Prospect Info: Draft 2025 Habs your on the clock

[HespelerGreenFlash]

BPA is just "don't screw up." No one complains that Romanov wasn't BPA anymore, though there was some griping at the time. The first 5 to 10 picks are more and more reliable every year, so it's pretty risky to reach with really early picks, but once you are into the teens you have to hope your scouts know more than the media, and that you know the player that will help your team. Even with that there are years like the Slaf pick where there was no consensus at the time, and not much now. Cooley looks good, as does Nazar, but the habs didn't really have space for another small forward, though either could have replaced Newhook. Slaf has been up and down.

Taking KK when he wasn't really in the discussion was a reach, compounded by bad development. McCarron was a reach because they could probably have taken him a round or two later. Taking one of 5 guys ranked in the teens at 16 or 17 is not a reach, unless you are passing up Caufield. I doubt you need to worry much about BPA or anything else by the end of the second round because any player who makes it will have developed so much that he is unrecognizable from draft day.

The habs have often failed in the draft chasing big players, since the last cup, and been successful with small guys who dropped. They need to find a few good big players, and they can't really play another small D, but they shouldn't pass on an elite small forward.

Reminds one of the time we took Wickenheiser and slid on Denis Savard

 

[sampollock]

Still wanting Malcolm Spence.

There's other id take but I doubt they drop.

Take a chance on him

 

[Team_Spirit]

Sup Dawgs

 

[Vachon23]

I wonder if Boston could be interested to move down to get more prospect since there prospect pool is tin

 

[LaP]

Never forget Tom Wilson was a 16th overall pick. Unless you get a player with a similar impact than Wilson in his prime (26ish) then it's not worth trading the picks. Trading the picks to patch a short term hole would be a mistake.

 

[CauZuki]

My bet is we trade both for something good.

 

[Walksss]

I wonder if a trade of 17th, 41st, Adam Engstrom and Arber Xhekaj to Seattle for 8th would work. I feel like they're looking for toughness and prospect depth at D and they might still be able to get their guy in the middle 1st. This also helps us to move out a few prospects before the inevitable next expansion draft which is not too far away.

Draft Roger McQueen, Brady Martin, or Jake O'Brien there at 8 and sign Gavrikov to make up for the loss of those young Dmen. Tidy piece of business.

 

[Quatre Vingt Treize]

Aitchenson won't see NHL ice time before 3-4 years so that's not a factor at all.

But it all depends on who's the 2C, I'd want someone 25 and younger and proven for Guhle.

Would you move him for McTavish?

 

[Hoochi Papa]

The Canadiens need new prospects in the pipeline. I guarantee there will be head-scratching moments in the first round, and I wouldn't be surprised to see a 10th-12th overall ranked player fall into Hughes' lap. Just don't trade them for another overpriced redemption project. Two consecutive picks is a good position to be in. Pick a highly-ranked player and your guy. And don't let the play-offs fool you into thinking we need size above everything else. Unless it's a talented player with size.

 

[SpeedyPotato]

Before drafting Simashev, Utah wanted Reinbacher, I wonder if a Reinbacher deal perhaps with an add-on could get us the 4th pick which probably gets us one of Desnoyers or Hagens

I would not be against such a trade simply based on DRs injury history but high odds, Utah would feel the same way now.

I’m not trading Reinbacher straight up for that pick. You got an almost NHL ready 6’3 RD who not only fits an organization need but is a super rare commodity with his skating ability and decent offensive ability. I’m not trading him for an 18 yo potential 2nd line center who’s 3 years away from maybe making an impact.

 

[Habs Icing]

Before drafting Simashev, Utah wanted Reinbacher, I wonder if a Reinbacher deal perhaps with an add-on could get us the 4th pick which probably gets us one of Desnoyers or Hagens

I would not be against such a trade simply based on DRs injury history but high odds, Utah would feel the same way now.

I want to understand your reasoning.

The Habs need both a 2C and a RHD. Reinbacher has been developed for two years. Now you suggest we trade our possible RHD prospect for a 2C who will be one or two years behind. You haven't really done anything to fill the two holes we have on the Habs.

Now, why are you willing to do that? Is it because Reinbacher's injuries frighten you? Or is it because you don't think he'll fill our RHD needs?

 

[SpeedyPotato]

I wonder if a trade of 17th, 41st, Adam Engstrom and Arber Xhekaj to Seattle for 8th would work. I feel like they're looking for toughness and prospect depth at D and they might still be able to get their guy in the middle 1st. This also helps us to move out a few prospects before the inevitable next expansion draft which is not too far away.

Draft Roger McQueen, Brady Martin, or Jake O'Brien there at 8 and sign Gavrikov to make up for the loss of those young Dmen. Tidy piece of business.

That’s way too much to give up to move up 9 spots

 

[Doublechin]

I want to understand your reasoning.

The Habs need both a 2C and a RHD. Reinbacher has been developed for two years. Now you suggest we trade our possible RHD prospect for a 2C who will be one or two years behind. You haven't really done anything to fill the two holes we have on the Habs.

Now, why are you willing to do that? Is it because Reinbacher's injuries frighten you? Or is it because you don't think he'll fill our RHD needs?

My reasoning is simplez the knee injury and the game he plays, my total value for him has dropped a bit, I also don't think trade happens but mainly because Utah wouldn't accept and go for their guy

 

[WeThreeKings]

Can someone fix the thread title?

you're*

 

[salbutera]

Before drafting Simashev, Utah wanted Reinbacher, I wonder if a Reinbacher deal perhaps with an add-on could get us the 4th pick which probably gets us one of Desnoyers or Hagens

I would not be against such a trade simply based on DRs injury history but high odds, Utah would feel the same way now.

This is the first draft class in ages when none of the projected 1st rounders are expected to be ready to play in NHL next season - it’s a testament to the weakness of this draft cuvée relative to last 20-25 years.

 

[Naslundforever]

The Canadiens need new prospects in the pipeline. I guarantee there will be head-scratching moments in the first round, and I wouldn't be surprised to see a 10th-12th overall ranked player fall into Hughes' lap. Just don't trade them for another overpriced redemption project. Two consecutive picks is a good position to be in. Pick a highly-ranked player and your guy. And don't let the play-offs fool you into thinking we need size above everything else. Unless it's a talented player with size.

I’d trade them both with package for an impact player (even older), or draft if it fails. No in-between.. team has been one of the worst in the nhl 4 consecutive seasons and a half, miraculously made the playoffs on their last game… Adding mid players to a (not even) average team won’t move the needle, except take everyone nearer retirement..

Habs have craps to trade outside their underage nhl core + Fowler in the ahl so those picks might be what org needs to get a trade done. Being so young they can skip a draft year imo.

 

[SpeedyPotato]

My reasoning is simplez the knee injury and the game he plays, my total value for him has dropped a bit, I also don't think trade happens but mainly because Utah wouldn't accept and go for their guy

Utah would make that deal yesterday and it’s not even close. Now maybe Reinbacher doesn’t become that top pairing guy in hindsight, but his value as an NHL ready prospect at a premium position is 100% higher than anyone not named Schaefer or Misa in this draft.