Confirmed Signing with Link: [EDM] F Leon Draisaitl signs extension with the Oilers (8 years, $14M AAV; begins 2025-26)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Luigi Lemieux

Registered User
Sep 26, 2003
22,201
10,827
I think people are deluding themselves into thinking that McDavid will sign one year from now for $16m. Right now there is a $4m difference between Draisaitl and McDavid. Draisaitl and McDavid signed $8.5m and $12.5m contracts one year apart. McDavid is well worth $4m more. He's the engine that drives the team. When McDavid signs a new contract I expect he'll get that $4m again. Why on earth would he accept less?
Because he wants to win? Crosby and Malkin both took about 13% of the cap on their third contracts, a nice discount considering they were the top two centers in the NHL at the time. I honestly think we'll see McDavid taking $14-16M. Draisaitl was massively underpaid his last contract so I can understand him not taking a discount this time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AuroraBorealis

Rubi

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jan 9, 2009
16,426
10,898
Overlooking the Sheep River
Does the article mention the taxes in Florida? If not, it's a useless article.

What's the income tax in Alberta?

Uh, ya income tax is a thing...

I would have hoped you knew about this Rubi.
If a player is being paid $10m, that's what it costs the team whether that player is in Florida or Alberta. There's no tax advantage for the team. That's a myth about players taking less because they're in Florida. If they are worth $10m in Alberta then that's what they are worth in Florida and that's what they'll ask for... unless they give the team a discount because they want to lower the financial burden on the team... and that can be done in either location. Players like Tkachuk, Barkov, and Reinhart did that. I expect Bennett will do that too.
Only RNH did that on the Oilers when it came to signing that $41m long term contract.. Draisaitl took as much as he figured he could squeeze out of the team when he signed that $112m contract. He likely would have asked for the same amount from Florida. Nurse did the same thing and I expect that's what Bouchard and McDavid will do too. Although McDavid might take a token few dollars less because he really wants to win a cup but by the the time he signs, any discount he gives will be a drop in the bucket.
 
  • Like
Reactions: behemolari

Skolman

Registered User
Feb 16, 2018
10,219
9,580
Manitoba
If a player is being paid $10m, that's what it costs the team whether that player is in Florida or Alberta. There's no tax advantage for the team. That's a myth about players taking less because they're in Florida. If they are worth $10m in Alberta then that's what they are worth in Florida and that's what they'll ask for... unless they give the team a discount because they want to lower the financial burden on the team... and that can be done in either location. Players like Tkachuk, Barkov, and Reinhart did that. I expect Bennett will do that too.
Only RNH did that on the Oilers when it came to signing that $41m long term contract.. Draisaitl took as much as he figured he could squeeze out of the team when he signed that $112m contract. He likely would have asked for the same amount from Florida. Nurse did the same thing and I expect that's what Bouchard and McDavid will do too. Although McDavid might take a token few dollars less because he really wants to win a cup but by the the time he signs, any discount he gives will be a drop in the bucket.
You genuinely believe this...?
 

D1az

Registered User
Oct 29, 2009
1,403
744
Finland
I think this is a fair deal.
What makes Edmonton's situation is problematic is the one obvious albatross which is Nurse's contact.
That in itself burdens the team directly being overpriced like h-, and is also a mental note for everyone that no team friendly deals are on the table.
 

Rubi

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jan 9, 2009
16,426
10,898
Overlooking the Sheep River
That's not what we are talking about at all.
$10m income in Alberta is TAXED differently than in Florida.
So what? If a player is offered $10m in Edmonton, Florida if they want the player is going to offer $10m too. They aren't going to say "we want you on our team but we are only going to pay you $9m because you pay less tax in Florida." It will cost either team owner $10m for the player.
 

Rubi

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jan 9, 2009
16,426
10,898
Overlooking the Sheep River
Because he wants to win? Crosby and Malkin both took about 13% of the cap on their third contracts, a nice discount considering they were the top two centers in the NHL at the time. I honestly think we'll see McDavid taking $14-16M. Draisaitl was massively underpaid his last contract so I can understand him not taking a discount this time.
Did you just come home from the bar when you typed this?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: behemolari

bucks_oil

Registered User
Aug 25, 2005
8,763
5,147
What cap number did you use for 2025 to get this percentage jump? I honestly didn't know the 2025 cap had been released?

In 2024, today, he makes 8.5.

In 2025, he gets his new salary. So what is the cap in 2025?

This is a good and often underappreciated comment. Until we know the 2025 cap, we are still comparing apples and oranges.

Drai's contract is likely to fall into 15.3% range by the time it is actually active. That's exactly what MacKinnon was at when his extension activated.
 

bucks_oil

Registered User
Aug 25, 2005
8,763
5,147
If a player is being paid $10m, that's what it costs the team whether that player is in Florida or Alberta. There's no tax advantage for the team. That's a myth about players taking less because they're in Florida. If they are worth $10m in Alberta then that's what they are worth in Florida and that's what they'll ask for... unless they give the team a discount because they want to lower the financial burden on the team... and that can be done in either location. Players like Tkachuk, Barkov, and Reinhart did that. I expect Bennett will do that too.
Only RNH did that on the Oilers when it came to signing that $41m long term contract.. Draisaitl took as much as he figured he could squeeze out of the team when he signed that $112m contract. He likely would have asked for the same amount from Florida. Nurse did the same thing and I expect that's what Bouchard and McDavid will do too. Although McDavid might take a token few dollars less because he really wants to win a cup but by the the time he signs, any discount he gives will be a drop in the bucket.

Lol... this is either hopelessly naive, or deliberately obtuse.

You must be right... ALL of the Florida stars took "discounts" because of course players do not factor in their take-home earnings when agreeing to contracts. After all, they can't afford any tax advice. Ohtani didn't think about taxes either... players just aren't smart enough to consider these angles at all.

OR...

The Real World. Come join us Rubi.

So what? If a player is offered $10m in Edmonton, Florida if they want the player is going to offer $10m too. They aren't going to say "we want you on our team but we are only going to pay you $9m because you pay less tax in Florida." It will cost either team owner $10m for the player.

What? Are you... what??!!

You honestly don't believe this do you?

I mean don't take my word for it... maybe an NHL GM, an NHL player and an NHL player's tax advisor might convince you... NHL free agency shows teams in states with no income tax have an advantage

Then again, likely not.
 
Last edited:

Three On Zero

HF Designated Parking Instructor
Sponsor
Oct 9, 2012
32,773
31,704
Games are paid based on where you play. 41 games a year you'll be paying your home state income tax. The other 41 will be based on where game ins played. So I did a calculation on what that actually amounts to. For example, Dallas players (no state tax) would still pay tax based on away games.

EDIT June 13th:
See post #463 by user CDN24 in which they explains Montreal being a little different than others. Their overall number should be slightly lower/better than OTT/TOR. The sheet below does not reflect that change, so keep that in mind.

Tax %2 Million5 Million10 Million15 Million
Dallas2.79%$55,800$139,500$279,000$418,500
Nashville2.79%$55,800$139,500$279,000$418,500
Florida3.18%$63,600$159,000$318,000$477,000
Tampa Bay3.18%$63,600$159,000$318,000$477,000
Vegas3.50%$70,000$175,000$350,000$525,000
Philadelphia4.33%$86,600$216,500$433,000$649,500
Pittsburgh4.33%$86,600$216,500$433,000$649,500
Colorado4.59%$91,800$229,500$459,000$688,500
Utah4.69%$93,800$234,500$469,000$703,500
St.Louis4.72%$94,400$236,000$472,000$708,000
Chicago4.82%$96,400$241,000$482,000$723,000
Carolina4.92%$98,400$246,000$492,000$738,000
Detroit4.92%$98,400$246,000$492,000$738,000
Columbus5.51%$110,200$275,500$551,000$826,500
Seattle6.37%$127,400$318,500$637,000$955,500
Minnesota6.83%$136,600$341,500$683,000$1,024,500
Boston6.87%$137,400$343,500$687,000$1,030,500
Ottawa6.94%$138,800$347,000$694,000$1,041,000
Toronto6.94%$138,800$347,000$694,000$1,041,000
New Jersey7.48%$149,600$374,000$748,000$1,122,000
New York I7.54%$150,800$377,000$754,000$1,131,000
New York R7.54%$150,800$377,000$754,000$1,131,000
Washington7.54%$150,800$377,000$754,000$1,131,000
Buffalo7.65%$153,000$382,500$765,000$1,147,500
Calgary8.01%$160,200$400,500$801,000$1,201,500
Edmonton8.01%$160,200$400,500$801,000$1,201,500
Winnipeg8.28%$165,600$414,000$828,000$1,242,000
Anaheim8.95%$179,000$447,500$895,000$1,342,500
Los Angeles8.95%$179,000$447,500$895,000$1,342,500
San Jose8.95%$179,000$447,500$895,000$1,342,500
Vancouver10.26%$205,200$513,000$1,026,000$1,539,000
Montreal12.10%$242,000$605,000$1,210,000$1,815,000


Note:
USA federal tax is 37%, where as in Canada it's 33%. For this reason, I lowered the Canadian teams taxes by 4% to make up the difference. Keep in mind the table below is just State taxes, so players still need to pay way more taxes than that - but this is a half-decent representation of the difference from one team to another, as federal is across the board.

Below is the full table if you want to see the more in-depth numbers. I added some more notes under it as well.
Home (41)Division (13)In-Conf (12)Out-Conf (16)Average2 Million5 Million10 Million15 Million
Anaheim13.30%10.68%7.96%7.20%8.95%$179,000$447,500$895,000$1,342,500
Boston9.00%8.03%7.20%7.96%6.87%$137,400$343,500$687,000$1,030,500
Buffalo10.90%8.03%7.20%7.96%7.65%$153,000$382,500$765,000$1,147,500
Calgary11.00%10.68%7.96%7.20%8.01%$160,200$400,500$801,000$1,201,500
Carolina4.50%7.20%7.20%7.96%4.92%$98,400$246,000$492,000$738,000
Chicago4.95%5.24%7.96%7.20%4.82%$96,400$241,000$482,000$723,000
Colorado4.40%5.24%7.96%7.20%4.59%$91,800$229,500$459,000$688,500
Columbus3.50%7.20%7.20%7.96%5.51%$110,200$275,500$551,000$826,500
Dallas0.00%5.24%7.96%7.20%2.79%$55,800$139,500$279,000$418,500
Detroit4.25%8.03%7.20%7.96%4.92%$98,400$246,000$492,000$738,000
Edmonton11.00%10.68%7.96%7.20%8.01%$160,200$400,500$801,000$1,201,500
Florida0.00%8.03%7.20%7.96%3.18%$63,600$159,000$318,000$477,000
Los Angeles13.30%10.68%7.96%7.20%8.95%$179,000$447,500$895,000$1,342,500
Minnesota9.85%5.24%7.96%7.20%6.83%$136,600$341,500$683,000$1,024,500
Montreal21.75%8.03%7.20%7.96%12.10%$242,000$605,000$1,210,000$1,815,000
Nashville0.00%5.24%7.96%7.20%2.79%$55,800$139,500$279,000$418,500
New Jersey10.75%7.20%7.20%7.96%7.48%$149,600$374,000$748,000$1,122,000
New York I10.90%7.20%7.20%7.96%7.54%$150,800$377,000$754,000$1,131,000
New York R10.90%7.20%7.20%7.96%7.54%$150,800$377,000$754,000$1,131,000
Ottawa9.16%8.03%7.20%7.96%6.94%$138,800$347,000$694,000$1,041,000
Philadelphia3.07%7.20%7.20%7.96%4.33%$86,600$216,500$433,000$649,500
Pittsburgh3.07%7.20%7.20%7.96%4.33%$86,600$216,500$433,000$649,500
San Jose13.30%10.68%7.96%7.20%8.95%$179,000$447,500$895,000$1,342,500
Seattle7.00%10.68%7.96%7.20%6.37%$127,400$318,500$637,000$955,500
St.Louis4.70%5.24%7.96%7.20%4.72%$94,400$236,000$472,000$708,000
Tampa Bay0.00%8.03%7.20%7.96%3.18%$63,600$159,000$318,000$477,000
Toronto9.16%8.03%7.20%7.96%6.94%$138,800$347,000$694,000$1,041,000
Utah4.65%5.24%7.96%7.20%4.69%$93,800$234,500$469,000$703,500
Vancouver16.50%10.68%7.96%7.20%10.26%$205,200$513,000$1,026,000$1,539,000
Vegas0.00%10.68%7.96%7.20%3.50%$70,000$175,000$350,000$525,000
Washington10.90%7.20%7.20%7.96%7.54%$150,800$377,000$754,000$1,131,000
Winnipeg13.40%5.24%7.96%7.20%8.28%$165,600$414,000$828,000$1,242,000

Some notes:
- Home tax numbers taken from Turbotax.

- I realise this isn't perfect. For example, single people pay a different rate vs married with children. That and this is based on their entire income, but the first ~200k is often in a lower bracket. It's just a rough guide.

- Schedules are based on 41 home games, 13 divisional games, 12 inner-conference games, and 16 outer-conference games. The 'average' tax column is based on this (41xHome + 13xDiv + 12xIn + 16xOut)

- Other average such as 'Division' is just an average of every team in that category.

Lol... this is either hopelessly naive, or deliberately obtuse.

You must be right... ALL of the Florida stars took "discounts" because of course players do not factor in their take-home earnings when agreeing to contracts. After all, they can't afford any tax advice. Ohtani didn't think about taxes either... players just aren't smart enough to consider these angles at all.

OR...

The Real World. Come join us Rubi.



What? Are you... what??!!

You honestly don't believe this do you?

I mean don't take my word for it... maybe an NHL GM, an NHL player and an NHL player's tax advisor might convince you... NHL free agency shows teams in states with no income tax have an advantage

Then again, likely not.
 

ManofSteel55

Registered User
Aug 15, 2013
33,568
14,091
Sylvan Lake, Alberta
So what? If a player is offered $10m in Edmonton, Florida if they want the player is going to offer $10m too. They aren't going to say "we want you on our team but we are only going to pay you $9m because you pay less tax in Florida." It will cost either team owner $10m for the player.
Do you honestly believe that it doesn't make a difference? If a team can show that the player will make a few hundred thousand more per year AFTER TAX, then that is a big deal to players, and is absolutely and edge for teams in states with lower income tax rates.

Take Tkachuk for example. He signed an 8 year, 76 million dollar deal. In Florida, he has no state income tax, so he only has to worry about the federal income tax rate (37% I believe)

If he had stayed in Calgary, he would be paying the federal income tax AND provincial tax. It doesn't make a difference to the owner, as you said, 9.5M is 9.5M, but it makes a difference to the player, as their take-home amount in Florida would be more.
 

PuckG

Registered User
Feb 26, 2015
4,368
6,241
But still no win. Which is the only thing that matters.
Context matters with the garbage comparison you used. If the Leafs had any semblance of post-season success, they wouldn’t be in the situation they are currently in.
 

sena

Registered User
Jul 3, 2024
135
87
you all think owners want to sign up to spend more on players to add to the fact that these same owners also pay more taxes on profits.

good luck

so do people that sign in low tax states get an adjustment if they are traded to make up for the tax increase then?
 
Last edited:

Yuke

Registered User
Jan 15, 2020
645
385
Oh an by the way, do you really expect Oilers would be playing in finals had they faced healthy Canucks these playoffs?
Before you toss out this question, remember Kane was playing injured and Henrique was not playing
 

AM

Registered User
Nov 22, 2004
8,703
2,742
Edmonton
Because he wants to win? Crosby and Malkin both took about 13% of the cap on their third contracts, a nice discount considering they were the top two centers in the NHL at the time. I honestly think we'll see McDavid taking $14-16M. Draisaitl was massively underpaid his last contract so I can understand him not taking a discount this time.
It all comes down to what the cap is.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad