SeanMoneyHands
Registered User
- Apr 18, 2019
- 15,693
- 15,166
I still think Toronto should be going after him. Leafs lack offensive D and Karlsson would instantly fix that. Can't put all the pressure on Rielly (who is a #2D).
Karlsson is worth more than $5M. In multiple all encompassing fancy stats he's still one of the top 25 or so defensemen in the league. So his market value is $8M at least. Just because he isn't playing the best hockey of his career and is on a struggling team doesn't mean he's suddenly a 2nd or 3rd pair defenseman.Some kind of joke? Karlsson at 50% retained reflects his real value. It's not everyone else's fault Dubas traded for a $10.5M player who isn't playing at that level anymore.
Ottawa isn't trading anymore firsts after Dumb Dumb Dorion cost us a 1st rounder by being unable to read
Honestly Montreal would do it if Penguins retain 50 %. Heck I would see Montreal giving a 2nd as well.if they retain 50% and also attach 1sts someone might do this
Zero chanceHonestly Montreal would do it if Penguins retain 50 %. Heck I would see Montreal giving a 2nd as well.
Idk, I could see it happen if we trade Savard + Armia for picks at the TDL. Karlsson is a RHD which is a need for the Habs. We imo also need someone to take off some offensive responsibility from Hutson, I dont think he can keep his form until the end of season or the playoffs.Zero chance
Yes, Montreal should definitely add the worst defensive player in the league to supplement Lane Hutson lmao come on buddyIdk, I could see it happen if we trade Savard + Armia for picks at the TDL. Karlsson is a RHD which is a need for the Habs. We imo also need someone to take off some offensive responsibility from Hutson, I dont think he can keep his form until the end of season or the playoffs.
You can't claim karlsson on a 5x3 is "multiple 1sts to dump" is a weird angle to take while also trying to suggest Hutson is an incredibly valuable player right now.if they retain 50% and also attach 1sts someone might do this
yeah ur right rookie defenseman Lane Hutson is definitely not more valuable than 34 year old Erik Karlsson lmfaoYou can't claim karlsson on a 5x3 is "multiple 1sts to dump" is a weird angle to take while also trying to suggest Hutson is an incredibly valuable player right now.
Both are elite offensive drivers who also give up a ton
So you understand "adding Karlsson to take off some offensive responsibility from Hutson" as putting them on the same pair? Nice.Yes, Montreal should definitely add the worst defensive player in the league to supplement Lane Hutson lmao come on buddy
It makes zero sense to have two pairing be defensive liabilitiesSo you understand "adding Karlsson to take off some offensive responsibility from Hutson" as putting them on the same pair? Nice.
I cant argue with that sentence (if we take it out of context).It makes zero sense to have two pairing be defensive liabilities
If you're suggesting Karlsson is significantly less than a 5 mill AAV player, then someone else with similar playstyle and results would also be worth significantly less than 5 mill AAVyeah ur right rookie defenseman Lane Hutson is definitely not more valuable than 34 year old Erik Karlsson lmfao
Are you not capable of posting on this website without talking about Habs prospects or what