Romang67
BitterSwede
Risto has as many PP goals as Laine and 3X the points. Statistically, if anyone should have been on the ice during that PP when they were omitted, Risto should have been the first choice. Yet, people are more upset that Laine wasn't there.
Maybe Laine was being punished for being a -2 in the game? I don't know. Luckily for all Finnish and Laine fans, Saturday everyone starts at 0 again. This was a game that didn't matter in the grand scheme of things. To be this upset over Laine not playing PP in an exhibition game is a bit excessive is my point, but to each their own. If Finland was eliminated today, I would understand the anger more, but this was a game that has no impact in the tournament.
You're avoiding the question. How did the players on the ice compare to Laine in goals/ice time ratio? You claimed that having Lainr out there wouldn't improve the chances that Finland scored. Reason suggests that your stats would show that Laine had a worse goal/minute ratio than the players on the ice, no?
If that isn't true, what lends credence to your claim that having Laine out there wouldn't have improved Finland's chances to score?