The series came down to one thing IMO...
Playoff experience
Our boys played untouchable hockey in spurts where Kitchener seemed to be the more consistent team. The battle in net between Gaudreau and Parsons was unreal at times with both goalies standing on their heads when it mattered most!
Can't take anything away from Kitchener, but we have the potential for 6 PPG players next season out of those returning. If we can shore up the net minder situation there is no reason this season wasn't just a stepping stone, but a catapult into next year!
Kitchener played a pretty consistent, close to, 60 minutes of hockey per game and we did 15 - 30. Those 15 - 30 minutes when the boys all came together showed us glimpses of how special they can become!
Draft Friday and on to next year!
Great job Erie!
I very much agree with everything Mata has said here. The stats show how incredibly close this series was, and one glaring deficiency in Erie's play which was the difference maker.
Goals: K - 24; E - 23
SOG: K - 200; E - 199
Parsons (6 games) : GAA - 3.28; SV%: .895; W/L: 4-2
Fraser (2 games) : GAA- 4.52; SV%: .850; W/L: 1-1
Gaudreau: (4 games): GAA - 3.16; SV%: .899; W/L: 1-0-3.
PIM: K - 63; E - 59
PP%: K - 36.8%; E - 14.3%
PK%: K - 85.7%; E - 63.2%
I believe we can say that special teams play was the key difference in this series. I think Mata is correct in pointing out that Erie's lack of consistency was also a big factor, Most likely due to to a lack of playoff experience, which also probably impacted the special team play.
All three goaltrenders made some spectacular saves, but the overall stats suggest that, at least as between Gaudreau and Parsons, the play was pretty even and that neither goalie can be said to have either stole or lost the series for his team. Their overall play was pretty much league average.
That being said, one can only wonder whether having Gaudreau in net for the entire series would have made a difference. I doubt that Gaudreau could have been expected to have bettered Fraser's 1 - 1 performance in Kitchener, but I cannot help but think that the dynamics of the series may have been different.
All of which goes to the issue of goaltending, and the decision to start the season with Lalonde and Gibbons in net. The fact that the team had to rely on EBUGs as its No. 1 goalie(s) for half the season and into the playoffs speaks for itself. As Mata points out, this is
the issue for the 2024-25 season.