KillerMillerTime
Registered User
- Jun 30, 2019
- 7,148
- 8,794
I am worried about a trademark Sweneely reach at pick 4 Desnoyers or O'Brien for instance.
I wouldn't consider Caleb Desnoyers a huge reach at 4.
I am worried about a trademark Sweneely reach at pick 4 Desnoyers or O'Brien for instance.
His example makes it easier to get behind the idea. In this scenerio, the Bruins ask for permission to talk and make a pitch before making the trade. I dont know if it works like that ( i know it's been done before with NHL players ) but that is a lot better than rolling the dice, trading the first and then Howard not liking what the Bruins are selling and he goes to free agency.I mean I got shooed away for saying this exact thing this morning in the roster/cap thread. What the hell hahaha
I agree the nuisance of the hypothetical situation makes it easier to like. My question was simply would you give a first for the player, which is done in both scenarios.His example makes it easier to get behind the idea. In this scenerio, the Bruins ask for permission to talk and make a pitch before making the trade. I dont know if it works like that ( i know it's been done before with NHL players ) but that is a lot better than rolling the dice, trading the first and then Howard not liking what the Bruins are selling and he goes to free agency.
Upon seeing many more highlights, kid has everything, but it will take four or five years for it all to develop, particularly skating. I did change my mind a bit and like him better than Hagens in the long run. He is only just 18, so four development years seems about right.I agree the nuisance of the hypothetical situation makes it easier to like. My question was simply would you give a first for the player, which is done in both scenarios.
I guess I just wanted to get a gauge on people’s thoughts of the player haha cause I liked him a lot at the WJC. Good left handed, shot first guy. Produced at almost every level he’s played at. I think it would be a good fit.
He also excels in the bumper position on the PP. which is another need for this team.
I’m very excited about a lot of these players at the top of the draft and I think Desnoyers would be a great Bruin.Upon seeing many more highlights, kid has everything, but it will take four or five years for it all to develop, particularly skating. I did change my mind a bit and like him better than Hagens in the long run. He is only just 18, so four development years seems about right.
I mean yeah. I didn’t say he doesn’t have it? I just think Hagens has it in spades over really anyone in this draft IMO.Doesn’t a “pro-style game” also include creativity in play?
I agree the nuisance of the hypothetical situation makes it easier to like. My question was simply would you give a first for the player, which is done in both scenarios.
I guess I just wanted to get a gauge on people’s thoughts of the player haha cause I liked him a lot at the WJC. Good left handed, shot first guy. Produced at almost every level he’s played at. I think it would be a good fit.
He also excels in the bumper position on the PP. which is another need for this team.
I guess i just dont really believe in schaefer then. Im not really a huge believer in anyone specifically in this draft so far. I think the top 5-8 guys in this draft have a legitimate shot at being the best player from it, so with that in mind i pick the one that plays a position i need.
- Bruins jump up to #1, draft Misa
- Bruins trade the Leafs 2026 1st round for Howard, who signs an ELC
- Bruins offer sheet Knies, 7x8. Leafs fail to match
I can get behind that offseason.
In this scenario, wouldn’t you rather want Marner instead of Knies? Howard is shot first and is left handed LW, Misa is a LW/C - “do it all”. I would think I would rather have Marner as a right handed RW distributor and play driver of that second line long term.- Bruins jump up to #1, draft Misa
- Bruins trade the Leafs 2026 1st round for Howard, who signs an ELC
- Bruins offer sheet Knies, 7x8. Leafs fail to match
I can get behind that offseason.
I think O'Brien is a lot closer to Desnoyers and Frondell then being given credit for. Have read a lot of scouting reports on him and his north/south playmaking is his strength, and every month his defensive game gets better. There are some questions about his true ceiling as a top 6 center as late as mid March, but I could see the Bruins liking him in that same 5-7 group.Anyone have a good read on O'Brien? Been meaning to watch some of his games. There are better centers in the draft but he's interesting.
I think if he was a better skater, he would be in their tier. Here’s a pretty decent scouting report video on him that I shared pretty much the same feelings on the player:I think O'Brien is a lot closer to Desnoyers and Frondell then being given credit for. Have read a lot of scouting reports on him and his north/south playmaking is his strength, and every month his defensive game gets better. There are some questions about his true ceiling as a top 6 center as late as mid March, but I could see the Bruins liking him in that same 5-7 group.
Yup agree - he’s kinda an unknown to me but he’s getting a lot of love - we end up 4OA be interesting to see if he’s threeJust going by the YouTube clips I’ve seen of all the top draft picks, Frondell intrigued me the most.
Granted Ive no experience other than being a fan, but I think Frondell looked damn good.
I'd do it .. he's regressed a little as the league has figured him out but better for a rebuild than a green draft pick...although Martone (however you spell it) at 4 OA would also be a good choice... ...Yup agree - he’s kinda an unknown to me but he’s getting a lot of love - we end up 4OA be interesting to see if he’s three
Game playing
1. Schneider
2. Misa
3. Frondell
Who we take
Second scenario that’s just messing around
Bruins get 4 OA and Seattle offers Matty Berniers for it
He’s 22 he’s signed long term and he’s very good
Curious do you do it
I would at least try to also get back their 2nd rounder with him, but yeah, I would probably still do it without the 2nd.Yup agree - he’s kinda an unknown to me but he’s getting a lot of love - we end up 4OA be interesting to see if he’s three
Game playing
1. Schneider
2. Misa
3. Frondell
Who we take
Second scenario that’s just messing around
Bruins get 4 OA and Seattle offers Matty Berniers for it
He’s 22 he’s signed long term and he’s very good
Curious do you do it
Yup agree - he’s kinda an unknown to me but he’s getting a lot of love - we end up 4OA be interesting to see if he’s three
Game playing
1. Schneider
2. Misa
3. Frondell
Who we take
Second scenario that’s just messing around
Bruins get 4 OA and Seattle offers Matty Berniers for it
He’s 22 he’s signed long term and he’s very good
Curious do you do it
Very good idea. You get a very good young player with potential who is already playing in the NHL on a position you have a need of. . The questions are, has the player you could take with the fourth overall a higher potential to be better in the future and is Beniers really the young center you should aim for.
This is a cap league
Cap space/elc’s are worth gold
If they trade their 1st for a player already played it’s extremely difficult to build a contender around that
Pasta, Swayman, McAvoy are all getting already paid top dollar
Yes but Beniers isn´t really expensive at 7 millions per until 2031. With the rising cap it´s not that much of a factor. Getting a young top six center right now acclerates the retool and is a huge advantage in using the prime of Pastrnak, Swayman and McAvoy. I still think it´s a thought you can consider. In the worst case you pick a player who isn´t ready to be a NHL regular until in a few years. Giving up the pick and getting help now could be a huge factor in getting back into the playoffs next year.
I could never see this happening not at all, but if it ever were too, Id fax the paper work before Francis could change his mind.Yup agree - he’s kinda an unknown to me but he’s getting a lot of love - we end up 4OA be interesting to see if he’s three
Game playing
1. Schneider
2. Misa
3. Frondell
Who we take
Second scenario that’s just messing around
Bruins get 4 OA and Seattle offers Matty Berniers for it
He’s 22 he’s signed long term and he’s very good
Curious do you do it
In this scenario, wouldn’t you rather want Marner instead of Knies? Howard is shot first and is left handed LW, Misa is a LW/C - “do it all”. I would think I would rather have Marner as a right handed RW distributor and play driver of that second line long term.
Geekie - Lindholm - Pasta
Howard - Misa - Marner
Khusnutdinov - Minten - Lysell
Lauko - Kastellic - Duran
Now THATS a rebuild. I think a flaw of that team is that you’re very small and might lack grit in the middle 6.
Would still have your other assets to continue to improve in all your 1st rounders, Marchand pick, Poitras on the door step, and Dans Locmelis to push Lindholm out of 1C![]()
Exactly this, Taking the BPA is not about what that draft pick does next year. You take the player, you hope can give you 10 solid years as an NHL player.I wouldn't be penciling in any draft pick into next year's lineup just now. No need to rush things unless they force themselves.