Sasha Orlov
Lord of the Manor
- Jun 22, 2018
- 8,364
- 28,300
Yes but taking responsibility is part of it. Even if the team sucks you take that on too. It's better to come from a more positive place than a blame place which is what taking responsibility is a lot of time in this situation. You gotta get some momentum somewhere and sometimes it's from the captain busting his even ass when his team sucks and maybe you start to get more from the rest.Let’s be real, if any of you have ever played anything competitive, you know it’s tough to lead and be 100 percent all the time when you know you can’t trust your team. Anyone who’s actually been the best or one of the better players know that the responsibility of carrying a limp team is difficult mentally.
Both things can be right. And Larkin shouldn't be airing this publicly.It has been discussed ad nausem on the Wings board. Half of us believe he should step up and lead his team better, the other half believes he's right and Steve should've added at the deadline.
I fall into the former group.
It has been discussed ad nausem on the Wings board. Half of us believe he should step up and lead his team better, the other half believes he's right and Steve should've added at the deadline.
I fall into the former group.
Lmao Yzerman has sucked in Detroit but they didn’t play like they should have been buyers. Trade his ass and start over
Why can't both be true?It has been discussed ad nausem on the Wings board. Half of us believe he should step up and lead his team better, the other half believes he's right and Steve should've added at the deadline.
I fall into the former group.
Both things can be true at the same time.It has been discussed ad nausem on the Wings board. Half of us believe he should step up and lead his team better, the other half believes he's right and Steve should've added at the deadline.
I fall into the former group.
he always sounds like that. very monotone, borderline depressive personality. Probably dosnt spark or fire up the troopsLarkin really needs to stop sounding like someone is holding his puppy hostage. Being a leader for the team, that kind of attitude permeates the lineup. Time and time again most broadcasters note that the bench just slumps and lowers their heads whenever something doesn't go their way. They need to be their own agents of change and start playing like professionals and stop coming up with reasons as to why you aren't getting to where you wanted to go. All that time from when McLellan was hired, up until March, was the same team. So there should be no excuse why, when you are playing almost .700 hockey, that you can't at least go .500 in March and have secured your playoff spot.
It really is as simple as that. They could have finished a game or two under .500 for March and still be in the Playoffs...but that dumpster fire of an effort is all on them. Yzerman doesn't need to bail them out right now. They need to learn to play like pros.
As a Wings fan I'm on the fence...While Yzerman has had varying results via trades/free agency there is not much to pick from since not everyone wants to play in Detroit...On the other hand Larkin (while he needs to step it up) has been by far the best player on this team for several seasons and it continues to struggle with no hope in sight.It has been discussed ad nausem on the Wings board. Half of us believe he should step up and lead his team better, the other half believes he's right and Steve should've added at the deadline.
I fall into the former group.
Yes, after moving JT miller (instead of that organizational rash of Petterrson), Boeser leaving soon in FA and Hughes potentially walking (as alluded to by Rutherford this week , coupled with the fact it’s Canada, I’m sure Larkin would love to go to Vancouver.Vancouver would be all over that. But their biggest trade chip is a defenseman and the Wings don't really need to bolster the backend with more youth.