GDT: - ECSF: Game 5 - Washington Capitals vs Carolina Hurricanes, 7pm ET, TNT | Page 9 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

GDT: ECSF: Game 5 - Washington Capitals vs Carolina Hurricanes, 7pm ET, TNT

Status
Not open for further replies.
Zeebra or zebra…both the same.

But seriously though: the linesman would not able to call a game in case of injury?
What is their skill set, then?

The linesman's "official" duties are mostly limited to making calls for icing, offside, and conducting faceoffs. They can also blow the play dead for things like the puck going out of play or an injured player, and report infractions that would be worthy of a major, game misconduct, match (and double minor I think) to the referee at the next natural stoppage. Their "unofficial" duties are to discourage altercations and intervene when they do happen.

To answer what I think you might have been getting at, if for some reason both referees are incapacitated during a game, the two remaining linesmen will run the two-official system (role of a linesman and referee combined). The playoffs have a reserve official present at each game (normally a referee) to mitigate this possibility, who will enter the game if an official becomes incapacitated - but will take on the same role (earlier this year one of the linesmen left the game and was replaced by Wes McCauley acting as a linesman). In the regular season, there isn't a reserve official, so they just finish the game with whoever's left if someone goes down. Only in the specific case that both referees are incapacitated does someone who's normally a linesman get to assume the duties normally handled by a referee.

They also get paid less. You can identify them easily since they're the ones without the orange armbands.
 
I assume Boourns is hangin them up after the season. I think Staal does too if they win the cup, at 37 not sure an extra 2.6 mill for 2 years is worth his trouble but we'll see
 
  • Like
Reactions: Summer Rose
Game 5s when the road team is up 3-1 in series tend to often be some of the best games of playoff series. You rarely see the team up 3-1 truly run away with those games
 
  • Like
Reactions: Summer Rose
I assume Boourns is hangin them up after the season. I think Staal does too if they win the cup, at 37 not sure an extra 2.6 mill for 2 years is worth his trouble but we'll see
I think Burns wants to make a run at the consecutive game streak. I don't think he will be in Carolina next year. Somewhere as a lower pairing mentor for a young D core makes sense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Summer Rose
Yeah I have no problem with getting the call right by using replay if a goal was scored on a rush, but if the puck has been in the zone for 5 seconds or more then there should be no ability to challenge. Also implement a time limit on video review. Those things would help. Such a downer when fans get excited for a goal, only to find out the goal is disallowed because there was offside way before the goal was scored.
Tbh it should be the way it is. The NHL is awful with gray areas like goalie interference. Imagine they deciding if offsides affected a goal. Also that review took like 3 seconds but otherwise I agree
 
  • Like
Reactions: Summer Rose
They never should have made the trade unless he came signed.

Carolina management probably felt there was no chance he would not sign. Team is pretty solid and conference is not exactly daunting at the moment outside of 2-3 teams. Just think the team style of play turned him off. He did not want to play in that system
 
  • Like
Reactions: Summer Rose
Tbh it should be the way it is. The NHL is awful with gray areas like goalie interference. Imagine they deciding if offsides affected a goal. Also that review took like 3 seconds but otherwise I agree

Yeah, I can't imagine adding caveats to the offside review that make it more convoluted, as clunky as it is.

"Only call it back if it affected a goal" = define "affected a goal" (fun... not)
"Put a time limit on reviews" = whoops, they ran out of time on the review even though it later gets found out to be obviously the wrong call (fun... not)
"Only allow it to be called back if it's within 10 seconds of the zone entry" = whoops, now we'll have close calls about whether the goal went in 9.9 seconds later or 10.1 seconds later, which we'll have to review in addition to whether it was even offside in the first place or not

I don't like any of those and think they're worse than the current rule.
 
  • Like
Reactions: atlanticobserver
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad