You're going to have to explain some things here Mort. You say you don't think top line points are everything but it's all you have talked about completely ignoring P/60, his most likely reduced 5 on 5 TOI he would have on the Jets 2nd line, his reduced PP TOI on PP2, his history of effect on line mates, his reduced importance on a line that include in my opinion 2 better players than himself and, not playing with Leon or McDavid (see players like Maroon or Chiasson point production away from those players).
Some how through all of that you expect him to be better than what you call his average point production of over 60 points but call that type of production "not great" as a 2C. If he can reach that "not great" production what does a 60+ point 2C player cost in a trade? Can you show me a similar trade? What does that type of 2C cost the Jets in a contract after next year? Is he really better than Huberdeau or Couturier like you say?
Thats a lot to unpack.
Yes that is a lot. I'm making no attempt at going into it in that depth. Points aren't
everything but they are the single most important thing.
Everything you have said about him seems to assume that he has always played on the top line in Edmonton. That just isn't so. He has spent a lot of time on the 2nd and 3rd lines. He has not always played with either Leon or McDavid. They were not even with the Oilers for much of his career. He played with one or the other for much of the last 2 years - and he was very productive. No surprise, he should be with those linemates.
No, I don't think I said I expected more than his avg production. A 60 pt 2C would be a nice improvement over what we have had and have now. 60 pts is good for a 2C. It is not great. The great 2C's score ppg or better.
No, I don't think I ever said he was better than Huberdeau or Couturier either. In fact I know for certain I never said that. He has scored 6 more pts than Huberdeau, in 68 more games. That doesn't look like better. He has scored 41 more pts than Couturier in 43 fewer games. That looks good but Couturier was used in a defensive role until the last 3 years. He has scored very well in a more offensive role and is outstanding defensively so I wouldn't say that RNH is better than him either.
A 60 pt 2C costs a lot. Kesler cost Bonino, Sbisa and a 1st. Johansen cost Seth Jones. Its tough to say what RNH might cost on his next contract without knowing what NHL finances are going to look like. But going by current standards, I would guess it would be at least 7 mil, maybe 7.5. And it could be more if he went to market. I think his ask will be inflated because he has been overpaid for several years and will want a raise. None of which has anything to do with him being a bad player. He is not garbage, he is not bad. He is a disappointing 1st OA and was given too high a 2nd contract, apparently just because that is what Oilers automatically gave their 1st rd picks. At least until Yak.
With a 1st OA pick you are expecting an above avg 1C. He never achieved that. He is an avg to slightly above avg 2C. Which is better than we have had.