DangleBojangle
Registered User
- Feb 1, 2020
- 64
- 26
To Edmonton: Connor Brown(50% retained)
To Ottawa: Zack Kassian, 2nd round pick
To Ottawa: Zack Kassian, 2nd round pick
To Edmonton: Connor Brown(50% retained)
To Ottawa: Zack Kassian, 2nd round pick
That’s gonna be a big no from Ottawa dawg.To Edmonton: Connor Brown(50% retained)
To Ottawa: Zack Kassian, 2nd round pick
To Edmonton: Connor Brown(50% retained)
To Ottawa: Zack Kassian, 2nd round pick
Connor Brown at 50% should get a similar return to Blake Coleman. Your offer isn't even remotely closeTo Edmonton: Connor Brown(50% retained)
To Ottawa: Zack Kassian, 2nd round pick
Apparently these are the rules of the HF trade forum:
1) Takes no times to consider the needs of the other team - Check
2) Trade heavily favours one of the teams - Check
3) "Let's get rid of our trash and get something nice in return" - Check
To Edmonton: Connor Brown(50% retained)
To Ottawa: Zack Kassian, 2nd round pick
To Edmonton: Connor Brown(50% retained)
To Ottawa: Zack Kassian, 2nd round pick
To Edmonton: Connor Brown(50% retained)
To Ottawa: Zack Kassian, 2nd round pick
Just for the fun of it. I would guess Brown @50%+ Kassian would cost something like 1st+Broberg/Bourgault maybe?
You're dumping a big contract and getting back a top 6 forward for 2 years at 1.6Mil its going to hurt.
Holy crap man. The OP went one way down the ridiculous trade path and there you go, going the other way. Did you wave at each other? Geesh.
Genuinely why else would Ottawa do it? The Sens are doing the Oilers the favor here. Like a big favor.
Browns contract is already great and you want us to retain half. AND take on a more expensive, useless player? Thats gonna cost you alot.
I don't think the OP is realistic at all. if you want Brown your taking his whole salary with no cap dump coming back. But in this fantasy world of the Sens retaining 50% and taking back a big cap dump, its gonna cost you alot.
Sure, Ottawa isn't going to do Edmonton, or anyone else, any favors. The OP is out to lunch. Asking a 1st + Bourgault or Broberg is absurd though. I am sure you realize that.