truthbluth
Registered User
- Feb 2, 2011
- 7,579
- 7,011
He had the lowest NHLe among top 15 forwards in his D+1 in 20 years.In what way was it historically bad?
He had the lowest NHLe among top 15 forwards in his D+1 in 20 years.In what way was it historically bad?
He didn't really do anything his draft year either.He had a historically bad D+1. Let’s hope next season is better. I’ll reserve judgement until I see him healthy.
I think he had among the worst NHLe in his draft year too, among first rounders.He had the lowest NHLe among top 15 forwards in his D+1 in 20 years.
He did.I think he had among the worst NHLe in his draft year too, among first rounders.
I kind of wonder if Adams had the framework of that trade worked out and knew Levi was one of the pieces. That's the only reason I could see passing on Wallstedt or Cossa for that matter when you very clearly have a long term need in net and only 2 quality prospects in the system.The kid still certainly has all the tools but this past year was obviously far from ideal. Part of the reason why I wanted to read that article so bad - to figure out what's wrong. Still, can't help but think how our future might be different if we drafted Wallstedt instead of Rosen (who a lot of people wanted the Sabres to draft at the time - we didn't trade Reinhart until the next day, so we wouldn't have had Levi).
You can’t effectively use nhle for an underused player in the SHL as a reflective stat. There is no point as it is not translatable to anything reliable. This was not a pick about his draft year or d+1 stats - it’s projecting his skills 2-3 years out once he fills in. Remember when everyone was dissing on Quinn d+1 performance? How’s that looking now?I think he had among the worst NHLe in his draft year too, among first rounders.
But thus why Sabres need to draft them in volume…good/smart teams with lots of picks take a bunch of these home run types and if 50% workout they are set with elite players. Compare that to low ceiling high floor “ botts” death for where you if you get lucky get some above average players at best. You need to project well but also take risk to win the gameDidn't like this pick from the get go. Do some of these small, quick, skill players make it? Sure. Not that many, and few are dominant. Felt like a wasted pick at the time.....still does.
I've been very vocal about the fact that I think NHLe is a very dumb stat. So I agree. I was just pointing it out since it was the topic of discussion.You can’t effectively use nhle for an underused player in the SHL as a reflective stat. There is no point as it is not translatable to anything reliable. This was not a pick about his draft year or d+1 stats - it’s projecting his skills 2-3 years out once he fills in. Remember when everyone was dissing on Quinn d+1 performance? How’s that looking now?
But you are acting like 18 year old players can grow, develop and improve over time when we all know that the second they are drafted that is it. That is who they will be.You can’t effectively use nhle for an underused player in the SHL as a reflective stat. There is no point as it is not translatable to anything reliable. This was not a pick about his draft year or d+1 stats - it’s projecting his skills 2-3 years out once he fills in. Remember when everyone was dissing on Quinn d+1 performance? How’s that looking now?
So, I’m not saying that he’s a bust. I’ll reserve judgement, because it’s been a weird couple years and he was injured and I’ll.You can’t effectively use nhle for an underused player in the SHL as a reflective stat. There is no point as it is not translatable to anything reliable. This was not a pick about his draft year or d+1 stats - it’s projecting his skills 2-3 years out once he fills in. Remember when everyone was dissing on Quinn d+1 performance? How’s that looking now?
Lambert can't produce at the adult level, so he can't? The same can be with Rosen, sometimes young players need time. Raymond played little and produced in the SHL early on. Immediately began to produce well in the NHL.So, I’m not saying that he’s a bust. I’ll reserve judgement, because it’s been a weird couple years and he was injured and I’ll.
I also don’t love NHLe, but just so I understand the argument, you can’t compare Isak Rosen, to say, all the high pick Swedes of the past 20 or so years, because he didn’t earn enough minutes to produce? That argument is pretty thin. NHLe isn’t great at deciding between two similar prospects, but historically, 19 year olds that couldn’t score in the SHL didn’t miraculously get better at scoring in the NHL. Whether they didn’t score because they didn’t have the skill, or because their coach didn’t play them is, honestly, irrelevant.
It’s possible. Just unlikely. Look, I explained why Rosen’s D+1 was historically bad and why that fact isn’t nothing. But I haven’t written him off. If this next year is a dud, that’d be another story.Lambert can't produce at the adult level, so he can't? The same can be with Rosen, sometimes young players need time. Raymond played little and produced in the SHL early on. Immediately began to produce well in the NHL.
I’m
It’s possible. Just unlikely. Look, I explained why Rosen’s D+1 was historically bad and why that fact isn’t nothing. But I haven’t written him off. If this next year is a dud, that’d be another story.
I wonder if they viewed the pick as a complete freebie given what they traded for it.. but even then, that's not good asset management. I doubt he'll become our Kaprizov that they were probably hoping for on draft day, but I'll give him more than 1 year before writing him off.One of the worst picks in years. Almost everyone here hated it when it happened with goaltending being such a big hole in our prospect line. Sometimes posters here are actually smarter than NHL gms.
I wonder if they viewed the pick as a complete freebie given what they traded for it.. but even then, that's not good asset management. I doubt he'll become our Kaprizov that they were probably hoping for on draft day, but I'll give him more than 1 year before writing him off.
This is a kid that is gonna need another 3-4 years in other leagues. I highly doubt Granato is still our coach at that point even tho he's been a miracle worker so far. Every coach has their shelf life and that would be ~year 6 for him. By then, we should regularly be making the playoffs and we probably pivot from a developmental coach.Lucius was my guy at #14. But honestly, I don’t know jack shit about these guys outside of 5 minute highlight packages. I won’t judge a single pick we make because clearly the scouting staff had some path that led them to thinking he was the best player available. I think this team needs some high skill/ceiling prospects and Rosen is definitely in that category. The sooner he gets to Granato the better too. I have full faith in our organization now at developing raw prospects.
It wasn't long ago everyone was shitting on Dahlin.I'm officially on Team Isak Rosen.
A #14 pick who turned 19 less than 2 months ago getting shit on this much by the Keyboard Scouting Brigade needs another Sabre fan in his corner.
agree, he was 2nd choice when they could not get up to get Eklund.Didn't like this pick from the get go. Do some of these small, quick, skill players make it? Sure. Not that many, and few are dominant. Felt like a wasted pick at the time.....still does.