Confirmed with Link: Ducks fire Greg Cronin

Conversely he had decades of coaching experience and (as far as we know) no scandals at the time he was hired.

Maybe he's a decent guy and a decent coach that couldn't handle the NHL and it brought out the worst of him. It's not like it's an easy job.
Yes, but I wouldn't call this a scandal as much as just a coach who's shelf life had expired. Which would tend to jive with your last paragraph.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zegrassyknoll
My take on it is that Greg Cronin talked a great game in the interview process. He's terrible in ad hoc analysis interviews, but we've also seen him be very coherent and comfortable in other settings where he's more prepared. He also was well respected within other hockey circles (the Avalanche organization seemed to love him). And whatever skeletons there might have been in his closet, it seems like they didn't quite rise to the level where hockey men couldn't dismiss them as simply a gruff coach being gruff.

But even if there were warning signs, I think Cronin sold Verbeek by pitching the exact type of environment Verbeek wanted for a young team: strong work ethic, emphasis on toughness and individual responsibility, defensive-minded, no BS. I think Verbeek was hoping that he had found the next Rod Brind'Amour and that when the system was working, the Ducks would play like Carolina.

Spoiler alert: Verbeek had not, in fact, found the next Rod Brind'Amour. Cronin doesn't have the credibility that Rod has, so when his schtick got old (as that schtick invariably does), there was no basis of belief that pushing through would lead to success. Cronin was just an old dude yelling at them in a thick Boston accent.

I think Verbeek was probably alarmed by some of the exit interviews last season, but hoped that a conversation with Cronin would help him learn to adapt. And maybe Cronin did a little bit, but obviously not enough, and, clearly, the Ducks got no closer to playing like Carolina.
 
cronin scammed his way into a NHL HC gig. i'll give him credit for that

I think scammed makes it seem nefarious. Cronin is a coach in hockey who had aspirations on coaching in the NHL as a head coach. It's a goal shared by most if not all his colleagues. When in the interview, Cronin made his pitch, and it worked. Unfortunately, he couldn't deliver and that sucks. But scammed makes it seem like he stole the position to intentionally be bad or with the knowledge it would be bad. I'm sure he thought it was going to be a success. Bummer it didn't work for all parties.
 
I think scammed makes it seem nefarious. Cronin is a coach in hockey who had aspirations on coaching in the NHL as a head coach. It's a goal shared by most if not all his colleagues. When in the interview, Cronin made his pitch, and it worked. Unfortunately, he couldn't deliver and that sucks. But scammed makes it seem like he stole the position to intentionally be bad or with the knowledge it would be bad. I'm sure he thought it was going to be a success. Bummer it didn't work for all parties.
wish we could see the interview(s) cronin had with verbeek and the FO. i'm sure he said exactly what they wanted to hear, but it was obvious from the beginning that he was completely out of place in his position. some coaches just aren't meant to be the top guy, and cronin is one of them. i'm sure he tried his best to deliver on whatever he said to sell the team in his interviews, but he clearly wasn't capable of that

verbeek and co had every reason to bring him back with the 20 pt improvement from last season and guys like lacombe and mctavish having strong seasons, but they opted to fire him instead. what does that tell you?
 
Come on, he's been in hockey for 40 years. He didn't take well to being an NHL coach, but he earned the right to try.
Agreed. It's not like he was a bum pulled out of nowhere, he had some pretty good credentials. Plus it would have been pretty cool to see a guy who's grinded for his whole life to get a crack at the NHL actually succeed, just a shame it didn't work out that way.

Still hope he has a few more good years in the AHL before calling it a day.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Static
I think scammed makes it seem nefarious. Cronin is a coach in hockey who had aspirations on coaching in the NHL as a head coach. It's a goal shared by most if not all his colleagues. When in the interview, Cronin made his pitch, and it worked. Unfortunately, he couldn't deliver and that sucks. But scammed makes it seem like he stole the position to intentionally be bad or with the knowledge it would be bad. I'm sure he thought it was going to be a success. Bummer it didn't work for all parties.
Exactly, the guy genuinely thought he'd be a good coach and had a good philosophy to implement, so it isn't fair to characterize it like that. Cronin is probably just a really good salesman in interviews, hell i think a lot of us were optimistic that he had changed somewhat in his interview before this season. I'm sure he told Pat everything he wanted to hear and tried hit all the high notes. In Pat's defense, you can see why he would've hired him given what he sold him in the interview and his previous track record of being the type of coach Pat was looking for. But it was up to him to sniff that out for sure, and I think the more blameworthy act of Verbeek's was not firing him last year as he apparently considered. Coaches like Cronin, and bosses in general, rarely drastically change and especially so when they are in their 60s - It was like expecting Carlyle to change in his 2nd stint.
 
My take on it is that Greg Cronin talked a great game in the interview process. He's terrible in ad hoc analysis interviews, but we've also seen him be very coherent and comfortable in other settings where he's more prepared. He also was well respected within other hockey circles (the Avalanche organization seemed to love him). And whatever skeletons there might have been in his closet, it seems like they didn't quite rise to the level where hockey men couldn't dismiss them as simply a gruff coach being gruff.

But even if there were warning signs, I think Cronin sold Verbeek by pitching the exact type of environment Verbeek wanted for a young team: strong work ethic, emphasis on toughness and individual responsibility, defensive-minded, no BS. I think Verbeek was hoping that he had found the next Rod Brind'Amour and that when the system was working, the Ducks would play like Carolina.

Spoiler alert: Verbeek had not, in fact, found the next Rod Brind'Amour. Cronin doesn't have the credibility that Rod has, so when his schtick got old (as that schtick invariably does), there was no basis of belief that pushing through would lead to success. Cronin was just an old dude yelling at them in a thick Boston accent.

I think Verbeek was probably alarmed by some of the exit interviews last season, but hoped that a conversation with Cronin would help him learn to adapt. And maybe Cronin did a little bit, but obviously not enough, and, clearly, the Ducks got no closer to playing like Carolina.
Never compared cro w rod the bod before but this makes complete sense to me

imagine being a punk ass 20 year old nhl player and brindamour a legit two way player in the nhl for a long time jn his own right jumps on the bike next to you in the gym and outperforms your VO2 max. Then says… kid i am twice your age you need to be/do better.
 
The fact that Pat said it was a shock to Cronin speaks a lot more about Pat than Greg. In the course of two years of them both speaking back and forth, Greg didn't realize what his biggest failure was until he was fired?
When I read about this it made me think about the Beckett Sennecke interview where said that he had no clue or feeling that the ducks had any interest in him and Pat just holds every card super close to the chest.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hockey Duckie
When I read about this it made me think about the Beckett Sennecke interview where said that he had no clue or feeling that the ducks had any interest in him and Pat just holds every card super close to the chest.
Well, we'll never know what conversations they had, but most employee/employer conversations during the year revolve around job expectations and year end reviews go over all of that. Not quite the same conversation you would have in a one off interview with a prospective hire.

The guy who didn't get hired for the job might be confused and surprised why he wasn't hired (or hired). The guy who had it for two years and got fired for performance related issues shouldn't have been surprised.
 
wish we could see the interview(s) cronin had with verbeek and the FO. i'm sure he said exactly what they wanted to hear, but it was obvious from the beginning that he was completely out of place in his position. some coaches just aren't meant to be the top guy, and cronin is one of them. i'm sure he tried his best to deliver on whatever he said to sell the team in his interviews, but he clearly wasn't capable of that

verbeek and co had every reason to bring him back with the 20 pt improvement from last season and guys like lacombe and mctavish having strong seasons, but they opted to fire him instead. what does that tell you?
Don’t really need to listen to the whole thing, but the first 9 minutes or so he speaks about the interview process, and says all the right things hahaha.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad