HoliksGhost
Registered User
- Oct 24, 2007
- 3,014
- 2,258
Mental and physical fatigue. Cup winners find a way to overcome both. The table is set, watcha gonna do ?
Hardest trophy to win for this reason and many others.Mental and physical fatigue. Cup winners find a way to overcome both. The table is set, watcha gonna do ?
Yeah what is up with that? Our guys never lift the puck in close to the blue paint. I don’t get it.Also even though Meier, Bratt, and Nico didn't score in the first series, they were getting opportunities - this just hasn't been the case against Carolina so far. Bratt had the best chance of the night last night, I thought, but he shot low like it seems all our players now just do as a default.
The Sedins were both around a .75 ppg player in the playoffs.We can still win tomorrow and make a 2-1 series but this might be a little different than the Rangers series. You never know though.
I have not seen a momentum shift yet but it will happen, hopefully before it is too late. When this happens Carolina will look beatable and we will all feel like we wasted an opportunity. I think it will happen tomorrow.
Carolina is not only matching our speed they are burying us in puck movement, defense, and taking the body. Ruff needs to change up some strategy quickly.
Every playoffs I notice winning teams always have a a strong nucleus of larger thick boned solid players that wear teams down. Carolina and Florida both seem to have it. We have some but need to work on this in the offseason. Carolina is built like Rod Brindamour himself.
I see Bratt is everyone's whipping boy. He doesn't have to be but we do not have enough bone to let him do what he is capable of.
I am not a Bratt hater but like many I knew all along these guys become less effective when the game gets rough, unless the surrounding team is strong. The Sedin twins were a great example of great talents that lose productivity post season.
Go Devils, WIN GAME TWO for us!!
View attachment 703546
No doubtHardest trophy to win for this reason and many others.
A couple of sociopaths would go a long way towards leveling the playing field.Ruff needs to come up with a new scheme to get these guys going, their breakout is completely gone and can't generate anything through the NZ. I don't think dump and chase will work for them, they're getting outworked for every single puck.
The bottom line is they are getting their ass beat retrieving and battling for pucks in every zone all over the ice, the Canes simply want it more and are relentless on them whenever they do have the puck. That's kryptonite to someone like Bratt ATM who just peels off to the wall when pressured and gets his lunch money stolen.
They need to be a bit more patient and play the waiting game a bit and try to pounce on mistakes and counter attack. I think they're pressing way too hard trying to make something happen out there, then mismanage of the puck, cough it up and it's in our net. They look like total newbs out there.
And soft as a pillow.The Sedins were both around a .75 ppg player in the playoffs.
I don’t see this as a bright spot. I mean I’m glad they are playing well but they shouldn’t be our best players.we’re not getting quality chances, i’d go dump and chase like we did to turn around the rangers series.
i will say one of the bright spots has been our 4th line. mcleod has been one of our better forwards, which isn’t something i thought i’d ever say.
I don’t see this as a bright spot. I mean I’m glad they are playing well but they shouldn’t be our best players.
I don’t see this as a bright spot. I mean I’m glad they are playing well but they shouldn’t be our best players.
Mocking the point doesn’t make it invalid. Why is it a good thing that the fourth line players are thr only ones functioning?
you should ask somebody who said that. i certainly didn’t.Why is it a good thing that the fourth line players are thr only ones functioning?
Then why the Debbie Downer gif?you should ask somebody who said that. i certainly didn’t.
me: mcleod has been a bright spot.Then why the Debbie Downer gif?
I agree that McLeod’s game has taken a step in the playoffs. That’s a very nice development. But the big picture issue is valid. The fourth line should not be the best line. Guys like Hughes Hischier and Bratt have to figure it out. To be fair it’s a small sample size and some of it is bad luck. In this case I think some of it is systemic and the young top six players have to be given better coaching than battle harder but that is part of it.me: mcleod has been a bright spot.
guitar whatever: he shouldn’t be our best player
god forbid i try to find a silver lining- in this case, a guy whose career has been a perpetual disappointment is playing well and finding his niche.
enough has been said already about our top 6. mcleod’s development is a good thing.
yes lol it’s valid, but it’s not the point i was making. that valid point has been discussed ad nauseam. we’re not winning the series without contributions from our top 6, i think that’s pretty obvious.I agree that McLeod’s game has taken a step in the playoffs. That’s a very nice development. But the big picture issue is valid. The fourth line should not be the best line. Guys like Hughes Hischier and Bratt have to figure it out. To be fair it’s a small sample size and some of it is bad luck. In this case I think some of it is systemic and the young top six players have to be given better coaching than battle harder but that is part of it.
For what it's worth, Akira was only a -0.77 GSAx last night on moneypucks game log. Haven't looked at NST's yet.
So it's fair to say he was playing fine until that cowboy moment at the end of the period that resulted in goal 4.
Vitek was a -1.21 GSAx.
I didn't think any of the goals he allowed in game 1 were ones where I would realistically expect a save on. Well, the one on Vitek I did.I maintain that I don't think any of this has been on Akira and Vitek has looked quite shakey