You keep repeating this damn phrase. But there is never a surplus of “bluest blue chip ELC” guys.
What you really mean to say is “we don’t have a bunch of shitty prospects”.
Although I do agree with Eichel’s $10M contract would be a problem with future expiring contracts.
bold = disagree
underline = bs, don't put words in my mouth.
The kings imo do not have across the board surplus of bluest blue chip elcs.
They do appear to have a surplus specifically to the area of pivots, with the rest of the positions a mixed bag.
Most LAK voices here do not want to trade potential of youth for Eich given; not taking a position there, just saying they do actually have the surplus if they wanted to go there.
The Rangers have many more areas -- except C, where the only guy is considered Barron -- that have ample elcs.
But ample here is adequate, not surplus.
We need to cannibalize Kravtsov from any possibility of a W to play a C.
We need Chytil for the other C.
We need Nils L for RD immediately and Schneider for RD beginning end of next season at earliest, he is Trouba replacement.
We have no other RDs of stature.
Kakko, Krav, LaF etc., bare all integral part of the roster.
After KA Miller
we have Robertson, needed for toughness
and Jones. We are not trading Jones, who was praised as another possible Fox, until we are sure what we have.
We could keep Lindgren, exiting elc->rfa, but it is better to keep everyone short term and move Lindy end of next season.
So we really DON'T have surplus.
Stand down and stop asking and stop misrepresenting.