Proposal: EDM-UTA

TFHockey

The CEO of 7-8-0
May 16, 2014
7,158
4,541
Edmonton
:edmonton

Karel Vejmelka (G, $2.725 M AAV X 1 year) @ 50%

:utah

Brett Kulak (LHD, $2.75 M AAV X2 Years)
Calvin Pickard (G, $1 M AAV X 2 Years)

The Oilers get an upgrade in goal and some cap space which they really need.
Utah gets a defenseman which they could use as three starters are on IR. They get a back up to replace Vejmelka. KV has lost his starter position to Ingram anyway.
 
  • Love
Reactions: M Ace

Mosby

Registered User
Feb 16, 2012
24,153
19,852
Ehh I'd rather look at other backup goalie options in the summer than be locked into Pickard next season. I realize he could be sent to the AHL, but seems unlikely.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pablo El Perro

DingDongCharlie

Registered User
Sep 12, 2010
11,678
9,788
I'd consider this for the cap savings. I'd really be concerned about the D core and how it could even survive till the deadline though.

Ekholm - Bouchard
Nurse - Emberson
Dermott - Stetcher
Brown
 
  • Like
Reactions: TFHockey

GOilers88

#FreeMoustacheRides
Dec 24, 2016
15,099
22,533
Cant afford to lose Kulak without at least a replacement coming back, imo. Things are already thin.

Dude is a sneaky good player.
 

Mosby

Registered User
Feb 16, 2012
24,153
19,852
I think Kulak is the guy you should be focused on.

Bill Armstrong is pretty adamant about not wanting to add term on D. The left side next season is pretty locked in with Sergachev, Simashev, and one of Valimaki/Duda/Kolyachonok.
 

HolyGhost

Registered User
May 6, 2016
1,914
1,165
Buffalo
:edmonton

Karel Vejmelka (G, $2.725 M AAV X 1 year) @ 50%

:utah

Brett Kulak (LHD, $2.75 M AAV X2 Years)
Calvin Pickard (G, $1 M AAV X 2 Years)

The Oilers get an upgrade in goal and some cap space which they really need.
Utah gets a defenseman which they could use as three starters are on IR. They get a back up to replace Vejmelka. KV has lost his starter position to Ingram anyway.
How about Kulak straight?
 

smytty

Registered User
Aug 1, 2015
348
698
The big criticism for the Oilers is that their D is thin. Yet they should trade one of their few solid defenseman, without one coming back?
 

DJJones

Registered User
Nov 18, 2014
10,730
4,052
Calgary
The big criticism for the Oilers is that their D is thin. Yet they should trade one of their few solid defenseman, without one coming back?

Ya that was my thinking. Kulak is a perfectly reasonable bottom pairing guy. Unlikely they'd replace him mid season and still save cap.
 

Dead Coyote

Registered User
Oct 10, 2017
2,802
3,355
I don't see what possible reason Utah would have to trade Vejmelka for zero assets that help them in the future or now.
 

Heldig

Registered User
Apr 12, 2002
17,607
11,278
BC
I'd consider this for the cap savings. I'd really be concerned about the D core and how it could even survive till the deadline though.

Ekholm - Bouchard
Nurse - Emberson
Dermott - Stetcher
Brown
LOL, the bottom 4 defenders were all let go by the Coyotes.
 

Schemp

Registered User
Nov 12, 2018
4,424
2,840
Still stuck in Forum 40
Utah has Sergachev, Cole, Kolyachonok, Maatta, and Valimaki on the left side already. Why add another?
Get rid of Cole and Valimaki and add Provorov, but that has nothing to do with this thread and at the moment, just wishful thinking on my part.
But to add to the thread, Utah has no desire to add to the D if the player isn't a legit top 4...
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad