GDT: Ducks at Canes - Eric Staal Jersey Retirement Night.

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it.
Canes played against a team on a b2b who nevertheless had some motivation since they were embarrassed 6-0 the day before. But.....under those circumstances, the Canes should never lose this game to a bottom feeder at home. They played lackadaisical and once again didn't get a fully competent goaltender performance. Even with the overall team awful effort/high level Dostal game, Canes should have won at minimum 2-1 or even 1-0. Goaltenders are paid to make saves and sometimes you need them to win a game for you.

Essentially Dostal bested Pyotr last night and once again Pytor made a few tough saves but let in softies that cost the Canes the game (last 2 were brutally bad....first, too deep in the net, second, just bad).

Celebrating Pytor because he made a few good/great saves but lost the game due to giving up goals he shouldn't is similar to football fans who will say, my QB had 3 nice TD passes last night but ignore the fact that his 2 interceptions or a key fumble (ie Mayfield last night) cost their team the game.

Statistically (and these are facts/are not subjective....that's how I am viewing Pytor, who I rate very high as a person btw):

Pytor is ranked nicely for "high danger" saves (.835 save/80 percentile & 187 saves/87 percentile) but is dismal in mid-range and long-range shots (below 50 percentile) which validates the observations many of us have during in-game and post-game thoughts.

Details from NHL edge below (summary and then a picture of high, mid, long-range stats):
His GAA is 65 percentile, overall save % is Below 50, only 50% of his games does he deliver better than .900 save %.....that's not quality goaltending and would kill us in key games in the playoffs.
1736781052088.png




Ducks GM sees that goal go in and raises his price on Gibson.
albeit from a rock-bottom price due to the 6-0 loss the day before
 

Attachments

  • 1736779288710.png
    1736779288710.png
    366 KB · Views: 1
Last edited:
Honestly, I don't know if I can really blame him for this loss. For all intents and purposes the Canes played a decent game, the Ducks just played really sound defensive hockey, clogged up all passing and shooting lanes, and let us just pump shots from beyond the faceoff circles, and then just played over the line physically all game daring the refs to call something in a game where they just refused to call anything. Which, I mean they executed the book that was written on us years ago, and it isn't totally surprising they did given Gudas and Trouba are now manning their blueline.

And even then, we were just completely snakebit offensively, with multiple wide open net whiffs throughout the game and a puck that just refused to stay on anyone's stick.
This is where i'm at - i told the oldest early on that this game got a lot tougher when the refs decided to 'let them play' because that favors the ducks. yes, we still should beat that team. it is laughable that the canes got one legit powerplay the way that game was played. i don't really count the first - it was about 45 seconds and even though svech was legit tripped, i truly believe it wouldn't have been called if they weren't trying to make up for the 'drury must be a jedi' no-touch trip call it canceled out.

gauthier's first goal was basically the same as jarvis' goal - with placement that perfect, no goalie is stopping those unless they do it accidentally.

i'm generally more of a sunshine-squad type around here, but i will say this game is the perfect example of what makes me worry about playoffs. playoff officiating is always a bit looser, but if we get a couple games as loose as they were last night i don't know if the canes keep the streak alive.

(caveat - i won't be mad at a first round exit if we make it. we're overdue. it happened to the bruins 'greatest team ever' a couple years ago, tampa vs cbj, detroit in '06. it happens to everyone. it has been 24 years since we made the playoffs and immediately exited. as a state fan, i'm conditioned that any success should lead to one action - girding yourself for the regression to mean.)
 
This is where i'm at - i told the oldest early on that this game got a lot tougher when the refs decided to 'let them play' because that favors the ducks. yes, we still should beat that team. it is laughable that the canes got one legit powerplay the way that game was played. i don't really count the first - it was about 45 seconds and even though svech was legit tripped, i truly believe it wouldn't have been called if they weren't trying to make up for the 'drury must be a jedi' no-touch trip call it canceled out.

gauthier's first goal was basically the same as jarvis' goal - with placement that perfect, no goalie is stopping those unless they do it accidentally.

i'm generally more of a sunshine-squad type around here, but i will say this game is the perfect example of what makes me worry about playoffs. playoff officiating is always a bit looser, but if we get a couple games as loose as they were last night i don't know if the canes keep the streak alive.

(caveat - i won't be mad at a first round exit if we make it. we're overdue. it happened to the bruins 'greatest team ever' a couple years ago, tampa vs cbj, detroit in '06. it happens to everyone. it has been 24 years since we made the playoffs and immediately exited. as a state fan, i'm conditioned that any success should lead to one action - girding yourself for the regression to mean.)
this is why Devils could have an edge on us (Markstrom):
1736780819179.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: MinJaBen
This is Gibson's stats...my view, no thanks:
View attachment 960290

Well, given what you showed about Pyotr and what we see here for Gibson, I see why the Canes might want him. I am too lazy to do the math, but do we see more or less goals go in if Gibson is better at low and medium danger (range) shots but worse at high danger shots compared to Pyotr? I bet the Canes analytics staff has that number.
 
Canes played against a team on a b2b who nevertheless had some motivation since they were embarrassed 6-0 the day before. But.....under those circumstances, the Canes should never lose this game to a bottom feeder at home. They played lackadaisical and once again didn't get a fully competent goaltender performance. Even with the overall team awful effort/high level Dostal game, Canes should have won at minimum 2-1 or even 1-0. Goaltenders are paid to make saves and sometimes you need them to win a game for you.

Essentially Dostal bested Pyotr last night and once again Pytor made a few tough saves but let in softies that cost the Canes the game (last 2 were brutally bad....first, too deep in the net, second, just bad).

Celebrating Pytor because he made a few good/great saves but lost the game due to giving up goals he shouldn't is similar to football fans who will say, my QB had 3 nice TD passes last night but ignore the fact that his 2 interceptions or a key fumble (ie Mayfield last night) cost their team the game.

Statistically (and these are facts/are not subjective....that's how I am viewing Pytor, who I rate very high as a person btw):

Pytor is ranked nicely for "high danger" saves (.835 save/80 percentile & 187 saves/87 percentile) but is dismal in mid-range and long-range shots (below 50 percentile) which validates the observations many of us have during in-game and post-game thoughts.

Details from NHL edge below (summary and then a picture of high, mid, long-range stats):
His GAA is 65 percentile, overall save % is Below 50, only 50% of his games does he deliver better than .900 save %.....that's not quality goaltending and would kill us in key games in the playoffs.

View attachment 960285


albeit from a rock-bottom price due to the 6-0 loss the day before

interesting. I've never used NHL edge for stat digging. Will have to look into that. I think we all know in our hearts Pyotr isn't the guy. He's fine for now until Freddie comes back, but hopefully the Org eventually finds a better tandem to mind the goal.
 
This is Gibson's stats...my view, no thanks:
View attachment 960290
Thanks. When I look at those numbers for Gibson, it makes me think it's worth rolling the dice on Freddie coming back for this postseason and then finding a solution in the off-season to pair with Kochetkov in the future.

When Freddie has played in the regular season the past 2 years, his numbers have been very good.

I do think Rod needs to accept that Kochetkov will also play in the postseason to give Freddie rest. No more of this "tandem ends in the regular season" BS. They play a tandem during the regular season; play the tandem in the playoffs. Especially if Freddie could get hurt at any moment and likely doesn't have his conditioning (shouldn't be as bad as last postseason, but still a concern.)
 
Thanks. When I look at those numbers for Gibson, it makes me think it's worth rolling the dice on Freddie coming back for this postseason and then finding a solution in the off-season to pair with Kochetkov in the future.

When Freddie has played in the regular season the past 2 years, his numbers have been very good.

I do think Rod needs to accept that Kochetkov will also play in the postseason to give Freddie rest. No more of this "tandem ends in the regular season" BS. They play a tandem during the regular season; play the tandem in the playoffs. Especially if Freddie could get hurt at any moment and likely doesn't have his conditioning (shouldn't be as bad as last postseason, but still a concern.)
Freddie's 4 game sample this year and last year showcase a far superior goalie to Pytor (cough, game 6 excluded):
1736781559833.png


From last year:
1736781577408.png
 
Freddie IS a better goalie. The problem is that Freddie isn’t reliable health-wise to be useful to us. Case in point: Last night, PK obviously got hurt after a save. It was the scramble in the net during the 3rd period. It kept the puck out, but you could tell PK was laboring after that. If that was Freddie, we’d be getting a message on Wednesday about how “He’s dealing with something” and then a week later, we’d get the “Out for a while” quote from RBA,
 
Kooch is young and he’s playing like a young goalie typically plays. He gave up a questionable goal on a 2-on-1 to start the 3rd (though it was a hell of a shot over the shoulder), and then stop two more 2-on-1s in the following five minutes. And while it’s fair to say “Well, he should have stopped the one he allowed,” the bigger issue is probably “Why did the team give up three odd man rushes in a 1-0 game in a span of 6-7 minutes?”
If I may quote Steve Dangle "If you give up three breakaways in about a 9 minute stretch, you're probably doing something wrong"
 
gauthier's first goal was basically the same as jarvis' goal - with placement that perfect, no goalie is stopping those unless they do it accidentally.
My only thought in saying PK should have had this one is something that Tripp brought up that if he was thinking pass more than he should have been he was crouched a bit more to push. If he's standing 1/2 inch higher (which he might be if it's not a 2 on1) then it hits him more directly and stays out.

But yes it's pretty much a perfect shot so hard to fault him too much.
 
  • Like
Reactions: geehaad and zman77
this is why Devils could have an edge on us (Markstrom):
View attachment 960291
this is why the playoffs are such a crapshoot. given the canes and devils have basically the exact same results to date (they're 1 point ahead, we've 1 game in hand) my takeaway from the goalie numbers is that the team in front of PK is better than the team in front of markstrom: TG=P where P is points, T is team play, and G is goalie play. If P is constant, increased G means decreased T. (unless strength of schedule is crazy different. i didn't look it up. this is the 'ideal hockey law' so it ignores some real world things just like my dear beloved PV=nRT.)

So, i'm comfortable saying the canes' skaters are superior. I have no qualms saying markstrom is superior. in the playoffs it is more likely one guy can improve or drop off than 20 guys 5 at a time. (there's a your momma joke in there, but pressing on...)

if markstrom falls back a bit, it only takes four games (like all-everything vasi against cbj). if we have a guy get on a heater, who knows? cam had meh regular season numbers in '06. bob was a legit laughingstock before going super-saiyan and taking the 8 seed to the finals, then staying that way for another year.

or maybe we get yet another series where the goaltending is roughly equal and our special teams shit the bed. idk, anyone who gambles on playoff hockey needs to call the hotline.
 
Last edited:
Freddie IS a better goalie. The problem is that Freddie isn’t reliable health-wise to be useful to us. Case in point: Last night, PK obviously got hurt after a save. It was the scramble in the net during the 3rd period. It kept the puck out, but you could tell PK was laboring after that. If that was Freddie, we’d be getting a message on Wednesday about how “He’s dealing with something” and then a week later, we’d get the “Out for a while” quote from RBA,
But he's a better goalie than anyone you could pick up at the deadline.

I agree that moving on from Andersen after this season is the right move. So for me, the Gibson debate comes down to these questions:

Do we think that Gibson is better than any UFA option this coming off-season? Maybe. I think Vejmelka has looked good and will probably be everyone's top target assuming Logan Thompson is re-signed. In fact, Vejmelka is likely to be re-signed and off the board as well. After those two, it's a lot of projection of backups or reclamation projects.

Will Gibson still be available in the off-season, or is Carolina making the move now to guarantee they get him? Maybe they make the move now to lock in goalie beyond this year. In which case you might actually be downgrading from the lottery ticket of a theoretically healthy Andersen to Gibson in hopes Gibson regains his form on a more competitive team.

Gibson is less a move about this season to me; it's a move to solve goalie in 2026 and 2027.
 
  • Like
Reactions: geehaad and zman77
If they don’t extend him lankinen has shown flashes of brilliance this year. I don’t think Gibson is worth the assets it would take to get him. Not saying he sucks but I don’t see him as markedly better than kochetkov
 
  • Like
Reactions: geehaad and zman77

Ad

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad