TheBigLetowski
Registered User
- Jul 31, 2016
- 293
- 665
We are a first round out and we all know it. Be it jersey or the caps.
albeit from a rock-bottom price due to the 6-0 loss the day beforeDucks GM sees that goal go in and raises his price on Gibson.
This is where i'm at - i told the oldest early on that this game got a lot tougher when the refs decided to 'let them play' because that favors the ducks. yes, we still should beat that team. it is laughable that the canes got one legit powerplay the way that game was played. i don't really count the first - it was about 45 seconds and even though svech was legit tripped, i truly believe it wouldn't have been called if they weren't trying to make up for the 'drury must be a jedi' no-touch trip call it canceled out.Honestly, I don't know if I can really blame him for this loss. For all intents and purposes the Canes played a decent game, the Ducks just played really sound defensive hockey, clogged up all passing and shooting lanes, and let us just pump shots from beyond the faceoff circles, and then just played over the line physically all game daring the refs to call something in a game where they just refused to call anything. Which, I mean they executed the book that was written on us years ago, and it isn't totally surprising they did given Gudas and Trouba are now manning their blueline.
And even then, we were just completely snakebit offensively, with multiple wide open net whiffs throughout the game and a puck that just refused to stay on anyone's stick.
this is why Devils could have an edge on us (Markstrom):This is where i'm at - i told the oldest early on that this game got a lot tougher when the refs decided to 'let them play' because that favors the ducks. yes, we still should beat that team. it is laughable that the canes got one legit powerplay the way that game was played. i don't really count the first - it was about 45 seconds and even though svech was legit tripped, i truly believe it wouldn't have been called if they weren't trying to make up for the 'drury must be a jedi' no-touch trip call it canceled out.
gauthier's first goal was basically the same as jarvis' goal - with placement that perfect, no goalie is stopping those unless they do it accidentally.
i'm generally more of a sunshine-squad type around here, but i will say this game is the perfect example of what makes me worry about playoffs. playoff officiating is always a bit looser, but if we get a couple games as loose as they were last night i don't know if the canes keep the streak alive.
(caveat - i won't be mad at a first round exit if we make it. we're overdue. it happened to the bruins 'greatest team ever' a couple years ago, tampa vs cbj, detroit in '06. it happens to everyone. it has been 24 years since we made the playoffs and immediately exited. as a state fan, i'm conditioned that any success should lead to one action - girding yourself for the regression to mean.)
This is Gibson's stats...my view, no thanks:
View attachment 960290
Canes played against a team on a b2b who nevertheless had some motivation since they were embarrassed 6-0 the day before. But.....under those circumstances, the Canes should never lose this game to a bottom feeder at home. They played lackadaisical and once again didn't get a fully competent goaltender performance. Even with the overall team awful effort/high level Dostal game, Canes should have won at minimum 2-1 or even 1-0. Goaltenders are paid to make saves and sometimes you need them to win a game for you.
Essentially Dostal bested Pyotr last night and once again Pytor made a few tough saves but let in softies that cost the Canes the game (last 2 were brutally bad....first, too deep in the net, second, just bad).
Celebrating Pytor because he made a few good/great saves but lost the game due to giving up goals he shouldn't is similar to football fans who will say, my QB had 3 nice TD passes last night but ignore the fact that his 2 interceptions or a key fumble (ie Mayfield last night) cost their team the game.
Statistically (and these are facts/are not subjective....that's how I am viewing Pytor, who I rate very high as a person btw):
Pytor is ranked nicely for "high danger" saves (.835 save/80 percentile & 187 saves/87 percentile) but is dismal in mid-range and long-range shots (below 50 percentile) which validates the observations many of us have during in-game and post-game thoughts.
Details from NHL edge below (summary and then a picture of high, mid, long-range stats):
His GAA is 65 percentile, overall save % is Below 50, only 50% of his games does he deliver better than .900 save %.....that's not quality goaltending and would kill us in key games in the playoffs.
View attachment 960285
albeit from a rock-bottom price due to the 6-0 loss the day before
Thanks. When I look at those numbers for Gibson, it makes me think it's worth rolling the dice on Freddie coming back for this postseason and then finding a solution in the off-season to pair with Kochetkov in the future.This is Gibson's stats...my view, no thanks:
View attachment 960290
Freddie's 4 game sample this year and last year showcase a far superior goalie to Pytor (cough, game 6 excluded):Thanks. When I look at those numbers for Gibson, it makes me think it's worth rolling the dice on Freddie coming back for this postseason and then finding a solution in the off-season to pair with Kochetkov in the future.
When Freddie has played in the regular season the past 2 years, his numbers have been very good.
I do think Rod needs to accept that Kochetkov will also play in the postseason to give Freddie rest. No more of this "tandem ends in the regular season" BS. They play a tandem during the regular season; play the tandem in the playoffs. Especially if Freddie could get hurt at any moment and likely doesn't have his conditioning (shouldn't be as bad as last postseason, but still a concern.)
I like those numbers...Freddie's 4 game sample this year and last year showcase a far superior goalie to Pytor (cough, game 6 excluded):
View attachment 960297
From last year:
View attachment 960298
If I may quote Steve Dangle "If you give up three breakaways in about a 9 minute stretch, you're probably doing something wrong"Kooch is young and he’s playing like a young goalie typically plays. He gave up a questionable goal on a 2-on-1 to start the 3rd (though it was a hell of a shot over the shoulder), and then stop two more 2-on-1s in the following five minutes. And while it’s fair to say “Well, he should have stopped the one he allowed,” the bigger issue is probably “Why did the team give up three odd man rushes in a 1-0 game in a span of 6-7 minutes?”
My only thought in saying PK should have had this one is something that Tripp brought up that if he was thinking pass more than he should have been he was crouched a bit more to push. If he's standing 1/2 inch higher (which he might be if it's not a 2 on1) then it hits him more directly and stays out.gauthier's first goal was basically the same as jarvis' goal - with placement that perfect, no goalie is stopping those unless they do it accidentally.
this is why the playoffs are such a crapshoot. given the canes and devils have basically the exact same results to date (they're 1 point ahead, we've 1 game in hand) my takeaway from the goalie numbers is that the team in front of PK is better than the team in front of markstrom: TG=P where P is points, T is team play, and G is goalie play. If P is constant, increased G means decreased T. (unless strength of schedule is crazy different. i didn't look it up. this is the 'ideal hockey law' so it ignores some real world things just like my dear beloved PV=nRT.)this is why Devils could have an edge on us (Markstrom):
View attachment 960291
But he's a better goalie than anyone you could pick up at the deadline.Freddie IS a better goalie. The problem is that Freddie isn’t reliable health-wise to be useful to us. Case in point: Last night, PK obviously got hurt after a save. It was the scramble in the net during the 3rd period. It kept the puck out, but you could tell PK was laboring after that. If that was Freddie, we’d be getting a message on Wednesday about how “He’s dealing with something” and then a week later, we’d get the “Out for a while” quote from RBA,
Just sayin....For those wondering, the old number font works very well with the current reds
It’s not as nice as just going back to the old jerseys but I’d take this every day. The current numbers just don’t do it for me. Give me big fat easy to read numbersJust sayin....
I tuned in late last night -- did the whole team wear those jerseys during warmups or something?Just sayin....
YesI tuned in late last night -- did the whole team wear those jerseys during warmups or something?