Confirmed with Link: Ducks fire Greg Cronin

I wonder if this gets to the core of what PV finally realized? Much like the ice time issues so prominently discussed around here?
Seems like it, especially when you combine it with Cronin's comments about how different guys need different approaches (more explaining versus yelling) and how it was a late realization for him. So we need a coach who understands that different players have different needs and is capable of taking different approaches.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hey234
I don’t think just because he said it wasn’t related to something that it necessarily means he really means that, he clearly wants his reasons for firing him to be private. All we can really do is guess
I agree, we're just guessing. And I 1,000% support that PV keep it private.

My dislike for Cronin never went beyond his ability to coach an NHL team. I wish him nothing but the best and am happy for him that he got to make a little retirement money before his career ended. Best wishes to him wherever he goes and whatever he does.
 
You said this last year, Pat, and your "aggressiveness" got us Dumo and Harkins.
He didn’t really say anything of the sort. He said (paraphrasing a little) …. I want to add a top 6 RHW and top 4 RHD, but 31 other teams can also say the same thing.

I just hope that people realize active and agressive probably means one of if not multiple of Zegras / Zelly / Minty may be moved. Hell even LaCombe if an Eichel type becomes available or something.

Now granted I don’t see him trading these guys for picks or futures, but probably pcs for a 24-28 year old top 6 forwards / top 2 defensemen.
 
if this coaching change was made because winning is the priority, then there's no way in hell you could justify keeping clune on the staff after how awful the PP was this season
I remember Cronin and clune not seeming on the same page….

I do wonder how much control the assistants even had.

Maybe PV is going to wait till head coaxh is hired before he moves assistants…. As head coach may want to keep them or bring in guys he’s comfortable with
 
He didn’t really say anything of the sort. He said (paraphrasing a little) …. I want to add a top 6 RHW and top 4 RHD, but 31 other teams can also say the same thing.

I just hope that people realize active and agressive probably means one of if not multiple of Zegras / Zelly / Minty may be moved. Hell even LaCombe if an Eichel type becomes available or something.

Now granted I don’t see him trading these guys for picks or futures, but probably pcs for a 24-28 year old top 6 forwards / top 2 defensemen.
Umm sure it’s possible, but it’s far more likely the aggression will come in UFA just like he did last year.
 
Umm sure it’s possible, but it’s far more likely the aggression will come in UFA just like he did last year.
Just seems weird last offseason he said he wants to try and add, and this year he says “Active” and aggressive. The (and I could be grasping at straws here) active part sounds trade-ish to me.
 
I wonder if this gets to the core of what PV finally realized? Much like the ice time issues so prominently discussed around here?

I was just about to post this exact quote as it stood out to me as well. This is one of his most telling statements IMO. It gives the perception that there was a divide between how the vets and young players wanted to be coached. This does not mean the players were upset with each other. More that they wanted the coach to do different things, and it made it difficult to have cohesion in the system.
 
I was just about to post this exact quote as it stood out to me as well. This is one of his most telling statements IMO. It gives the perception that there was a divide between how the vets and young players wanted to be coached. This does not mean the players were upset with each other. More that they wanted the coach to do different things, and it made it difficult to have cohesion in the system.
IMO it would appear to be a realization they just weren’t on the same page on the path fowrward. Though I would find it a mystery why Pat wouldn’t have already know that.
 
I was just about to post this exact quote as it stood out to me as well. This is one of his most telling statements IMO. It gives the perception that there was a divide between how the vets and young players wanted to be coached. This does not mean the players were upset with each other. More that they wanted the coach to do different things, and it made it difficult to have cohesion in the system.
I gotta assume it’s tough on a coaching staff / locker room (especially a first time head coach) when you have to bench the vets and allow the future to take over. I’d also like some direction from my GM on what is more important to him, and maybe that direction was given and not used.

Like, the terry strome vatrano line did carry us for a healthy portion of this season.

It’s probably easier for a new coach to come in and say, Strome you’re 4th line with blah blah blah. And as a “leader” plus accountability …. Analytics, should be easier on the locker room.

But all guessing.
 
Yes, but he seemed to imply he only came to the realization after the team was out of the hunt this year.
I read the back and forth a while ago, but from what I understood, I thought he meant. There were some things early in the season, and then once we were out of the hunt, some more things happened, and it was really month by month cases and it just became time to pull the trigger.

I really gotta assume at the end of the day the advanced stats analytics had to be a major reason as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ohcomeonref
Just seems weird last offseason he said he wants to try and add, and this year he says “Active” and aggressive. The (and I could be grasping at straws here) active part sounds trade-ish to me.
Reports are that he offered higher contracts then were accepted to all the top UFAs. I would call that active and aggressive.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad