Eddie Olczyk or Joe Micheletti

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates

Who would you rather have as Rangers color analyst on MSG?

  • Eddie Olczyk

    Votes: 32 34.4%
  • Joe Micheletti

    Votes: 62 66.7%

  • Total voters
    93
Joe's fine. Honestly at this point he has to do a lot of carrying Sam--correcting him on players, what the call on the ice was, what has actually happened, etc. So he's doing color and also trying to gracefully and respectfully cover for Sam who is several steps behind at this point.
 
Sam is a legend, so he's going out on his shield. But he's been horrible for a while now.

Joe, I didn't like his addition when they hired him, so him going would be addition by subtraction.

Felt this way for a few years now, but both need to go.
 
Eddie O and Mike Emrick formed the best 1-2 broadcast duo in sports for a decade - and I didn’t care for Emrick.

Joe M is an msg shill

Get me Eddie O
 
  • Like
Reactions: CasusBelli
Love Eddie as a commentator. His skew on national broadcasts is easily remediable.

Vally.

100%

/thread
Very insightful but I can’t stand the way he speaks. That upward inflection that makes every statement sound like a question drives me nuts.
 
When JD left in 2006, MSG Network spoke with Olczyk about replacing JD. Olczyk took the Hawks analyst position. MSG moved Joe from the Islanders to the Rangers broadcast.
 
Much more worried about the future of the play-by-play position. I hope Sam stays as long as possible, but I have my eyes on Brendan Burke to replace him
 
Man if I could get anyone to the NYR broadcast it'd be Razor, but he'll never leave Dallas.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad