KarmaPolice
Snack enthusiast
Our offense is such a joke without McDavid and Drai that it would take such a crazy over-pay that no GM in their right mind would do it.
Last edited by a moderator:
I wasn't advocating for that trade but rather pointing out that your critique of it was incorrect. Your reply? "That's great but..." Typical blather.
It meets the requirements of your initial ask though... TT is a top-6 RW and Faulk is a good RHD. EA Sports says he's elite; heck, the Oil should add in that scenario!
They really aren't similar. Faulk is far more physical than Russell and much better defensively down low. Russell is better than Faulk positionally with his gap control in space. There's no offensive comparison between them. Don't see the comparison at all.No, Faulk strikes me as a more offensive Kris Russell when I see him. Wouldnt trade Drai for him in a package.
i like how LD who has hit 77 points once is a 75-80 point player but hamilton who has had more than 40 points the last 4 seasons and has hit 50 is just a 40 point player
also note that hes a dman.
interesting way to label these players
that also makes rask a 45-50 point player then
guess ignore the fact that hamilton is a 40+ pt dman, yeah
Faulk was very good defensively with Hainsey and Sekera, then not as much the last year or so but is back at that level this year. The fact that you have to ask is evidence that you're just winging it about Faulk's game. You don't like the deal fine, but your reasoning was based on erroneous info and know you are just adhering to pretzel logic.Faulk has been better this season than in previous seasons - true? ‘Better than Hamilton’ this season? If so, this is selling high. Or is that also blather?
Regardless, not a deal we’d entertain.
Are you under the impression Oiler forwards find it easy to score?
Faulk was very good defensively with Hainsey and Sekera, then not as much the last year or so but is back at that level this year. The fact that you have to ask is evidence that you're just winging it about Faulk's game. You don't like the deal fine, but your reasoning was based on erroneous info and know you are just adhering to pretzel logic.
Considering Aho>Draisaitl I am thinking no.something around Aho + Hamilton would be the ask.
oh yay a flames fan who is still hurt that Drai>Monohan.Considering Aho>Draisaitl I am thinking no.
LOL, and yet Monahan made the top 50 players list. Monahan would score 50+ goals riding McDavid's coattails.oh yay a flames fan who is still hurt that Drai>Monohan.
Really having trouble following along aren't you? Not a matter of his value but simply pointing out, convincingly I might add, you don't know his game. Past or present but that doesn't stop you from posting nonsense.If you’re that comfortable with Faulks play than I’m sure you’d have no problem swapping him out for Hamilton?
No one is fooled. Before this season many of you were soured on him too.
Anyway I don’t want this to devolve into yet another Faulk conversation and suffice it to say no Oiler fan will value Faulk the way you do so you’d better hang onto him.
Really having trouble following along aren't you? Not a matter of his value but simply pointing out, convincingly I might add, you don't know his game. Past or present but that doesn't stop you from posting nonsense.
Again not what I posted. It's a convincing and effective counter to your uninformed 25 game sample size argument, which is my only point. That is, that's he's better than your contention. You keep trying to switch it to an argument about value. It's one of credibility and you've proven to have a short supply of it on this topic.TIL that ‘actually no he’s good defensively except for that one year and as long as he has the right partner’ is a convincing argument.
I might look it up later if I feel like it but you should find Yost’s Faulk article. It’s a great read.
Forget Aho. Forget Slavin. Forget this thread.
Drasaitl isn't available. Full stop. He's ours and we aren't giving him up.
Again not what I posted. It's a convincing and effective counter to your uninformed 25 game sample size argument, which is my only point. That is, that's he's better than your contention. You keep trying to switch it to an argument about value. It's one of credibility and you've proven to have a short supply of it on this topic.
I love these Carolina gets a superstar but doesn't offer up Slavin.
Edmonton laughs at this proposal
So because you personally would take Aho over Drai, let's state "Oilers being Oilers" like that's supposed to mean something.
Lol, Calgary fans think Gaudreau is better than Kane and Monahan is a top 10 C"Superstar" ..... ooookay
Supposedly Hamilton was a top 10-15 defenseman before Carolina acquired him and I don't recall anybody ever putting Slavin ahead of him in terms of league rankings....now he's suddenly hot trash
(I personally don't think Hamilton's all that great, but whatevs)
You know full well he’s (Hamilton) in this deal because he hasn’t been what you’d hoped he’d be.
You can't even stay consistent with your own posts. Chaotic indeed.You didn’t post any argument with any facts whatsoever. All you said was he’s playing well with DeHaan and he’s good with the right partner. Swell. Good for him. I don’t care. I don’t want him and the posted deal is not even close. Hell SlavinAway even agreed with me before saying he’s been better than Hamilton this season... or 25 games, which is where that came from.
You want to talk credibility, don’t pretend you made some convincing statistical argument when all you did was disagree.
Right.... so you could attack me more, or you could just have a proper uncondescending discussion where you let me know what you think Aho does better than Draisaitl?