That’s a slur , actually.Because we are run by FSG…a bunch of clueless Boston trust fund twats.
Sully’s from Massachusetts so they love him.
Honestly, more than one might think. Asking the Pens to retain $5mil for 2.5 years while using their last retention slot this year, that's only going to be done if there is an actual reason to do it. The next two TDLs are more realistic. Edmonton's in a tough spot too. They have their 1sts but very few worthwhile prospects. A 2025 1st + 2026 3rd + cap dump of your choosing for Karlsson @50% I could see being realistic. Why the 1st? Because I think retaining 50% on Pettersson could get us a 1st at the TDL. I'd rather save the retention slot for that unless someone is willing to give us a 1st in a Karlsson (or anyone else deal).What would Erik Karlsson 50% @ the deadline cost?
I think you'd be giving up one of your more prized prospects though. Nadeau, Blake, Drury, Morrow...Malkin to Canes could be interesting if he’d waive
It boggles the mind that the easiest and most obvious answer has never been tried first before all these roster turnovers.The core is old and tired. But also, way too comfortable. The answer is simple, fire the coach, see if that lights a fire under their asses and squeezes the last remaining good hockey out of them. No f***in way Dubas trades them into contendership.
Oh for sure, heck at that retention I'd want a 1st back. But doubt ownership is going to eat half his contract.Karl is moveable at %50, doubt Dubas does it though
Why? They didn’t for Jake and he had more value than Geno would at this point.I think you'd be giving up one of your more prized prospects though. Nadeau, Blake, Drury, Morrow...
Yeah but Malkin is Malkin and Jake was Jake. He's a core piece on and on our Mt Rushmore. Why would they trade him unless there was a significant incentive?Why? They didn’t for Jake and he had more value than Geno would at this point.
That’s why he won’t be traded.Yeah but Malkin is Malkin and Jake was Jake. He's a core piece on and on our Mt Rushmore. Why would they trade him unless there was a significant incentive?
No salary capWhat would it take to get Malkin @50% retained on the leafs
The idea that Dubas of all people could trade into contendership is also laughable. How many won trades would he need to make for that to happen? Like 4 at least? The dude didn’t win 4 roster trades in Toronto in 6 years. This smells of his ego running the team.It boggles the mind that the easiest and most obvious answer has never been tried first before all these roster turnovers.
But nope, I'm sure if you swap out this current bottom six for another 6 new players, that will finally fix things. Let's keep the same coach who hasn't won a playoff round since 2018 and who is going on 3 straight playoff misses. Yep, good plan Pens.
Karl is moveable at %50, doubt Dubas does it though
>> Traded the pick that became Sam Dickinson for Erik KarlssonAnd while Dubas has done well to replenish the pool with picks and prospects over the past year or so
Oh I thought he only had another year left. Yeah 2 more years to retain 50% is really doubtful, maybe next deadline then is more feasible.Honestly, more than one might think. Asking the Pens to retain $5mil for 2.5 years while using their last retention slot this year, that's only going to be done if there is an actual reason to do it. The next two TDLs are more realistic. Edmonton's in a tough spot too. They have their 1sts but very few worthwhile prospects. A 2025 1st + 2026 3rd + cap dump of your choosing for Karlsson @50% I could see being realistic. Why the 1st? Because I think retaining 50% on Pettersson could get us a 1st at the TDL. I'd rather save the retention slot for that unless someone is willing to give us a 1st in a Karlsson (or anyone else deal).
Yes, I would say that is accurate. Unless there was a "OMG we HAVE to do this" offer. A high end prospect would do it.That’s why he won’t be traded.
Other teams are not going to overpay for our nostalgia.
His even strength metrics were excellent last year, he was still very good. This year the whole team is just a total shitshow so it's tougher to judge.>> Traded the pick that became Sam Dickinson for Erik Karlsson
>> ???
Karlsson at 50% is definitely movable but there's no chance anyone is paying a 1st for him at this stage. He's not good.
I think it’s more like Kyle is passive aggressively trying to take a shot at some guys without having to actually say the words.Yes, I would say that is accurate. Unless there was a "OMG we HAVE to do this" offer. A high end prospect would do it.
While the tread is "everyone but 87" I would still interpet that as "87 is not available and it's highly unlikely that 71 is either".
If Dubas is smart he'll can Sullivan immediately to try and recoup some value on those guys.His even strength metrics were excellent last year, he was still very good. This year the whole team is just a total shitshow so it's tougher to judge.
Sully’s from Massachusetts so they love him.
I personally would consider Drury and pick(s). Blake is probably off limits entirely and the others would be closer but I don't really want to move them. Canes would not need retention, although with the state of the Pens maybe the Pens would want to retain to get more for him.Honestly, more than one might think. Asking the Pens to retain $5mil for 2.5 years while using their last retention slot this year, that's only going to be done if there is an actual reason to do it. The next two TDLs are more realistic. Edmonton's in a tough spot too. They have their 1sts but very few worthwhile prospects. A 2025 1st + 2026 3rd + cap dump of your choosing for Karlsson @50% I could see being realistic. Why the 1st? Because I think retaining 50% on Pettersson could get us a 1st at the TDL. I'd rather save the retention slot for that unless someone is willing to give us a 1st in a Karlsson (or anyone else deal).
I think you'd be giving up one of your more prized prospects though. Nadeau, Blake, Drury, Morrow...
Ya, as I figured, can't see ownership wanting to retain %50 and can't see anyone wanting him for any more than 5 mil, so Pens will get nothing and he'll walk back to Ottawa as a UFA in 2 years for his retirement contract, lolOh for sure, heck at that retention I'd want a 1st back. But doubt ownership is going to eat half his contract.