ConnorMcMullet
#12 Colby Cave
- Joined
- Jun 10, 2017
- Messages
- 10,423
- Likes
- 18,369
Five games of significant plays from Poltapov:
Thanks for putting these together. Welcome to HFBoards!
Five games of significant plays from Poltapov:
Why? because the "not so expert" experts think he went too high?LOL Buffalo. What an awful, awful pick. You pass up on Chibrikov and pick up a guy who is rather a 3rd rounder early in the 2nd?
Because he is clearly a different tier prospect. It's not about Poltapov being bad, it's about other prospects were available who are better.Why? because the "not so expert" experts think he went too high?
Poltapov was a high risk high reward pick. U can’t say with absolute certainty that he’s worse than chibrikov.Because he is clearly a different tier prospect. It's not about Poltapov being bad, it's about other prospects were available who are better.
It's even more puzzling for the fact that their other pick Kisakov was a solid one. Looks like they did scout Russia. But then they should have taken Chibrikov who is an upgrade over both Poltapov and Kisakov with the earlier pick and probably would be able to pick one of them with the later pick.
I think I can. Especially as probably 99% of Russia's hockey community including all the pros would agree with me.Poltapov was a high risk high reward pick. U can’t say with absolute certainty that he’s worse than chibrikov.
we have a good 5-7 years to really find out
Pretty sure the reason they took poltapov was based on his pure skill level itself.I think I can. Especially as probably 99% of Russia's hockey community including all the pros would agree with me.
Of course prospects have development curves and even the strangest things happen, but on draft day Chibrikov would be a high risk high reward guy maybe in the top10. In the 2nd round he was how the hell is he still available type of guy. He has a much better chance of turning out a NHLer based on pure skill Poltapov will never have. The only "negative" of Chibrikov when comparing the two is size, but if the Sabres chose size over skill, then they missed the last decade in hockey or so.
Pretty sure the reason they took poltapov was based on his pure skill level itself.
This looking like an awful awful take.LOL Buffalo. What an awful, awful pick. You pass up on Chibrikov and pick up a guy who is rather a 3rd rounder early in the 2nd?
LOL again. Why? What happenned? Poltapov scored a hundred goals in the NHL?This looking like an awful awful take.
And somehow your awful take may have eclipsed his.This looking like an awful awful take.
LOL, how exactly??And somehow your awful take may have eclipsed his.
The other poster claims right after the draft that Buffalo made a big mistake by taking Poltapov over Chibrikov, who he thought was the better prospect. No one challenges his opinion. Then in September after the early part of the season in Russia starts, someone decides to challenge his opinion but all that really comes out of that is an appeal to authority and the statement that we won't know for 5-7 years who will be better, which is stating the obvious when it comes to prospects just drafted. He stands firm in his opinion and offers reasons for why he thinks Chibrikov is the better prospect.LOL, how exactly??
Even if I don't like it. And even more I don't like to be the I told you so guy. He was a rather typical too high pick based on biased NHL scouting which hyped him up for quite some time before the draft so he got picked 33rd which is way too high for him. I would be okay with him going in the 3rd round as I wrote before the draft. Based on a more reserved evaluation it is the best option for him at this point to work on his game in Russia. There is a reason he was not on the camp list for the WJC.So not coming over in the near future then.