They absolutely should.
If someone from another city comes into your city DAILY uses your roads, wears everything down, and leaves doesn't pay a cent for the damage and maintenance they inflict on your infrastructure? How does that make any economic sense?
Everything else is managed this way. Every cities METRO has ZONES. When you come in from another zone you have to pay more. SAME reason. The people who USE the infrastructure should be required to pay for the maintenance and repair of that infrastructure.
Every bridge in Canada should be tolled. There is no reasonable explanation as to why they aren't.
Who should pay for a bridge?
THE PEOPLE WHO USE THE f***ING BRIDGE.
And jacking your price up is called free-market capitalism. Of course you should do that when your costs go up.
Everything about this is nonsense but just to point out a couple:
"
Every bridge in Canada should be tolled. There is no reasonable explanation as to why they aren't.
Who should pay for a bridge?
THE PEOPLE WHO USE THE f***ING BRIDGE."
The bridges were already paid for with tax dollars and now mostly maintained with tax dollars (specifically gas taxes - you know - paid for by car drivers).
"And jacking your price up is called free-market capitalism. Of course you should do that when your costs go up."
In no reality is a government increasing taxes, fees, levies or tariffs anything even close to free market. It's quite the opposite. If roads and bridges, etc., were all controlled by the free market and private enterprise, we'd have the best moving and maintained roads in the world. You know, like the 407. Then you can have your tolls. I gladly pay for for the 407 and in fact, I hope they increase the tolls to keep it free flowing. If you really think that's what would happen on the DVP, Gardiner, Allen, etc., while still managed by city bureaucrats, man, you have some soul searching to do.