Last edited:
The OT goal was on Rask. I acknowledge turnovers and poor zone coverage but Rask had a chance to freeze the puck and either couldn't hold on to the puck or chose to move it. Then, he was beaten short side on a shot that, from the looks of it, he saw.
Any moron blaming Rask for this loss needs to quit watching hockey. If you haven't figured out the sport by now there is no hope for you.
The OT goal was on Rask. I acknowledge turnovers and poor zone coverage but Rask had a chance to freeze the puck and either couldn't hold on to the puck or chose to move it. Then, he was beaten short side on a shot that, from the looks of it, he saw.
The OT goal was on Rask. I acknowledge turnovers and poor zone coverage but Rask had a chance to freeze the puck and either couldn't hold on to the puck or chose to move it. Then, he was beaten short side on a shot that, from the looks of it, he saw.
The OT goal was on Rask. I acknowledge turnovers and poor zone coverage but Rask had a chance to freeze the puck and either couldn't hold on to the puck or chose to move it. Then, he was beaten short side on a shot that, from the looks of it, he saw.
$7 million job. Awful.
So was Rask a star? Or did he just play ok. Made some saves but when it matter he didn't come up big. 7 million a year coming up big at the right time is part of the contract. He is not the only reason but anything short of great goaltending will win nothing in the playoffs.