Thank you! It's unfortunately not available, but maybe one day. I can however explain how it works:
Each isolated viewing of a player is evaluated based on around 80 skills and habits (I evaluate all I can, but I can't cover 100% each game). I also assess the likelihood of reaching specific roles (elite, 1st line, top-6, etc.) based on that game alone. Each skill and projection have a different weight, depending on its importance and my personnal preference, and I also adjust the weight of each game to emphasize recent performances or account for certain matchups. So yeah... 1000 isolated viewings = 1000 lines on my Excel sheet. This is madness.
There are also other minor scores that I mostly use as tiebreakers (age, playertype...), but most of the score is simply Acquired Skills + Projection.
It’s a bit complex, but it helps me pinpoint strengths and weaknesses more easily, and I believe this approach helps maintain objectivity while also tracking trends, consistency, and progression (and simply because I'm a fcking nerd). Ultimately, though, the effectiveness of these evaluation tools depends on the quality of the data and observations we input, and the sample size.
Back to Misa, he scores high because my tool tends to reward complete, high-floor and high-energy players. Hagens, on the other hand, may have more holes in his game, but he's elite in the categories I value the most.
Any chance you can give more context to those assigned scores versus previous draft years/high end drafted forwards?
