I thought he was terrific. He'll get more scrutiny against Dallas - we'll see how it plays out.At some point this isn't a hockey discussion it's 100% trolling.
In 12 playoff games he has one "off" game and the rest he is either good, great, or amazing leading the league for defensman on top of being incredibly clutch with GWGs...
Everyone has a bad take every now and then but this is... I don't even know what this is.
The lack of hockey knowledge is staggering. The over the top attack on a player for one sub par game... Gross weird bias.
I just can't wrap my head around it.
I hope he can continue to keep it up but in a bubble of these last 2 rounds he has been nothing short of amazing and deserving of high praise.
Well...your posts on the matter are pretty emotionally charged so the wording you used in this post doesnt come as a suprice at all.At some point this isn't a hockey discussion it's 100% trolling.
In 12 playoff games he has one "off" game and the rest he is either good, great, or amazing leading the league for defensman on top of being incredibly clutch with GWGs...
Everyone has a bad take every now and then but this is... I don't even know what this is.
The lack of hockey knowledge is staggering. The over the top attack on a player for one sub par game... Gross weird bias.
I just can't wrap my head around it.
I hope he can continue to keep it up but in a bubble of these last 2 rounds he has been nothing short of amazing and deserving of high praise.
LOL! It’s so sadddddddWhen you're waiting for Bouchard to cost you the series so you can trash talk....
I'll say it now. At this point in time, he has to be considered as one of the favourites for the Smythe. Had a rough bump in game 5 and I was a bit skeptical, but came back strong again the last 2 games and he's back in the saddle.
Bouchard needs to keep it up.
If he backslides he'll deserve criticism and thankfully there are posters that are willing and able to provide that.
I would hate to see how things might have been had there been this site back in the 80's. Coffey would have been eviscerated. Young Messier would have been written off as lazy and low IQ. Kurri would have been nothing without Gretzky.So let me get this right?
He had a giveaway in the LA series for a goal against(although anyone with a brain can see that was on Foegle)
He had a terrible night against Van in game 5 that he totally was at fault for a GA. A bunch of other bad plays too but the entire team played like poo and the giveaway was only a tying goal.
The rest of the playoffs he is decimating in production stats, setting records, and his defensive stats are elite too
Yet you have 3 posters who are determined to isolate about 7-8ish plays in an entire 2 series filled with dozens upon dozens of good to elite level plays to say he is a detriment to this team. Or he is mediocre. Or he is overrated.
Do I have that correct?
Some ppl really shouldn't be allowed to post as, to quote them specifically" they have low hockey IQ" when it comes to this stuff
Do you see the game resemblance to Al MacInnis yet ?I would hate to see how things might have been had there been this site back in the 80's. Coffey would have been eviscerated. Young Messier would have been written off as lazy and low IQ. Kurri would have been nothing without Gretzky.
That's an easy comparison because of things like their shot, though at the time MacInnis was terrifying with that slapper which he unleashed sometimes indiscriminately. Remember, when MacInnis came into the league many players did not even wear helmets. Even for fans he was dangerous. There were no nets to protect you from a deflected bomb.Do you see the game resemblance to Al MacInnis yet ?
MacInnis is easily the best player in the Flames all-time franchise history for me. He was more than a heavy shot.That's an easy comparison because of things like their shot, though at the time MacInnis was terrifying with that slapper which he unleashed sometimes indiscriminately. Bouchard is more surgical with his shot. Like most defenseman today the big bomb is not always the first choice. He is as likely to beat you with a wrister rather than the big bomb when the situation arises. Neither player is what I would call dynamic.
Of course. I was not suggesting he was. I watched a lot of MacInnis live and fully appreciate his game. But the comparison between the two probably starts with their shots.MacInnis is easily the best player in the Flames all-time franchise history for me. He was more than a heavy shot.
Actually it's the opposite. Trolling is Bobbythebrain posting stupid memes, pics, chirping instead of having an actual discussion and defending why Bouchard should define all odds and be in the Smythe convo.At some point this isn't a hockey discussion it's 100% trolling.
In 12 playoff games he has one "off" game and the rest he is either good, great, or amazing leading the league for defensman on top of being incredibly clutch with GWGs...
Everyone has a bad take every now and then but this is... I don't even know what this is.
The lack of hockey knowledge is staggering. The over the top attack on a player for one sub par game... Gross weird bias.
I just can't wrap my head around it.
I hope he can continue to keep it up but in a bubble of these last 2 rounds he has been nothing short of amazing and deserving of high praise.
You forgot the Umm.Actually it's the opposite.
Actually it's the opposite. Trolling is Bobbythebrain posting stupid memes, pics, chirping instead of having an actual discussion and defending why Bouchard should define all odds and be in the Smythe convo.