Proposal: Edmonton/Columbus

jeg

Registered User
Jun 16, 2015
1,465
248
This trade as all other Columbus trades will only work if they can move a NMC like Hartnell as he is eating a very valuable spot in the expansion protection list

To Columbus
Ryan Nugent Hopkins, Celeb Jones and 4th

To Edmonton
David Savard and Boone Jenner

Boone Jenner is too much of an add normally but due to the expansion he is predictably the player that goes for free. This will give you a protected D man with a connection and a true 1/2 Center.

Leaves Columbus Protecting
RNH, Foligno, Saad, Dub, Murray, JJ, Jones, and Prout?? (Not sure about Prout)

Edmonton Protects
Eberle, Lucic, Drai, Jenner, Savard, Klef, Larsson, Sekera

Thoughts?
 

McSuper

5-14-6-1
Jun 16, 2012
17,153
6,914
Halifax
This trade as all other Columbus trades will only work if they can move a NMC like Hartnell as he is eating a very valuable spot in the expansion protection list

To Columbus
Ryan Nugent Hopkins, Celeb Jones and 4th

To Edmonton
David Savard and Boone Jenner

Boone Jenner is too much of an add normally but due to the expansion he is predictably the player that goes for free. This will give you a protected D man with a connection and a true 1/2 Center.

Leaves Columbus Protecting
RNH, Foligno, Saad, Dub, Murray, JJ, Jones, and Prout?? (Not sure about Prout)

Edmonton Protects
Eberle, Lucic, Drai, Jenner, Savard, Klef, Larsson, Sekera

Thoughts?


I don't mind the looks of it . Hate to part with either player from Edmonton but at the same time I like to add both players mention . We could also include Fayne for something /Cap dump around the same money to be a stop gap for a season or 2 ( 2 years left on his contract counting this one )
 

cslebn

80 forever
Feb 15, 2012
2,802
1,366
This trade as all other Columbus trades will only work if they can move a NMC like Hartnell as he is eating a very valuable spot in the expansion protection list

To Columbus
Ryan Nugent Hopkins, Celeb Jones and 4th

To Edmonton
David Savard and Boone Jenner

Boone Jenner is too much of an add normally but due to the expansion he is predictably the player that goes for free. This will give you a protected D man with a connection and a true 1/2 Center.

Leaves Columbus Protecting
RNH, Foligno, Saad, Dub, Murray, JJ, Jones, and Prout?? (Not sure about Prout)

Edmonton Protects
Eberle, Lucic, Drai, Jenner, Savard, Klef, Larsson, Sekera

Thoughts?

Not sure why you are going the 8+1 instead of the 7+3+1 for protection. Columbus fans have already indicated we expect to protect Savard, Murray and JOnes (Werenski exempt) and expose Johnson in other threads. This means Jenner gets protected.
 

GoJackets1

Someday.
Sponsor
Aug 21, 2008
7,101
3,858
Montana
This trade has no basis because of the incorrect assumption of who the Jackets protect. There's essentially no circumstance that would leave Jenner or even Savard unprotected. I wouldn't make this trade regardless of that either.
 

JohnnyJacket13

(formerly PD9)
Sponsor
Jan 14, 2015
4,870
2,561
Columbus
Jackets will protect Jenner. That's the bottom line. No chance he's left unprotected, end of discussion. Now, if you're still interested in Savard, a more realistic counter proposal:

Dubinsky+Savard for RNH+Fayne
 

Viqsi

"that chick from Ohio"
Oct 5, 2007
55,893
35,575
40N 83W (approx)
Not sure why you are going the 8+1 instead of the 7+3+1 for protection. Columbus fans have already indicated we expect to protect Savard, Murray and JOnes (Werenski exempt) and expose Johnson in other threads. This means Jenner gets protected.
This, pretty much. The protection assumption is pretty deeply flawed.
 

SupremeTeam16

5-14-6-1
May 31, 2013
8,894
8,882
Baker’s Bay
I think Columbus goes the 7-3-1 route and leaves Johnson exposed.

That being said the value favours Edmonton by quite a bit.

I know most CLB fans won't consider Jones to be much of a prospect but this kid has been developing very well. Had a terrific season last year and has had a great start to his season this year. In a poll of head coaches in the WHL he was rated as one of the best defensemen in the league.
 

Crede777

Deputized
Dec 16, 2009
14,844
4,566
I would do Jenner + Savard for Draisatl + Fayne or a cap dump (not Caleb Jones), but I don't think I'd consider it for RNH.

I don't think Drai is available at all, though, so it's a moot point.

Not a bad proposal, I like RNH and think the Jackets need to upgrade their center position, but idk if Jenner + Savard for RNH + Jones is the trade I'd do. We will have to see how things play out down the line. I think RNH's value around the league goes up as he shows his ability to play a well rounded game.
 
Last edited:

Viqsi

"that chick from Ohio"
Oct 5, 2007
55,893
35,575
40N 83W (approx)
I think Columbus goes the 7-3-1 route and leaves Johnson exposed.

That being said the value favours Edmonton by quite a bit.

I know most CLB fans won't consider Jones to be much of a prospect but this kid has been developing very well. Had a terrific season last year and has had a great start to his season this year. In a poll of head coaches in the WHL he was rated as one of the best defensemen in the league.
I consider Caleb to be a really nice prospect. I've just not been in any rush to comment on same because I'm sure that the instant any of us dare try to do so we'd all get flooded with proposals by the Lunatic Fringe division of the Oil fanbase calling on us to "reunify the Jones brothers" with stuff like, oh, Jones for Dubois or similarly absurd nonsense. And that wouldn't make anyone here happy (well, except maybe the aforementioned lunatics, but they annoy us and embarrass y'all so who cares what they think :) ).
 

ManofSteel55

Registered User
Aug 15, 2013
33,568
14,091
Sylvan Lake, Alberta
Not enough going to Columbus. Nuge and Jenner are roughly a wash (argue as to who has more value if you like, but they aren't far off), which leaves Savard for Jones. As much as I like Jones, that's not even close to a fair deal. The 4th doesn't add enough value to alter anything.
 

Fro

Cheatin on CBJ w TBL
Mar 11, 2009
25,317
4,995
The Beach, FL
I would do Jenner + Savard for Draisatl + Fayne or a cap dump (not Caleb Jones), but I don't think I'd consider it for RNH.

I don't think Drai is available at all, though, so it's a moot point.

Not a bad proposal, I like RNH and think the Jackets need to upgrade their center position, but idk if Jenner + Savard for RNH + Jones is the trade I'd do. We will have to see how things play out down the line. I think RNH's value around the league goes up as he shows his ability to play a well rounded game.


this pretty much...
 

Jet Walters

Registered User
May 15, 2013
7,438
3,181
Change the 4th to a 1st and the Jackets still probably say no. I don't think Jenner is available, but something around RNH and Savard might work well for both teams if Werenski is the real deal.

Id do RNH for Savard and a 2nd if the Oilers could trade Reinhart for a legit 3C in a separate deal.
 

UnicornONtheCOBB

Registered User
Jun 29, 2016
353
14
This is terrible for Columbus and you know it.

I still believe that RNH is the best, and most valuable piece in that deal. I think Savard and Jenner are very nice pieces, but to me, if the Oilers move RNH, plus a solid young D prospect like Jones, I want them to fill a real need. The Oilers' biggest need is an offensive RHD that QB our PP. I don't see Savard as that guy. The deal in terms of value isn't that far off, I do like it better from CBJ, but it is close. Jones isn't garbage, him and his brother could end up being something special.
 

zar

Bleed Blue
Oct 9, 2010
7,531
7,596
Edmonton AB
Sorry, but don't even ask for Draisaitl unless Werenski or Jones is being mentioned... and it appears that CBJ posters do not want to include them (and I understand why), so you might as well consider this a 'no' for all Draisaitl offers.

Play around all you like with any forwards not named Draisaitl or McDavid or any Dmen not named Klefbom or Larsson. Any offers for McDavid are an obvious 'no'. If you are mentioning any of the other 3 names it would have to be significant over payment for packages (multiple lesser players) or players that you absolutely do not want to trade.
 

Roof Daddy

Registered User
Apr 1, 2008
13,202
2,388
Jackets will protect Jenner. That's the bottom line. No chance he's left unprotected, end of discussion. Now, if you're still interested in Savard, a more realistic counter proposal:

Dubinsky+Savard for RNH+Fayne

I could get behind that idea, not sure CBJ would though. Dubie seems better suited for the role Nuge is playing (shutdown C), Nuge seems better suited for Dubie's role (top 6 two way C).

Maybe if we add a pick/prospect from the Oil?
 

tempest2i

Jigsaw Falling Into Place
Oct 25, 2009
9,118
91
Cowtown
Is that at all relevant to the proposal?

If Blue Jackets fans are really unhappy with their lineup, there's a pretty good chance management isn't pleased with it either. I'm not sure of the dynamics in Columbus which is why I asked.

If you've got a big whole in your lineup, the team is losing and management/coaches are on the hot seat, maybe the Blue Jackets would be more willing to make a splashy move that fixes the big glaring hole.
 

Viqsi

"that chick from Ohio"
Oct 5, 2007
55,893
35,575
40N 83W (approx)
If Blue Jackets fans are really unhappy with their lineup, there's a pretty good chance management isn't pleased with it either. I'm not sure of the dynamics in Columbus which is why I asked.

If you've got a big whole in your lineup, the team is losing and management/coaches are on the hot seat, maybe the Blue Jackets would be more willing to make a splashy move that fixes the big glaring hole.
There's a huge, huge difference between "unsatisfied enough to be considering a move" and "desperate and willing to lose vital parts to try to make something happen".
 

snipes

How cold? I’m ice cold.
Dec 28, 2015
55,892
64,526
There's a huge, huge difference between "unsatisfied enough to be considering a move" and "desperate and willing to lose vital parts to try to make something happen".

She's right, it is a worthy distinction.
 

Dazed and Confused

Ludicrous speed, GO!
Aug 10, 2007
6,420
3,011
Berlin, Germany
Jackets will protect Jenner. That's the bottom line. No chance he's left unprotected, end of discussion. Now, if you're still interested in Savard, a more realistic counter proposal:

Dubinsky+Savard for RNH+Fayne

I like the idea here.

Dubinsky and Savard both fit the needs for the Oilers. As said, you could likely bleed a little more out of Edmonton as the difference between RNH and Dubinsky is a bit less than Fayne and Savard. Though Dubinsky's contract is a big pill/risk to swallow, so maybe not.

Though the thought of Pouliot and Dubinsky in the same lineup (along with Lucic and Kassian) gives me a slight brain animism due to the # of dumb penalties that will occur. :laugh:

The big thing I don't like here though is the fact Edmonton will need to give up a good player to what's going to be a division rival. (Maroon or Dubinsky, neither I look forward to playing against).


Maroon-McDavid-Eberle
Lucic-Draisaitl-Slepyshev
Pouliot-Dubinsky-Kassian (this could be fun for all the right, or wrong, reasons :laugh:

Klefbom-Larsson
Sekera-Savard
Davidson-Russell

That's a good looking top 9 and 6, and I guess Khaira could step into the void left after the expansion draft.
 

major major

Registered User
Feb 18, 2013
14,598
1,669
As a Jackets fan, let me say that I think we're really close to something here, but the value has to be corrected.

This trade has no basis because of the incorrect assumption of who the Jackets protect. There's essentially no circumstance that would leave Jenner or even Savard unprotected. I wouldn't make this trade regardless of that either.

Protected spots is a non-issue, I agree. But the basis is that RNH is a better skilled distributor than Jenner. We have enough wingers, we need a center. And Savard would presumably be more needed in Edmonton.
On value, we've got to fix it up. But does it make the Jackets better? It might.

The more equal value deal had Dubinsky + Savard for RNH + Fayne. Jenner, at his age and contract, is too good of a value to put along with a top 4 RHD. We'd need a lot more coming back or Jenner switched with Dubinsky.

That being said the value favours Edmonton by quite a bit.

I know most CLB fans won't consider Jones to be much of a prospect but this kid has been developing very well. Had a terrific season last year and has had a great start to his season this year. In a poll of head coaches in the WHL he was rated as one of the best defensemen in the league.

I think Jackets fans would love to add Caleb Jones ("Little Jones"). He is a serious prospect, no doubt.
The issue is our team is facing the "too young" problems and adding prospects is a low priority. We need some key pieces in place to turn the corner. If we were starting a rebuild now it would be different.
 

major major

Registered User
Feb 18, 2013
14,598
1,669
Change the 4th to a 1st and the Jackets still probably say no. I don't think Jenner is available, but something around RNH and Savard might work well for both teams if Werenski is the real deal.

Id do RNH for Savard and a 2nd if the Oilers could trade Reinhart for a legit 3C in a separate deal.

Jackets can do that.

Sorry, but don't even ask for Draisaitl unless Werenski or Jones is being mentioned... and it appears that CBJ posters do not want to include them (and I understand why), so you might as well consider this a 'no' for all Draisaitl offers.

Play around all you like with any forwards not named Draisaitl or McDavid or any Dmen not named Klefbom or Larsson. Any offers for McDavid are an obvious 'no'. If you are mentioning any of the other 3 names it would have to be significant over payment for packages (multiple lesser players) or players that you absolutely do not want to trade.

I'd mention him. We have two other future top pair. It would have to be close to a one-for-one, and I'd need a thorough psychological examination first (on myself, not Drai).

I could get behind that idea, not sure CBJ would though. Dubie seems better suited for the role Nuge is playing (shutdown C), Nuge seems better suited for Dubie's role (top 6 two way C).

Maybe if we add a pick/prospect from the Oil?

You probably don't have to. He's 30. I'm pretty sure his trade value isn't that high.

I like the idea here.

Dubinsky and Savard both fit the needs for the Oilers. As said, you could likely bleed a little more out of Edmonton as the difference between RNH and Dubinsky is a bit less than Fayne and Savard. Though Dubinsky's contract is a big pill/risk to swallow, so maybe not.

If it's only a bit less it's entirely because of the age difference. In terms of recent years play Dubinsky and RNH alternate in effectiveness. I don't think that's the case when comparing a frequent scratch to a second pair D.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad