North Cole
♧ Lem
- Jan 22, 2017
- 11,864
- 13,549
Even if the aim was to draft your future PPQB, it's not like Dobson didn't project to have pretty good offensive upside as well. IMO, it's kind of like taking John Carlson over Alex Pietrangelo. Whatever edge Carlson may or may not have over Pietrangelo offensively isn't close to offsetting Pietrangelo's edge defensively.I understand why the Oilers wanted Bouchard at the time. They needed an offensive RD who could run the power play for basically forever. He checked a lot of boxes.
The funny part is now the Oilers have had Barrie for a few years. Barrie and Bouchard kind of make each other redundant.
Oilers would of been better off picking Dobson ... especially now that they have Barrie ...
Dobson is pretty good offensively too though. Its not much of a gap between him and Bouchard. And Dobson is a much better defender.
Both guys are still really young though, which I think makes Dobson even more impressive.
Even if the aim was to draft your future PPQB, it's not like Dobson didn't project to have pretty good offensive upside as well. IMO, it's kind of like taking John Carlson over Alex Pietrangelo. Whatever edge Carlson may or may not have over Pietrangelo offensively isn't close to offsetting Pietrangelo's edge defensively.
He looks a lot like Morgan Rielly to me.Bouchard is a liability in the NHL. He has some nice offensive tools but any positive those make are negated by him being walked every time he steps on the ice. He has a lot of growth needed because right now he is looking like Tyson Barrie 2.0
Dobson. By a lot.
Bouchard is great offensively but still makes way to many gaffes defensively whereas Dobson is one of those rare all round guys that you can build a D around.