One of those posters is a medical practitioner the other isn't...so I know who I would defer to.
Ya, who knows whether the injury was or wasn't handled correct.
There isn't though. Basically the "evidence" is that the Canucks have injuries, and these injuries sometimes don't heal in the manner the fans expect. Fans, therefore, conclude the medical team sucks. But the fans criticizing the team's medical staff almost never have any medical training and are clearly not in a position of understanding to even criticize the medical team, and even if they were, they don't even have the requisite information to criticize the medical team. And moreover, even if these fans had the medical expertise and information necessary to criticize the medical team, they'd also need a keen understanding of the general standard of medical advice being provided at an NHL level....which they don't.
Of course, the Canucks medical team could actually suck. I don't know.
That isn't evidence that he has an ongoing knee issue. Management literally just said that the icing was to deal with a knee injury he sustained from crashing into the boards at the Four Nations, not patellar tendinitis.
That's fine, you are certainly entitled to your opinion.
Again, there isn't really any evidence of incompetence here.
This is just what aboutism though, isn't it?
But they obviously still believe in Pettersson, and if Pettersson rebounds, then not trading him was the right decision.