A division title is not winning. Miller was good in one playoffs but his team still lost. Sometimes being a “winner” is more about how you can inspire your team to be better than the sum of their parts and lift others up. He hasn’t done that and all this drama around him yelling at dudes on the team indicates that he won’t ever do that.
You don’t know the workings of TBs locker room. It’s not inconceivable that Stamkos went to Brisebois and said hey this dude is a bit of a PITA in the locker room despite working hard etc.
A good leader lifts others up and motivates them. Yelling at people isn’t leadership. Miller isn’t a winner.
See this is the impossible standard that people put on players. And it totally lacks any actual substance. One team wins, that isn't a reflection on every player on every other team being a loser. McDavid isn't a winner either? won the Conn Smythe but they lost in game seven so he's not a winner. And yet if they get one bounce and win, he's a winner. It's just not how to judge what a "winning" player is.
I agree leadership and a getting the most our of your teammates is a huge factor in being a winner. And Miller does this, he's very hard on guys and demands a lot. It can go too far though also. It seems to be dividing the room now, or at least dividing Miller and Petey. But take his same attitude into a different dressing room and it could easily get the most out of players.
He reminds me a little of Jimmie Butler in this way. He supposedly quit on the Timberwolves all those yrs back. And yet we now learned it was Towns who was really just delusional and incapable of winning himself. Jimmie went on to be known as one of the best playoff performers ever and yet he never won. Sorry if you don't follow basketball and this makes not sense.
Now Miller like Butler may be a bit petulant at times but saying they can't win is wrong. Some of the worst players I've seen on the Canucks, players I said you could never win with Nick Bonino and Oliver Ekman Larsson went on to be key contributors in cup victories. So ya Miller is flawed but he can easily contribute to winning. He was part of a culture that won a division title, which absolutely is winning. It's showing up every day and consistantly putting in a high effort and preparation. You don't do that if you're a loser.
You can speculate also that Stamkos was livid when they traded Miller and they would have won 3-4 straight had they kept him. But of course its all meaningless fluff.
Leadership comes in many different forms. And even though I agree it appears Miller's time in Vancouver may be up, I certainly don't think he's not a leader or a winner.