Jurivan Demidovsky
#25 in '25
- Nov 26, 2024
- 765
- 1,267
Hutson another measly 1 point game.. do better.
All players have strengths and weaknesses. His was on display. Believe it or not, it is entirely possible for other players to influence the outcome.I'm going to guess that Hutson having his worst game of the season after playing like a superstar for an extended stretch wasn't because Toronto cracked the code on him but because Hutson just had a really bad game.
Not really sure what game you are watching but the habs were the much better team against the rangers. Rangers had the lead most of the game yes but that third period was insane and quick was bailing them out all game. Bad luck on the bounce goal. Some lazy plays on goals 1 and 4 and terrible reffing on goal 3. But the habs had many more high danger chances than the rangers. Dobes was a bit shaky and didn’t really need to do much until overtimeAll rookies had bad games once in a while. No big deal. The Habs should have lost against the Rangers. Hutson made a rush that allowed Slaf to score to tie the game and then Laine won it in OT. So the Habs lost two points against the Leafs because of Hutson bad play. But he made up for that with the game against the Rangers.
brilliant, wonder if nhl teams have ever thought of thiseminds me of when Chara was in his prime. I forget which team it was against but I had said before the series started if I was the coach I would tell my players to dump it in his corner every time and forecheck and hit him hard over and over again. Make him hear footsteps, make him feel pain.....wear him down
I know the Habs dominated the Rangers but Quick played so well that Habs could lose 3-4 if Hutson didn’t make that rush to allow Slaf to tie game. Dominating the game doesn't mean you win the game. When Slaf tied the game, there were less than 7 minutes remained in the game.Not really sure what game you are watching but the habs were the much better team against the rangers. Rangers had the lead most of the game yes but that third period was insane and quick was bailing them out all game. Bad luck on the bounce goal. Some lazy plays on goals 1 and 4 and terrible reffing on goal 3. But the habs had many more high danger chances than the rangers. Dobes was a bit shaky and didn’t really need to do much until overtime
Yes the way you explained it, I agree 100%. Happy to get the win. I had a game myself Saturday night and only watched the first period. My team got pumped and the habs got pumped that night so I haven’t looked much into what went wrong for the habs Saturday night lol. All I seen was Hutson -5 and that Woll played greatI know the Habs dominated the Rangers but Quick played so well that Habs could lose 3-4 if Hutson didn’t make that rush to allow Slaf to tie game. Dominating the game doesn't mean you win the game. When Slaf tied the game, there were less than 7 minutes remained in the game.
All players have strengths and weaknesses. His was on display. Believe it or not, it is entirely possible for other players to influence the outcome.
Matthews goal was form a turnover from Hutson at the Leaf line and then he was lost defensively, he had a horrible game, maybe not as bad as the +/- indicates but it is what it was just horrible.I mean your kind of right, although let’s not blow this out of proportion. McMann and Nylander goals were kind of weird turnovers, 80% of Ds get caught there. Matthews goal was from the outside and it’s a shot you give the forward all day (xgoal on that shot was .03)
Hutson has not been bad at all this year defensively but he still has learning to do against top offensive forwards and the leafs have a few of them…There’s no players like this in college….
Sunday not so great either? Agree to disagree. No, I think voters will consider his point streak far more than his "horrible" defensive showing for 1/82th of a season on Saturday, especially if he keeps up ramping up points and creating scoring chances the way he does.Matthews goal was form a turnover from Hutson at the Leaf line and then he was lost defensively, he had a horrible game, maybe not as bad as the +/- indicates but it is what it was just horrible.
Saturday was a really bad game for Hutson, no way to sugar coat it and Sunday not so great either but it will be interesting what the voters are leaning next time some good information comes out because Celebrini has been playing with garbage for a while now and while Wolf has made progress he seems unlikely to be in the top 2 any time soon.
Michkov will be lucky to be a finalist IMO.
I do agree that voters will be looking mostly at points but Hutson isn't that great defensively people saying otherwise are just out to lunch or have an agenda.Sunday not so great either? Agree to disagree. No, I think voters will consider his point streak far more than his "horrible" defensive showing for 1/82th of a season on Saturday, especially if he keeps up ramping up points and creating scoring chances the way he does.
I look forward to the updates as the season progressesI do agree that voters will be looking mostly at points but Hutson isn't that great defensively people saying otherwise are just out to lunch or have an agenda.
The voters last year had a Dman who was much better defensively and did pretty okay with offense as well in Faber and he lost pretty handily to Bedard and celebrini has an excellent 2 way game so who knows how the voters are going to handle it but any point streak will most likely be low on the list.
I think in days past some voters would look strictly at points but more now will at least look at teammates and situations but who knows how it will all shake out right now but the 8 game point streak doesn't say any more than that performance on Saturday night thus the muted response as it was Phil housley bad.
You watched the game and know how horrible he played and I'm made zero mention of the Nylander goal and yes Hutson is playing with better linemates on the ice than Celebrini or heck any rookie and we don't know how voters factor that in but it's still a fact that even hab fans would agree upon right?I look forward to the updates as the season progresses
“He only outscored celebrini by 11 points this season while playing more games with better teammates, i think the voters will remember the william nylander breakaway goal from January 18th just as much as the all time assist record for rookie defensemen”
The bold is where he lost the award and I am on record as saying he got robbed. Voters don't care about "did pretty okay offense". They want headliners and love points.I do agree that voters will be looking mostly at points but Hutson isn't that great defensively people saying otherwise are just out to lunch or have an agenda.
The voters last year had a Dman who was much better defensively and did pretty okay with offense as well in Faber and he lost pretty handily to Bedard and celebrini has an excellent 2 way game so who knows how the voters are going to handle it but any point streak will most likely be low on the list.
I think in days past some voters would look strictly at points but more now will at least look at teammates and situations but who knows how it will all shake out right now but the 8 game point streak doesn't say any more than that performance on Saturday night thus the muted response as it was Phil housley bad.
The award goes to the rookie who had the best seasonYou watched the game and know how horrible he played and I'm made zero mention of the Nylander goal and yes Hutson is playing with better linemates on the ice than Celebrini or heck any rookie and we don't know how voters factor that in but it's still a fact that even hab fans would agree upon right?
Imo hutson and wolf have had the most impressive rookie seasonsWolf should be a finalist (at this point)
There is an argument to be made that he is already a top five goaltender in the league, and is by far the biggest reason Calgary is even sniffing a playoff spot. He's neck and neck with Hellebuyck in five on five play despite playing on a significantly worse team. It's a shame that Calgary's PK is so terrible.
The bold is where he lost the award and I am on record as saying he got robbed. Voters don't care about "did pretty okay offense". They want headliners and love points.
Hutson isn't the best defensive D in the league but he is far from the worst. He has 62 shot blocks and 26 takeaways while he is lighting it up offensively. Offense always comes first for these awards. It also helps him when his direct competition has a worse +/- than him with all of those empty net goals he has been on thee ice for when our team needs a goal late in the game.
You keep referencing Faber not winning despite his great defensive play. Robbed as you say. Often as a case against Hutson winning. What makes you think they'll dig deeper on Celebrini?Sure if the voters look strictly at points it's going to help the case for Hutson quite a bit but if they dig deeper Celebrini has the better case right now but his team situation has really hurt him or helped him lately depending on what the voters look at.
Probably but Faber was also the legit #1 all situations Dman on his team as a rookie and wasn't sheltered he was playing veteran type of minutes. Hutson probably is at best in a 3 way tie there in Montreal using the same metric.
Sure if the voters look strictly at points it's going to help the case for Hutson quite a bit but if they dig deeper Celebrini has the better case right now but his team situation has really hurt him or helped him lately depending on what the voters look at.
It's in reference to what the voters did last year.You keep referencing Faber not winning despite his great defensive play.
I'm not saying that he was robbed, he was clearly top 2 but voters were obviously more impressed by Bedard's offense and probably how weak the Black Hawks offense was when he went down.Robbed as you say.
Every year is different with different players and narratives, Celebrini has already been building his 2 way play narrative and Huston has received more traction since the Habs have gone on their streak.Often as a case against Hutson winning.
I don't, that's why I posed it as a question.What makes you think they'll dig deeper on Celebrini?
That's debatable and certainly not to the extent Faber was the undisputed #1 D in Minny and wasn't sheltered.Hutson has been Montreal's #1 D as well. He is just more offensive in nature than Faber. That is what the voters like for these popularity contests.
Like I said, I would have picked Faber but I understand why he lost the award. Bedard (with his elite -44 +/-) also outscored Faber by 14 points and Faber was one point ahead of Hughes. Right now Huston (D) is 5 points ahead of the top forward and on pace to beat Bedards rookie point total. I don't see how he doesn't win the award if that continues until the end of the season.
Yes Hutson has helped but it has been a huge group effort.Even not looking at points, Hutson has helped completely turned around the team. San Jose and Montreal were side by side in the standings on November 15th and both teams were on the way to the #1 pick. Media and hockey analysts had both of these teams pegged to finished at the bottom of our divisions and conferences at the start of the season and any talk of Montreal being vastly superior talent wise is revisionist history that walks hand in hand with Montreal's rise. Montreal got boarderline zero credit until they started winning games.