Toggle sidebar

Rumor: End of an era with Boeser and Canucks. Boeser: "Honestly its unlikely at this point (to re-sign)". Where does he go and for how much?

Gilles Meloche said:
This screams Boston to me…
Click to expand...
Hope Boston signs them. Being saddled with Lindholm and Boeser, combined 15 or 16 million dollars for two players that might not hit 50 goals combined. I rather Canucks pay 8 million for Bennett than a player who is streaky and slow, not even a play driver.
 
Its been a long season in Van...I wonder if both sides take a couple of weeks and then gets back to the negotiation table. Brock has openly expressed that he loves the ogranization and he loves the city and it has become home for him....If the Canucks offer is at 4/5 yrs and he wants 7/8 then obviosly a compromise is 6.

I just dont see how Debrusk signed for 5.5 mil AAV for 7 yrs which equals to 38.5 mil. Debrusk leads the Canucks in goals this year over Boeser as well. I get that Boeser scores more goals in general than Debrusk but the difference certainly shouldnt be 5.5 mil from Debrusk to the supposed 8mil AAV that Boeser wants.

I think a fair offer would be around 45mil....whether thats 6yrs 7.5 mil or 5 yrs 8.5 mil.
 
UrbanImpact said:
Its been a long season in Van...I wonder if both sides take a couple of weeks and then gets back to the negotiation table. Brock has openly expressed that he loves the ogranization and he loves the city and it has become home for him....If the Canucks offer is at 4/5 yrs and he wants 7/8 then obviosly a compromise is 6.

I just dont see how Debrusk signed for 5.5 mil AAV for 7 yrs which equals to 38.5 mil. Debrusk leads the Canucks in goals this year over Boeser as well. I get that Boeser scores more goals in general than Debrusk but the difference certainly shouldnt be 5.5 mil from Debrusk to the supposed 8mil AAV that Boeser wants.

I think a fair offer would be around 45mil....whether thats 6yrs 7.5 mil or 5 yrs 8.5 mil.
Click to expand...
Don’t think ownership wants boeser back. Someone has to be the scapegoat, and this year it’s brock.
 
centipede2233 said:
Don’t think ownership wants boeser back. Someone has to be the scapegoat, and this year it’s brock.
Click to expand...


LMAO, theres plenty of reason for this disastrous season, Brocks is at the bottom of that barrel.

1. JT Miller saga
2. Elias Pettersson injury/bad shape
3. Demko injury
4. Q Hughes, Hronek injury
5. Dakota Joshua testicular cancer


I also dont think its ownership that doesnt want Brock. Brock is a fan favorite and sells alot of jerseys and people go to the game for him.
If anything, Its management thats has made a hard stance on what they want to pay him with and they arent willing to budge because they dont feel Brock is a driver of a line, which is perfectly fair.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RebuildinVan and centipede2233
UrbanImpact said:
LMAO, theres plenty of reason for this disastrous season, Brocks is at the bottom of that barrel.

1. JT Miller saga
2. Elias Pettersson injury/bad shape
3. Demko injury
4. Q Hughes, Hronek injury
5. Dakota Joshua testicular cancer


I also dont think its ownership that doesnt want Brock. Brock is a fan favorite and sells alot of jerseys and people go to the game for him.
If anything, Its management thats has made a hard stance on what they want to pay him with and they arent willing to budge because they dont feel Brock is a driver of a line, which is perfectly fair.
Click to expand...
Yes it was a culmination of things, but boeser is the only one of the above that needs a contract and a pretty big caphit at that. When you have a disappointing season, someone takes the fall.
 
Fatass said:
Even taking the rising cap into account Boeser has contract expectations that are out of touch with what he’s going to be offered. He should have accepted the 40 mil Van offered; he might have to accept less come July 1.
Click to expand...
Proving that last years 40g was an outlier and not essentially matching production with Debrusk this year really hurt his market value imo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Leafshater67 and Fatass
UrbanImpact said:
Its been a long season in Van...I wonder if both sides take a couple of weeks and then gets back to the negotiation table. Brock has openly expressed that he loves the ogranization and he loves the city and it has become home for him....If the Canucks offer is at 4/5 yrs and he wants 7/8 then obviosly a compromise is 6.

I just dont see how Debrusk signed for 5.5 mil AAV for 7 yrs which equals to 38.5 mil. Debrusk leads the Canucks in goals this year over Boeser as well. I get that Boeser scores more goals in general than Debrusk but the difference certainly shouldnt be 5.5 mil from Debrusk to the supposed 8mil AAV that Boeser wants.

I think a fair offer would be around 45mil....whether thats 6yrs 7.5 mil or 5 yrs 8.5 mil.
Click to expand...
Debrusk has two more goals than Boeser while playing 7 more games.

People keep forgetting that Boeser also dealt with a concussion, that is very life changing for any player.

Gotta put these things into perspective.
 
centipede2233 said:
Don’t think ownership wants boeser back. Someone has to be the scapegoat, and this year it’s brock.
Click to expand...

Doubt it, this whole season bombed because of JT Miller's baby mama drama plus his 'leave' for personal reasons when he couldn't shut the f*** up about his emotional shit.
 
EpochLink said:
Doubt it, this whole season bombed because of JT Miller's baby mama drama plus his 'leave' for personal reasons when he couldn't shut the f*** up about his emotional shit.
Click to expand...
A lot of things went wrong, I’m just saying boeser won’t get resigned cause of the dissapoint Canucks season. Not saying he is the reason, he is one of a multitude of reasons
 
EpochLink said:
Doubt it, this whole season bombed because of JT Miller's baby mama drama plus his 'leave' for personal reasons when he couldn't shut the f*** up about his emotional shit.
Click to expand...
If your entire team's season can be jacked up over some nonsense like that, you don't deserve to go anywhere but home after the regular season. Thing is, I don't buy that. I blane the absolute trash owner.
 
centipede2233 said:
A lot of things went wrong, I’m just saying boeser won’t get resigned cause of the dissapoint Canucks season. Not saying he is the reason, he is one of a multitude of reasons
Click to expand...
Management hasn’t really been a fan of his since they got here. Even after Brock scored 40 last season Allvin questioned his compete level. He’s not there guy, they want more speed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Leafshater67, brock hughes007 and centipede2233
Fatass said:
Even taking the rising cap into account Boeser has contract expectations that are out of touch with what he’s going to be offered. He should have accepted the 40 mil Van offered; he might have to accept less come July 1.
Click to expand...
If the UFA class was halfway decent, I'd agree. It's pretty poor though so I can see another team talking themselves into him at that price
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fatass
I don't think Brock has too many options if he wants a contract that big. Who ever gives him that contract will regret it .

He is not a terrible player but he does have flaws. Bottom line is he just isn't worth that kind of money.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fatass
If Brock Boeser is a solid guy in the dressing room, a guy who will hold others accountable and provide veteran leadership, AND gets 60 points or so if healthy then yes you pay him $8 Mill AAV. Vancouver needs guys like that in the line up.

If he isn't those things, and is just an oft injured 50-60 point guy, then Allvin is right to let him walk and buyer beware in the free agent market.

I don't know what he is really so Canuck fans will have to chime in and clarify.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 3 (members: 0, guests: 3)

Latest posts

Ad

Ad

Top Bottom