Who do they realistically replace him with if he's fired?
Frederic Chabot was fired by the Oilers and went to Minnesota, where he seems to have fixed Talbot and also got a few good years out of Dubnyk. Of course, I think he was also here for some of the DoD years.As a results based business, we would need tangible stats to look at to properly assess his effectiveness as a goalie coach.
Just to keep it a fair evaluation from a fan point of view
- results of previous oiler coaches to compare his stats to
- results of potential replacements
- what are the stats of the goalies before and after training with Schwartz
- who are the goalie coaches that are head and shoulders better in developing NHL goal tenders that are lining up to try take that position from Schwartz
He is paid to coach the goalies, what else is there to know.I don't think anyone here knows enough about what our goalie coach does or doesn't do to express an opinion on this fairly.
My point has been proven.He is paid to coach the goalies, what else is there to know.
Interesting. Would love to hear more from your perspective as a goalie coach.as someone who has coached multiple high level goaltenders including the collegiate and WHL I have no idea how he has kept his job. the goalies either dont respond or react to his teachings or they do and his methods and teachings are trash. either way he is an ineffective coach.
Literally could stop 2/3 of the top corner glove hand goals on koskinen if he would hold his glove 1-2 " closer to the shooters.
I've been proven wrong. One person here has the knowledge to critique, and I would love to hear more as well.as someone who has coached multiple high level goaltenders including the collegiate and WHL I have no idea how he has kept his job. the goalies either dont respond or react to his teachings or they do and his methods and teachings are trash. either way he is an ineffective coach.
Literally could stop 2/3 of the top corner glove hand goals on koskinen if he would hold his glove 1-2 " closer to the shooters.
as someone who has coached multiple high level goaltenders including the collegiate and WHL I have no idea how he has kept his job. the goalies either dont respond or react to his teachings or they do and his methods and teachings are trash. either way he is an ineffective coach.
Literally could stop 2/3 of the top corner glove hand goals on koskinen if he would hold his glove 1-2 " closer to the shooters.
They should hire you, IMO
I sub out the goalie coaching with the older kids now because i had the realization that because i dont have the professional experience i wasnt qualified to offer guidance at that level. but its not a coincidence that a goalie like dubnyk who struggled here terribly (and in mtl, nash phx as well) but then got to minnesota and became a rock. it wasnt some magic coaching, they allowed him to limit his movement and play more of a blocking style than an athletic style. Goalies over 6'3 - 6'4 and especially ones that are 6'7 should use minimal movements. They literally cover 75% of the net when in their full butterfly. Coming out 6-10" out of the crease makes that number mid 80s%. It can be harder for big goalies to track the puck because of their size (opposite of a Saros who can peak around the hips and legs of other players while still staying in a reactionary ready position) so they should be top of the crease to let the shots hit them. the more big goalies move the more holes they create, especially down low. If i was koskinens coach i would be working exclusively on rebound reactions and use of the glove hand.Interesting. Would love to hear more from your perspective as a goalie coach.