Ekblad hit on Hagel - suspended 2 games

Status
Not open for further replies.
1745897554599.png


if this isn't suspension-worthy, ekblad's hit isn't. this was grotesque. predatory. i'm astonished that people are celebrating it.

i haven't seen a great angle of ekblad's elbow actually hitting hagel's jaw or face. it looks like ekblad was trying to plant his forearm into hagel's chest and drive him down. it was not a violent elbow. almost looked like it was slow-motion.
 
Like that shoulder just a moment ago that Malinski drove directly through Steel's jaw was a worse hit. And resulted in a 2 min penalty.
 
Yeah he throws his elbow at him. Luckily it was only the forearm that got Hagel's chin. The majority of the force being the elbow landed on his upper chest area. Could have been worse.

Also neither of the players had too much forward momentum which is good. Without the elbow it's a nothing push.

Pretty much the same hit as Draisaitl on Barkov last spring. FWIW.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Laus723
View attachment 1025376

if this isn't suspension-worthy, ekblad's hit isn't. this was grotesque. predatory. i'm astonished that people are celebrating it.

i haven't seen a great angle of ekblad's elbow actually hitting hagel's jaw or face. it looks like ekblad was trying to plant his forearm into hagel's chest and drive him down. it was not a violent elbow. almost looked like it was slow-motion.
None of these buzzwords actually matter in the rules, though. There is no reference to a hit being predatory or grotesque.

This screenshot shows exactly why this wasn't illegal. Wilson is going right through the centre of mass and isn't elevating in any way. Nothing he is doing is specifically increasing head contact. The same can't be said of the Ekblad hit. His use of the arm specifically creates head contact where it would have been minimal if hitting with the shoulder.

That said, if it turns out that the head contact wasn't actually that bad and it was the head hitting the ice that caused injury, then Ekblad won't have grounds for suspension either.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad