Goodman68
Registered User
- Jul 11, 2016
- 1,851
- 1,439
In terms of time on the ice, Čihař is a similar case to Kulich. In his draft year, Kulich also played power plays and I know he played late in games as well. So he certainly couldn't complain about the lack of time on the ice.I don't recall Kulich, Necas, or Chytil getting quite as much as icetime as Cihar is getting this year (in their draft year). Although he hasn't always been the most effective presence, he never looks out of place on either end and for his age, in the extraliga, that's a compliment on it's own.
I assume he's slotted in for the WJCs this year as no other eligible player has played as big of a role in Extraliga, so I look forward to seeing if he's made strides vs. his peers compared to his play at Hlinka.
I really like Novák, but I have no idea why he should be better than Katolický. Because he plays the Czech U20? In the national team, Katolický has better statistics and the eye test also speaks in his favor.I think Novak is supposed to better than Katolicky in the same agre group. They are both very promising. Same with Tomek. It's a nice group.
I'd say, more seriously, that Cihar appears to be in the Kaut/Kulich tier of prospects. He seems very encouraging but the CHL is filling up with very promising Czechs from Hlinkas and such that seem to be stagnating. So probably some buyer beware. Plus, we haven't developed any real NHLers since Necas outside of our goalies. 7 years now without another guy stepping in. Chtyil was looking great but he's got major medical issues that I suspect eventually cut his career short. Kulich is a bit stagnated. Jiricek is too! Something about Czechs from 17 to 20.lol