I don't think it's really much of an issue. I mean i basically all but forgot about him. Kind of hard to believe Pat was depending on him in any way and yes easily addressed in other ways.Also found it odd Galiymov wasn't discussed. Doesn't sound promising. But thats ok. I think its a role we can address in FA and Sennecke will fill in the future as well (top 9)
I remember someone mentioning that on here, but I don’t recall any of them saying that on their podcast. Maybe it was on their spinoff podcast with Murley and Armstrong? I don’t listen to that one so I can’t say for sure.Chiclets are going to look really stupid if Moore does indeed end up signing with us. If I remember correctly, they made some dramatic declaration that Moore would rather play in Alaska than for the Ducks.
I don’t recall that either and I’ve never missed an episodeI remember someone mentioning that on here, but I don’t recall any of them saying that on their podcast. Maybe it was on their spinoff podcast with Murley and Armstrong? I don’t listen to that one so I can’t say for sure.
They are pretty f***ing stupid when it comes to Anaheim. I wouldn't surprised if Whitney had a grudge against the Ducks.Chiclets are going to look really stupid if Moore does indeed end up signing with us. If I remember correctly, they made some dramatic declaration that Moore would rather play in Alaska than for the Ducks.
Vatrano contract discussion - will we see more?
- Mitigates tax advantage of no state tax franchises
- Sounded washy washy about it
- Players often resistant to different structures
- Tired of listening to agents say we need to pay more due to taxes
More like it’s something agents use as leverage. I’m sure they don’t go to FL teams and say “hey take 10% offf the offer since you don’t have taxes.”So for anyone saying taxes arent an issue, heres your confirmation that taxes ARE an issue. To what degree? who knows. But the fact that agents ask for more simply because of the taxes shows they are at least on the table of possible issues when trying to sign a player.
As long as they dont get rid of the Vatrano-like contacts in the next CBA, sounds like they might have a structure for at least helping out with that issue though.
I think he liked the Ducks while Getz was here, but now that Getz is gone he has no connection to usThey are pretty f***ing stupid when it comes to Anaheim. I wouldn't surprised if Whitney had a grudge against the Ducks.
Colangelo taking "an NHL step" is a good way to phrase it I think.
Thank goodness that Cronin stopped putting Colangelo in a grinder role on the 4th line. Colangelo sounded depressed when he relayed in an interview during his first call-up that, I'm paraphrasing, "The only way to stay up with the NHL club is to accept making a priority of playing defense and hitting." I felt for him b/c he was the Gulls leading scorer and goal scorer when he was called up, but to only be told to grind with the 4th line to stay in the NHL club.
Don’t know if I can give Cronin credit for having an epiphany.Thank goodness that Cronin stopped putting Colangelo in a grinder role on the 4th line. Colangelo sounded depressed when he relayed in an interview during his first call-up that, I'm paraphrasing, "The only way to stay up with the NHL club is to accept making a priority of playing defense and hitting." I felt for him b/c he was the Gulls leading scorer and goal scorer when he was called up, but to only be told to grind with the 4th line to stay in the NHL club.
I think you may be giving Cronin too much credit. I think he lucked into Colangelo breakout and LaCombe unveiling due to Fabbri injury and Fowler trade.Thank goodness that Cronin stopped putting Colangelo in a grinder role on the 4th line. Colangelo sounded depressed when he relayed in an interview during his first call-up that, I'm paraphrasing, "The only way to stay up with the NHL club is to accept making a priority of playing defense and hitting." I felt for him b/c he was the Gulls leading scorer and goal scorer when he was called up, but to only be told to grind with the 4th line to stay in the NHL club.
I didn’t watch him much in College, but from my limited viewings his skating has improved immensely to where it’s borderline a strength in his game now. Is that accurate?
I think you may be giving Cronin too much credit. I think he lucked into Colangelo breakout and LaCombe unveiling due to Fabbri injury and Fowler trade.
That’s kinda how these things work, you get a cup of coffee in a role not suited for you. (Remember he also played “top” line with Vats and Strome after Terry’s kid issues….our legit worse stretch of hockey this season…... )then an injury to a person who was blocking him into a role he can thrive. And he’s stepped up to the plate and knocked it out of the park so far.Don’t know if I can give Cronin credit for having an epiphany.
I think you may be giving Cronin too much credit. I think he lucked into Colangelo breakout and LaCombe unveiling due to Fabbri injury and Fowler trade.
I obviously know that you’re not “pro Cronin.” Which is why your first sentence surprised me. I think if Fabbri hadn’t been injured, Colangelo would still be on the 4th line. I also think that if Fowler hadn’t been dealt, we wouldn’t be seeing the LaCombe offensive explosion.You need to read my post again. It was me criticizing Cronin for misjudging Colangelo's talent and seeing him only as a 4th line grinder when he first got him despite being the Gulls leading scorer and goal scorer at the time of his call-up, i.e., not putting Colangelo into a position to succeed.
Also, I don't understand your stance that I'm pro Cronin. It feels like you are painting me completely different from my reporting. Especially when you keep saying LaCombe came out of nowhere this year, when I pointed to last year's vast improvement to close out the season as well as me saying the skyrocketing LaCombe is playing the same way he was in college. Verbeek even stated LaCombe's last year in college is playing that way now in the NHL, insinuating that all LaCombe needed was some time to adjust to the speed and game play.
You gotta take a moment or 10 to scrub your obvious bias of me to often mistake my stance.
Colangelo was the reason i thought Fabbri should be moved.... but honestly maybe no one wanted fabbri.I obviously know that you’re not “pro Cronin.” Which is why your first sentence surprised me. I think if Fabbri hadn’t been injured, Colangelo would still be on the 4th line. I also think that if Fowler hadn’t been dealt, we wouldn’t be seeing the LaCombe offensive explosion.
I would argue that it doesn’t need to be this way.That’s kinda how these things work, you get a cup of coffee in a role not suited for you. (Remember he also played “top” line with Vats and Strome after Terry’s kid issues….our legit worse stretch of hockey this season…... )then an injury to a person who was blocking him into a role he can thrive. And he’s stepped up to the plate and knocked it out of the park so far.
Does the 4th line grinder / top line overmatched / back to AHL as an all star, did all these things combined give him enough confidence / intel on what he needs to do with his game to succeed at the NHL / show NHL coaching staff he will do anything to help the “team” over self.
Yeah I think that’s the point of developing.
You are 100 % right, it doesn’t need to be this way. But we have a GM who says he doesn’t want to rush prospects until they are physically ready, wants to build a culture and team that “competes”.I would argue that it doesn’t need to be this way.