Confirmed with Link: (F) Dawson Mercer re-signs with NJD (3 years, $4M AAV)

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/

dgibb10

Registered User
Feb 29, 2024
2,665
2,296
Bratt didn't come off a better year in 2020.... guy was getting scratched in his contract year and had a foot injury....he was terrible defensively and Hynes even called him out in the media on a couple occasions


Dawson is not earning more in today's dollar

Bratt earned 10.9 million in those 3 years after his ELC....the first 2 year deal was right in the Middle of COVID in 2020 with a dead cap. His next Deal on 2022 was still in a dead cap.

In today's dollars you can tack on 25 to 30% easily.
Mercer was also terrible defensively last year.

Cap in the 3 years post ELC: 81.5, 81.5, 82.5: average of 81.67
Cap in the next 3 years: 88, 92.5*, 97* (estimates). Average: 92.5

92.5 is a 13% increase, not 30%.

Adjusted, Bratt got an AAV of 4.14 mill in the 3 years post ELC, despite getting this magical 2 year deal you think is so beneficial (and hitting the best case scenario with it).

I would have much rather given mercer 2x3, and then even if he becomes a 70 point player given him a 1 year 6 mill deal. And if he doesn't become a 70 point player, give him less.

Mercer is not underpaid at all.
 

JimEIV

Registered User
Feb 19, 2003
67,557
30,306
Mercer was also terrible defensively last year.

Cap in the 3 years post ELC: 81.5, 81.5, 82.5: average of 81.67
Cap in the next 3 years: 88, 92.5*, 97* (estimates). Average: 92.5

92.5 is a 13% increase, not 30%.

Adjusted, Bratt got an AAV of 4.14 mill in the 3 years post ELC, despite getting this magical 2 year deal you think is so beneficial (and hitting the best case scenario with it).

I would have much rather given mercer 2x3, and then even if he becomes a 70 point player given him a 1 year 6 mill deal. And if he doesn't become a 70 point player, give him less.

Mercer is not underpaid at all.
I didn't say the cap went up by 30%

Bratt's value then would have returned 30% more today....just look at all the other contracts given out...Bratt's 2.75 AAV, 5.5 total in 2020 is Shane Pinto's 2 year 3.75 AAV 7.5 total today.

That's about a 35% jump

And really that Pinto contract is precisely what Mercer should've gotten
 

dgibb10

Registered User
Feb 29, 2024
2,665
2,296
I didn't say the cap went up by 30%

Bratt's value then would have returned 30% more today....just look at all the other contracts given out...Bratt's 2.75 AAV, 5.5 total in 2020 is Shane Pinto's 2 year 3.75 AAV 7.5 total today.

That's about a 35% jump
Sounds like Jesper Bratt is the one who got f***ed by his agent, not Mercer (great job Fitzgerald that's how you use leverage).
 

JimEIV

Registered User
Feb 19, 2003
67,557
30,306
Sounds like Jesper Bratt is the one who got f***ed by his agent, not Mercer (great job Fitzgerald that's how you use leverage).
Are you serious? Do you not understand dollar value changes?

Bratt did better with 10.9M in 2020-2022 dollars than Mercer did with 12M in 2025 to 2027 dollars....is this a hard concept for you?

And he got to negotiate that 3rd deal with arbitration rights.
 

dgibb10

Registered User
Feb 29, 2024
2,665
2,296
Are you serious? Do you not understand dollar value changes?

Bratt did better with 10.9M in 2020-2022 dollars than Mercer did with 12M in 2025 to 2027 dollars....is this a hard concept for you?

And he got to negotiate that 3rd deal with arbitration rights.
Bratt is a better player than mercer. Is this a hard concept for you?

Jesper Bratt had a 73 point season in 76 games in the contract year of his 2 year deal.

I believe you previously claimed mercer is sacrificing BOATLOADS of money in the case he becomes a 70 point player in year 2 of his deal.

Well, bratt ACTUALLY did become a 70 point player (80 point pace), and it got him a 1 year, 5.5 mill deal. Doesn't seem to be the massive payday you claim mercer is missing out on in that 3rd year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NJDevs26

NJDevs26

Once upon a time...
Mar 21, 2007
68,112
33,213
Even if you want to up Bratt’s two RFA contracts artificially and arbitrarily by about 30%, that would come out to a whole two million more than Mercer got over a three year stretch, big whoop - give up the persecution complex on his behalf.
 

JimEIV

Registered User
Feb 19, 2003
67,557
30,306
Bratt is a better player than mercer. Is this a hard concept for you?

Jesper Bratt had a 73 point season in 76 games in the contract year of his 2 year deal.

I believe you previously claimed mercer is sacrificing BOATLOADS of money in the case he becomes a 70 point player in year 2 of his deal.

Well, bratt ACTUALLY did become a 70 point player (80 point pace), and it got him a 1 year, 5.5 mill deal. Doesn't seem to be the massive payday you claim mercer is missing out on in that 3rd year.

Again the 70+ point season was his 3rd contract.

Jesper Bratt was scratched, injured and only had 32 points in his 2nd contract year.
 

JimEIV

Registered User
Feb 19, 2003
67,557
30,306
If Mercer can work on his faceoff craft, I think he can be a long term replacement for Huala on Jack's line.

He also has the ability to get after pucks and dig them out of corners for Jack to shoot or create.
He wasn't terrible last year in the dot with 45%. Only 265 faceoffs
 

Whaddagoal

The Sheldon Keefe Era Begins
Nov 28, 2005
11,729
10,066
New Jersey
I think this is a greatly balanced deal for both. I don't see a lot of downside for either party.

Mercer had a poor overall year last season. He recovered a bit of his form by the 2nd half, but it was not stellar. This gave everyone a pause to not go confetti crazy.

Mercer gets some decent money, and looking at breakdown, 4+ for the last two years each. If he excels he will have a strong argument to make more when it's his next deal time, if he stays close to that underperforming year last year, going forward, the devils aren't screwed either.

Very balanced deal for both sides.
 

dgibb10

Registered User
Feb 29, 2024
2,665
2,296
Again the 70+ point season was his 3rd contract.

Jesper Bratt was scratched, injured and only had 32 points in his 2nd contract year.
YOUR WHOLE POINT WAS THAT MERCER SHOULD HAVE DEMANDED A 2 YEAR DEAL SO HE CAN CASH IN AFTER HAVING A MASSIVE YEAR IN HIS 3RD CONTRACT YEAR.

And when I provide you an example of a player doing exactly that (taking a 2 year deal, having a massive year in the final year of that contract) and not getting paid the big money you think Mercer is giving up on by locking himself in for 3 years, you now suddenly don't think that it's relevant?

You: "Mercer should have demanded a 2 year deal like Bratt so he can get paid big if he breaks out in that contract year of his second deal"
Me: "Bratt did exactly that, taking a 2 year deal and breaking out in the final year of it, and he didn't get paid big"
You: "Why are you talking about bratt in his contract year of his second deal?"
 

Triumph

Registered User
Oct 2, 2007
13,861
14,591
People shouldn't waste their time. The Devils 2nd Stanley Cup was built on the back of massively underpaying players on their second contract. That amount of leverage is no longer there, but what leverage is there, Fitzgerald used at least some of it. I think $4M is a more than fair deal for Mercer, it's a slight overpay, but hopefully Mercer will figure things out.
 

MVP Zacha

Registered User
Feb 8, 2012
1,236
2,385
Kansas
q5ZGrl0J65ivu.gif

Me, trying to understand Jim's argument.
 

Brovalchuk

Registered User
Dec 8, 2011
391
89
Again the 70+ point season was his 3rd contract.

Jesper Bratt was scratched, injured and only had 32 points in his 2nd contract year.
Am I nuts or am I missing what you are trying to say? Bratt's 73 in 76 was in year 2/2 of his second contract.

Not disputing any argument about Dawson being bent over barrels but the 73 in 76 was in a contract year, the end of his second contract.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad