most of the game we were either on the PK or defending a lead, neither is a role he's expected to play a big role in, so low mins last night isn't surprising, but it was still top 9
We’ll see, i wouldnt trust him in a tight game, his awareness isn’t what it is with the other forwards. I like the skill package just think he’s been playing in bad teams for a long time and doesn’t know buttoned up hockey yet
exactly, don’t care if he scores in the regular season, he can save all his goals for the playoffsI think he'll eventually be an excellent top 9 option, needs an adjustment period.
When he got traded to San Jose, he did nothing there either to close the year and then signed the 2 year deal he's on now. Their board were exactly like us in that, "hope he turns into that top 9 guy everyone on the NJ board says he'll be" mindset too after the signing which was already for peanuts. Then he scored 40 over the two sessions they had him.
He won't be trusted by Green over a lot of guys until he shows a bit more here, and it will come. Hopefully heats up right at playoff time
A very effective line-oHe is definitely not a 4th liner. I don't think he is a 1st liner. He is in that 2-3 range. Probably better on an offensive vs a defensive line.
I like Amadio with Pinto and Greigo.. Very effective line and were many games our best line.
I would probably play G over Z in the lineup ; I don't see moving G to the 4th line
He is definitely not taking Batherson out
Back to where he started IMO is the most effective.
If we need a goal we can be the 1st option to move up
Chances will translate to goals.People talking about putting him down the lineup but imo I have never seen anyone else have better chemistry with Stutzle off the transition and in the zone.
Just a little snakebitten but getting lots of chances
He's had no puck luck. Hopefully he gets hot when it matters most. His details are pretty good and he is hard on pucks. Better vision than I expected. He is getting opportunities. Not easy getting traded to a new team system and city. Everyone here was ripping on Amadio and Perron at the start of the year. Now look at them.Some guys fit in well and some guys don’t.
Obviously we still need a larger sample, but I’m not going to assume anything.
New team new system it's not automatic. As a winger defenisvely his details are great. Always finishes his check on the d while getting in the lane. His down low play defensively needs work but he is playing with all new players. I don't agree that his awareness isn't good enough.We’ll see, i wouldnt trust him in a tight game, his awareness isn’t what it is with the other forwards. I like the skill package just think he’s been playing in bad teams for a long time and doesn’t know buttoned up hockey yet
You dissagreed on something that is easily debatable. Id say it's on you just as much as him. They are different players. But very much comparable as they bring different things to the table.I’m not building a case because I am not the one that stated Grieg is a better player than Zetterlund. You made the statement, the burden of proof is on you.