TBF1972
Registered User
- May 19, 2018
- 8,315
- 6,800
i don't think it's nico causing your liver vibesI know that’s most likely a joke, but I really get lifer vibes from Nico.
i don't think it's nico causing your liver vibesI know that’s most likely a joke, but I really get lifer vibes from Nico.
This exactly. The Devils need to hold onto the puck for an extra half second for the lanes to open up. They have the skill to take advantage of teams selling out to block shots, but it's tough to make that adjustment in-game when you're jittery and chasing the game.I think the Rangers could keep this style of play up the entire series but the Devils should make adjustments so that it would be foolish for them to do so.
If the Rangers are going to sell out on shot blocking then you need to fake more shots, you need to be going East to West to making blocking more difficult, you need to setup your cycle to be prepared for shots off the board as the shooter shoots wide to avoid the block, etc…
The Devils should play different in game 2 than they did in game 1 and hopefully the changes are so effective that the Rangers need to then adjust their game plan.
If you force the Rangers to change their gameplan it will lead to them loosening up as their gameplan is very tight and slow right now. That will benefit the Devils.
You can both be great. But it's hard to argue how memorable this GDT will be.
agree. sending out the offense while on defence is a huge coaching failure.Even a great goalie probably gives up at least two tonight. NJ was discombobulated on the PK and why were three centers on the ice for Lundgren’s goal? None of those guys had a clue what to do there and that’s not hero fault. If you play five left tackles at the same time four guys are out of position and nobody is snapping the ball.
please stop I'm getting PTSD. devils, mets, jets fan here :')Nah those Jets were so hopeless, as most Jet teams are. It brought back last year's Mets because that regular season was the good ship lollipop for 150+ games, everything went right until the last two series of the year that meant anything - at Atlanta and the Padres in the playoffs. It's like you could care less the Mets won 100 games because they were SO bad when the chips were down. Just like the Devils being the winningest team in team history and all the other cutsie individual records are gonna be worth a pile of shit if they get bounced in four or five easy games here.
That’s the thing though . Rangers are trying to fir e us to get away from the type of game we play when we are successful . They know what we are good at , and made adjustments to try and eliminate or st the very least minimize our speed through the neutral zone and force us to play a style we don’t really want to - chip the puck behind their D and chase .This exactly. The Devils need to hold onto the puck for an extra half second for the lanes to open up. They have the skill to take advantage of teams selling out to block shots, but it's tough to make that adjustment in-game when you're jittery and chasing the game.
I don't think the matchup is a nightmare, but it just highlights how idiotic it was that people actually wanted this series over the Islanders and thought we would own the matchup because we beat them in a couple 1 goal regular season games.
Also, the Devils now have 1 garbage time goal on Shesterkin over the last 5 periods. I think we can put to rest the theory being floated that we had somehow "solved" him.
But you came in hot with the “I got blasted for saying this completely irrelevant thing” as if it was at all predictive. It’s just something that has happened in the past, and barely worth mentioning. We haven’t won anything in decades, obviously we’ve lost our share of game 1s.It is a historical perspective as a fan that we as fans have watched this organization in a game 1 hole constantly over the years. It is not an analytical link to the current roster. How many ways do I have to write that?
That's all well and good that they had that strategy, but this is all a result of the Devils goalies giving up early backbreaking goals. It's the same thing as the Boston strategy. When the Devils fall behind, the teams can slow the game down, clog up the neutral zone, sell out to block shots, and have a much more effective defensive system.That’s the thing though . Rangers are trying to fir e us to get away from the type of game we play when we are successful . They know what we are good at , and made adjustments to try and eliminate or st the very least minimize our speed through the neutral zone and force us to play a style we don’t really want to - chip the puck behind their D and chase .
The good news is that I have seen us make our own adjustments where we use touch passes to a the player supporting the puck carrier , where the player skated into the pass with speed and backs off the defenders . Or even taking a pass and go east -west instead of north as fast as possible . That takes away from our quick transition game but at least we can gain the offensive zone .
Get a lead and make the Rangers open up and chase the game, and you'll kill them in transition. It's that simple. Fall behind early, and they're going to sit in a shell, sell out to block shots/passes, and let Shesterkin backstop anything else that trickles through. Boston set the blueprint in that April 8th game.We beat ourselves. Simple as that. The Rangers showed up with a game plan, and we were shooting from the hip. It was painfully obvious which team has been here before.
Extra passes, weak clears, general carelessness with the puck.. it's just not going to fly against a veteran team with a veteran coach and the best goalie in the world. It's just not. The powerplays were totally inexcusable.
That said, it's far from over. They had the yips. It was pretty clear. Now bear down, play to your strengths, and take Game 2 by force.
Score the first goal and ****ing FLOOR IT. Enough with the east/west nonsense after barely gaining the zone. Enough with the pretty passes at the circles. Embrace the speed game - do not help them eliminate it. Skate down their frigging throats, put every puck on net and crash the hell out of it.
Devils in 6.
Hamilton looked like Gelinas out there yesterday
I have been told on good faith that lineup is not set yet for game two but there will be at least one change and possibly a second… speculate away on the 1 change. I’ll say Sharangovich for Bastian
If anything, I’d stick Bastian on the net front on the PP. Move Timo down to PP2 to be a featured shooter.I have been told on good faith that lineup is not set yet for game two but there will be at least one change and possibly a second… speculate away on the 1 change. I’ll say Sharangovich for Bastian
Yea Bastian wouldn’t be my first choice but just reacting to game 1 seems like they benched him pretty quickly. I think Sharangovich is meant for the playoffs been saying it all year. Plays well in big moments, good PKer and not afraid to shoot the puckIf anything, I’d stick Bastian on the net front on the PP. Move Timo down to PP2 to be a featured shooter.
I don’t expect much in the way of lineup changes to be honest. Wouldn’t mind getting Luke in there. If they really want to get Sharangovich in, sit Wood (they won’t).
We have used the same setup all year ( with minor changes ) It’s easy to predict . It’s too easy for the Rangers to figure out and know how to stop it .Two high powered offenses have gone 0-19 on the PP in the playoffs with Golfcart, oof.
When he manages to hit the net. Just a very vanilla player for me, and I don’t think we lack for forward PKers to be honest. Our problems seem more with defending lanes around the net.Yea Bastian wouldn’t be my first choice but just reacting to game 1 seems like they benched him pretty quickly. I think Sharangovich is meant for the playoffs been saying it all year. Plays well in big moments, good PKer and not afraid to shoot the puck