Savant
Registered User
- Oct 3, 2013
- 39,185
- 11,888
Oliver gave them their first goal too. He had a wretched game. It’s an objectively horrible performance.if everton doesn't score in the last minutes none of this conversation would be happening
blame oliver all you want, but it's not like he's the one who scored or was playing defense
Yes “just do better” applies here, just like it applies in every other game
It is additional time thoughgave it BACK. gave it BACK. SAY IT WITH ME. SAY IT WITH ME ONE MORE TIME. GAVE IT BACK. TO GIVE BACK IS TO RETURN WHAT HAS BEEN LOST. the net result is the same amount of time played. it is not additional time.
I don’t agree. It has certainly not been one second out = one second in.an injury in stoppage time lasted an amount of time. the stoppage time was extended to reflect that. they were not given bonus, extra time on top of that. 90 seconds of stoppage time lost, 90 seconds tagged on. that's how it has always been.
Because yall are wronghow the f*** are we still going through this
They didn’t waste their own time. They got added bonus time. What you are saying is not what happenedwhy the absolute f*** would a team that is losing the biggest game of its season WASTE ITS OWN TIME. HOW CAN YOU NOT HEAR HOW RIDICULOUS THIS SOUNDS.
Yes - a team would want an extra two minutes to try and score?a team is down 1-0 and has a corner in the 94th minute of the Champions League final, and so their CB goes down with cramp to stretch out and waste 90 seconds, so that hopefully they can score in the 96 minute rather than the 94th. famously, teams losing late decide to play without urgency and they want the game to be as stop-start as possible.
I just think we are viewing this very differentlysorry but this is genuinely breaking my brain
i genuinely just cannot conceive of the mental leaps necessary to think that a team losing a huge game would waste their own stoppage time as a form of gamesmanship