Player Discussion Elias Pettersson - Please, Be Civil

ChuckNorris4Cup

Registered User
May 31, 2018
3,217
2,455
He literally cost us the last game… you can keep the glasses.
Technically he didn't, Myers not being able to stop Pinto on a 1 on 1 battle was weak, Lankinen should of actually stopped that puck in OT, even Rick Bowness thought that, now did Miller not play defensively good yes not denying that, but he was far from the reason they lost the game lol.

Looks like your glasses are on all the time, you can keep them.
 

racerjoe

Registered User
Jun 3, 2012
12,516
6,395
Vancouver
Again… lank would not have had to make the save if miller played either play better… Myers would not have had to make a play if miller played it better… they were two primary mistakes…
 
  • Like
Reactions: calnuck

thadd

Oil4Life
Jun 9, 2007
26,895
2,958
Canada
I haven't been in the loop. Just spend the best part of 2 hours going through this entire thread.

If you can get the media to shut up, it probably won't be a problem keeping both Miller and Petterson on the team, but if you're going to let media scum bring it up daily, it will make the issue unbearable an force a trade, which you guys really don't want

No way you guys are trading Miller and it's so unusual to see a team get good value in a trade for a player as good as Petterson.

You could end up getting as much value for him as Edmonton got for Hall, which is obviously unacceptable.

Shaq and Kobe hated each other, but we're able to put their differences aside and play together on the same court and go on to win 🏆.
 

rypper

21-12-05 it's finally over.
Dec 22, 2006
17,447
22,527
I haven't been in the loop. Just spend the best part of 2 hours going through this entire thread.

If you can get the media to shut up, it probably won't be a problem keeping both Miller and Petterson on the team, but if you're going to let media scum bring it up daily, it will make the issue unbearable an force a trade, which you guys really don't want

No way you guys are trading Miller and it's so unusual to see a team get good value in a trade for a player as good as Petterson.

You could end up getting as much value for him as Edmonton got for Hall, which is obviously unacceptable.

Shaq and Kobe hated each other, but we're able to put their differences aside and play together on the same court and go on to win 🏆.

The media brought it up in one scrum, after the coach and captain spoke about it pre game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PuckMunchkin

PuckMunchkin

Very Nice, Very Evil!
Dec 13, 2006
13,161
10,928
Lapland
Why is it just accepted that the Van media is some insane monster?

I really do not see it. It is rather tame and vanilla when compared to any other major sport in North America...

It is very rare that anyone asks a question that makes a player or coach or gm even some what uncomfortable.
 

F A N

Registered User
Aug 12, 2005
19,709
6,482
Why is it just accepted that the Van media is some insane monster?
I'm not sure that is the case. Most people in the local media are considered nice people and reflective of most people's perception of Vancouver. Basically, aside from Sekeres, there's not a lot of hate or controversy.

I really do not see it. It is rather tame and vanilla when compared to any other major sport in North America...

It is very rare that anyone asks a question that makes a player or coach or gm even some what uncomfortable.

I agree.
 

theguardianII

Registered User
Jan 30, 2020
3,800
1,896
IF Pettersson was to be traded ....
The usual result is the team getting the player wins the trade.
Thorton - Bruins - San Jose, tough to say but SJ - this was never a trade offered throughout the league though.
Lindros - Quebec/Colorado - Flyers - maybe closer to a tie with Colorado winning longer term.
Gretzky - Oilers - Kings - winner Kings but Oilers did win another cup, Kings stuffed the arena.

Just mentioned a few of the biggest names traded but there are many more.

IMO IF Pettersson was dealt if might not be expecting too much less than maybe the Lindros type return.

Multiple firsts, top four Dman or top six forward, 2 AAA prospects.
Not limited to that combination but close to that value.

One issue might be what managements plan is going forward, would they want say a Dobson level dman? Would they want another Dahlin if made available or Powers? Zadorov has gone on to become a top pairing in Boston or top 3 anyway but management didn't want that player or thought 5 mil is too much. So does that limit the return?
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad