Dubas details his 'biggest mistake' as Leafs GM in new book

Canovin

1% is the new 11.5%
Oct 27, 2010
18,665
10,030
780
Not understanding it doesn't matter if Tavares is comparable to big 3 or not. Overpaying one guy will affect the whole team somehow. This doesn't just apply to the Leafs

If your GM and star players understand this, your cap structure become manageable
 

SEALBound

Fancy Gina Carano
Sponsor
Jun 13, 2010
41,754
20,226
In hindsight, yeah, dumb signing overall. But at the same time, imagine the backlash if he DOESN'T sign Tavaras. Imagine the Toronto fan and media reaction: O.M.G. you have a 1ov talent like Tavaras that wants to play for his boyhood team! OMG how could you not sign him! That's the kind of 1C franchise player you MAKE ROOM FOR! Huge opportunity missed! OMG if they don't win, it will be because of this!

I think for Tavaras, he was damned if he did and damned if he didn't.
 

sena

Registered User
Jul 3, 2024
11
19
Dubas "I dont need a number one center so I will spend 11 million on one"
Tells all his mistakes and lessons learned in a book
Goes to Pitts "I dont need a offensive PP quarterback Dman so I might as well spend 11 million on one"

yep still has no clue
 

GOilers88

#FreeMoustacheRides
Dec 24, 2016
14,759
22,065
Yup. Thats what he did but he isnt admitting it and claiming this as just a "mistake" of a new GM. This mistake is common knowledge, not nuance.

Very common in the corporate world to have short sighted executives making selfish decisions.
I'm not a Dubas fan, and I don't entirely disagree with you. But I think it's fair to appreciate that while it may look like a guy grasping at excuses, I don't think it's that unreasonable to look at it as a rookie GM legitimately making a mistake.

I strongly believe most GM's would attempt the same "mistake" if a star free agent, who grew up a fan of your team, hit the market and wanted to play for you. The contract itself sucked, sure. But we've seen countless teams sign big name players to contracts that don't age well. A contract not aging well is a far cry from a player and said contract not helping the team.

Likewise with his negotiating attempts with his core 3. I can legitimately see how a young, rookie GM in likely the biggest market in hockey could fumble a situation like that. I have 3 big up and comers, and adding an all star free agent to that seems like a no brainer. As a fan it's easy to sit here and critique things when I have zero attachment to a situation and the people and nuances involved in that situation. There's always a human element involved in stuff like this that fans are completely disconnected from.

I do think he probably learned some things and that were he to be in the same situation again things would probably play out differently, but maybe not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sundinisagod

Bounces R Way

Registered User
Nov 18, 2013
35,402
56,658
Weegartown
The biggest mistake related to Tavares was not the contract or the fallout (regarding the extensions for Matthews, Marner) but that he wasn't needed in the first place.

They had a #1 in AM, a #2 in Kadri and a #3 in Bozak. Not the greatest C depth in the league. So the day Tavares joined the Leafs he was a #2 (or would be very soon) making $11M. Nonsensical in a cap world.

Even worse, they had big holes on the blue line and in net. The two positions they absolutely did not need any help was at C and RW (Mitch, Willie, Kapanen).

Yup, this right here.

Dubas allocated 77 million to a position he already had filled. The Leafs had really done a lot right in their rebuild up until that contract. A top pairing RHD was the much more obvious need.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Beukeboom Fan

Aashir Mallik

Registered User
Apr 19, 2019
11,903
12,466
We knew this the day after the signings

Only took him like 4 years to figure it out

also, where’s the Tavares signing mentioning? Another grade A screw-up by him
 

GirardSpinorama

Registered User
Aug 20, 2004
21,451
10,403
I'm not a Dubas fan, and I don't entirely disagree with you. But I think it's fair to appreciate that while it may look like a guy grasping at excuses, I don't think it's that unreasonable to look at it as a rookie GM legitimately making a mistake.

I strongly believe most GM's would attempt the same "mistake" if a star free agent, who grew up a fan of your team, hit the market and wanted to play for you. The contract itself sucked, sure. But we've seen countless teams sign big name players to contracts that don't age well. A contract not aging well is a far cry from a player and said contract not helping the team.

Likewise with his negotiating attempts with his core 3. I can legitimately see how a young, rookie GM in likely the biggest market in hockey could fumble a situation like that. I have 3 big up and comers, and adding an all star free agent to that seems like a no brainer. As a fan it's easy to sit here and critique things when I have zero attachment to a situation and the people and nuances involved in that situation. There's always a human element involved in stuff like this that fans are completely disconnected from.

I do think he probably learned some things and that were he to be in the same situation again things would probably play out differently, but maybe not.
But did he learn though? He just acquired Erik karlsson, another big name piece as one of his first moves. A statement making splash. That contract isnt gonna end well. I dont at all believe his intentions, he seems arrogant as hell and doesnt deserve any excuse as a "young GM" of a big market. Wow, its a tough market but guess what, that also means he has the most resources in the NHL to be able to offer front loaded deals with bonuses.
 

LeafGrief

Shambles in my brain
Apr 10, 2015
7,766
9,913
Ottawa
The biggest mistake on the Leafs isn't the dollar values on their contracts. That's a contender for biggest mistake, don't get me wrong, but the real culprit for why we always lose in the first round is that the inmates run the asylum. Dubas hired Keefe, who never made the players accountable. Dubas was part of the decision to make Tavares Captain. Marner's ego is what functionally runs the team, and it's the weak leadership structures above and around the players that cause our core to crumble every year.

I'd love for us to have money for a goalie, or another top4 D, or whatever you could buy with better contracts for the big 4. But far, far shittier teams than us have won rounds, or even multiple rounds. If our problems were just that we had an extra PPG C for a few years instead of a better goalie and a 2RD, we'd have at least run some rounds. No, our problems are that our core are a bunch of basket cases when the other team play like meanies.

The mistake wasn't giving Tavares money and as a result giving extra money to Matthews and Marner, the mistake was giving Marner the keys to the kingdom and a coach who had to apologize on TV every time he said the core was kind of ass.
 

613Leafer

Registered User
May 26, 2008
13,011
3,937
While all true, Dubas couldn't have forecasted COVID-19 or the impact it had on the salary cap. Certainly not trying to excuse his decisions, but the stagnant cap made things a lot more difficult for teams without cap flexibility.

I honestly think that impact is exaggerated (I agree there was an impact, but I think it was pretty minor). All of our other signings over those flat cap years would have been more expensive had the cap been going up. So it's not as simple as saying we'd have the exact same roster + $5-10M extra capspace if the cap had risen ~$5-10M. Instead, take your pick of Kampf, Jarnkrok, Liljegren, Giordano, Simmonds, Samsonov, Engvall, Holl, Mikheyev, Rielly, etc - they each would have cost ~$100K-500K+ more than they did had the cap been rising.

His decisions around Tavares and those RFA contracts were highly problematic, regardless of the flat cap.
 

Eternal Leaf

Registered User
Jul 4, 2011
8,108
9,724
Toronto
The issue is the core never performed in line with their regular season exploits.

The cap structure was and is off but not enough for them to keep losing in the first or second round. They should still have been a team that goes deep even if it does not win the cup.

His biggest mistake was putting too much trust in a core that is flimsy when it matters and then the flat cap made it worse. Should have been more harsh with them and start cutting pieces from the core.
 

malcb33

Registered User
Apr 10, 2005
1,202
1,182
New Zealand
You shouldn't play with money you don't have.
So I take it you've never had a mortgage before...lol

Hindsight certainly makes a lot of people look smarter than they think. Dubas gambled on the rising cap, it didn't happen, and his plan failed. MLSE didn't adjust quick enough either IMO
 
  • Like
Reactions: Voight

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad