Can we lock this up already
If you were smart and paid attention, those second contracts followed the likes of Skinners and such.i rarely make inflammatory statements here,
but i have no sympathy for EO and their Cap Hell
i blame EO for the cycle of aggressive over-payments, and top heavy Cap Hit rosters, which have made the hard Cap situation worse over the last ~10 years
between the Offer Sheets (Vanek, 2007, 7 years, $50 million, ... the first huge OS of the latest era)
and then the big-ticket 2d contracts (Eberle, Hall, RNH were among the first)
the Oilers led the charge to killing bridge contracts, and other trends which have made Cap era more challenging than need be, for both teams, and players ...
Like the trade for Messier that included $15M under the table to Pocklington? Beukeboom for David freaking Shaw was the second half of that cash transaction.You're not wrong about the Rangers in general, but most of those players were aquired via trade, not free agency.
He's used as a bottom player for us. Could his production be better? Sure. But he's been a very solid player in our bottom 6.both are brutal
Doesn't Strome have 12 points in 36 games? -6 and 1 assist in his past 10 games. Sounds very solid
Well....i rarely make inflammatory statements here,
but i have no sympathy for EO and their Cap Hell
i blame EO for the cycle of aggressive over-payments, and top heavy Cap Hit rosters, which have made the hard Cap situation worse over the last ~10 years
between the Offer Sheets (Vanek, 2007, 7 years, $50 million, ... the first huge OS of the latest era)
and then the big-ticket 2d contracts (Eberle, Hall, RNH were among the first)
the Oilers led the charge to killing bridge contracts, and other trends which have made Cap era more challenging than need be, for both teams, and players ...
Like the trade for Messier that included $15M under the table to Pocklington? Beukeboom for David freaking Shaw was the second half of that cash transaction.