Its naive to believe a team in a Salary Cap World can be a serious Cup contender when you have 4 players among the top 12 highest paid players in the game.
The minute the Leafs signed Tavares to his bloated overpaid contract 7 years ago, I said this team would be screwed as that set the mark for internal salaries and player greed would see other contracts rise up to it.
I still don't think that is the issue, it's a complete false premise to draw this conclusion. If those four players then go out and are the best players on the ice, there shouldn't be anything wrong with that. It's when those four players underperform so badly when it counts, that is the problem.
Marner six games sevens.... -7, two points
four points in nine games sixes
five points in eleven games fives
Matthews, 3 assists, no goals, in six games sevens
six goals, no assists in eight game sixes
six points in ten game fives (none in the last three years)
Particularly in games sevens, your highest paid players, need to be dominating games. They are paid to be elite players, and they needed to be elite when it counts. five points, in twelve games sevens played, between these two. It doesn't matter how much we paid them, or anyone else, if your best players are complete no shows, it isn't going to matter at all.
If it was proven, that the four highest players on the team, performed to expectations, based on these salaries, and the rest of the team let them down.. and the team lost because the rest of the team didn't score... while these guys were absolute forces... I would agree... but that's not what has happened here. This team isn't losing because they can't afford depth, this team is losing because those guys who are paid to perform, don't when it counts. It isn't the salary structure, it's that they've bet that on players who don't perform when it counts.
These guys aren't winners... that's all there is to it.