Big risk imo. When was the last time a goalie returned a prospect like Broberg on top of a first? Schneider returned 9th overall after putting up some pretty godly numbers in Vancouver.
Yeah its a risk, but our fanbase has been hollering for a legit starter for almost three seasons now. Hellebuyck is a legit vezina calibre goaltender. 2 runs with him could be absolutely massive.
Either we wait around for the perfect young, proven, stud #1 with a ton of term (which isn't out there), or we deal some assets for one in his prime and signed for a couple more seasons then hope to extend him.
I dunno, I'd love to add him. Only having 2 years left doesn't scare me at all. Its better than running Skinner/Koskinen or Skinner/Some other unproven goalie for the next two seasons. I also think its a better option than Gibson and his huge caphit for 5 more years because if he doesn't regain form you're stuck with the contract.
I think our board (not you in specific) has spent a lot of time bitching about our goalie situation but is also entirely too picky and attached to prospects when one comes up in discussions because either the term isn't good enough, they're too unproven, or they aren't any better than what we have. Its like we're only willing to make a move for the perfect fit (proven stud, lots of term, good caphit) which is nothing but a fantasy.
Just my opinion. Its mostly based on my gut feeling that neither McDavid or Draisaitl re-sign in Edmonton even if we do win a cup, so I see the window as the next 3/4 years. If we had a guy like Hellebuyck for at least half of that I think it's a win. We still need to shore up the defense, but a stud goalie helps with that too.