Toggle sidebar

Draft and UDFA Thread 2017-18

  • Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Oscar Lindberg said:
Seems Butcher was seen with a Sabres bag on twitter, so I assume he went with them

Still waiting to see what happens with Kerfoot. There hasn't been any news about him other than he had a productive meeting with the Canucks
Click to expand...

Link?

This is like...on the same level as Babcock and the MLSE plane before he got hired.

EDIT: NVM, I found it.

 
Not sure Kerfoot is an immediate NHLer but he'd have as good a shot to make the roster here as anywhere else. He certainly was outshined by Vesey's skating and power in the games I watched Harvard play the past few seasons.

Some competition for Andersson in camp would be welcome.
 
Can't say I really disagree with the top five. Maybe I'd slide Tkachuk up to four; he possibly finishes as high as three, depending on how his offense translates. But I don't see the 1-2 changing unless someone dramatically falls.
 
Mittelstadt Nemesis said:
Not sure Kerfoot is an immediate NHLer but he'd have as good a shot to make the roster here as anywhere else. He certainly was outshined by Vesey's skating and power in the games I watched Harvard play the past few seasons.

Some competition for Andersson in camp would be welcome.
Click to expand...

Well apparently Kerfoot agrees...

Brooks with the story that Rangers are finalists

http://nypost.com/2017/08/21/rangers-a-finalist-for-harvard-stud-who-would-be-perfect-fit/
 
Werbrik looks like he could Johansen's younger brother.

search
 
Tkachuk and Hughes are the two guys I'm most interested in seeing this season.

Dahlin is an absolute stud.

Personally, at this point, I like Svechnikov better than Boqvist.
 
Edge said:
Tkachuk and Hughes are the two guys I'm most interested in seeing this season.

Dahlin is an absolute stud.

Personally, at this point, I like Svechnikov better than Boqvist.
Click to expand...

Agreed, and I think that'll become more and more obvious as the year progresses.
 
I give him credit it for putting his thoughts out there.

It's a thankless job and one that proves you wrong pretty often, even if you're the brightest mind in the room.

And it's free. If you want detailed, in-depth analysis, that more often than not ends up with roughly the same accuracy when all is said and done, you're going to pay for it.
 
Edge said:
I give him credit it for putting his thoughts out there.

It's a thankless job and one that proves you wrong pretty often, even if you're the brightest mind in the room.

And it's free. If you want detailed, in-depth analysis, that more often than not ends up with roughly the same accuracy when all is said and done, you're going to pay for it.
Click to expand...

Absolutely, I'm not going to be all too critical because I realize everyone has different opinions and he works hard, I just can't say that I agree with much of what he says usually.
 
Edge said:
I give him credit it for putting his thoughts out there.

It's a thankless job and one that proves you wrong pretty often, even if you're the brightest mind in the room.

And it's free. If you want detailed, in-depth analysis, that more often than not ends up with roughly the same accuracy when all is said and done, you're going to pay for it.
Click to expand...

Agreed with this. I, too, don't agree with him often, but it does help point out the players that most likely get drafted on draft day. I don't think, I've seen a player on his lists go undrafted, recently.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Top Bottom