Martone >>> Desnoyers and JOBTrading up to #4 to guarantee getting a quality center makes a lot of sense for where this organization is at.
Discussions around guys like Eklund, Smith, Bear, etc are all good and well given that we are picking #11 currently, but the fact is - this organization needs a legit, future top 6 center in the worst way possible. It can not be expressed hard enough how weak that area is for us.
I support trading up to get one of Frondell, Desnoyers, JOB, or Martin (provided Schaeffer, Misa, and Hagens go 1-3).
I would tend to agree...but...Martone >>> Desnoyers and JOB
Id be on board for something along the lines of Rust and #11 for #4.Trading up to #4 to guarantee getting a quality center makes a lot of sense for where this organization is at.
Discussions around guys like Eklund, Smith, Bear, etc are all good and well given that we are picking #11 currently, but the fact is - this organization needs a legit, future top 6 center in the worst way possible. It can not be expressed hard enough how weak that area is for us.
I support trading up to get one of Frondell, Desnoyers, JOB, or Martin (provided Schaeffer, Misa, and Hagens go 1-3).
I don't think it really matters. Like if they hit their absolute peaks, I would rather have Corey Perry than Ryan O'Reilly even if ROR is a C.I would tend to agree...but...
Need for center >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Need for Wing
You can get a lot more for Rust and the #11 pick than just the #4 pick.Id be on board for something along the lines of Rust and #11 for #4.
Is he though? Late first and an okay prospect? Sure. That package maybe gets you into the early to mid 20s in the draft. So lets say 11th and 22nd. That isnt getting you 4th.You can get a lot more for Rust and the #11 pick than just the #4 pick.
Rust alone is worth a first round pick and more.
Rust’s main value imo is getting a young player back…so Rust and Pens #11 pick say should get us Buffalo’s #9 pick and Byram for example…anything short of that is selling Rust short…he’s a consistent 50-60 point player on a very good contract, and Buffalo can’t get any free agents to sign there lolIs he though? Late first and an okay prospect? Sure. That package maybe gets you into the early to mid 20s in the draft. So lets say 11th and 22nd. That isnt getting you 4th.
The value of the 4th overall is difficult to project because no one has traded up to that point in the draft in well over a decade. But Rust's value is pretty well established.Is he though? Late first and an okay prospect? Sure. That package maybe gets you into the early to mid 20s in the draft. So lets say 11th and 22nd. That isnt getting you 4th.
Why would the Sabres do that? Byram is probably more valuable than Rust at the moment. Seems like downgrades on both the player and pick. Not that I would be against a Rust/Byram swap.Rust’s main value imo is getting a young player back…so Rust and Pens #11 pick say should get us Buffalo’s #9 pick and Byram for example…anything short of that is selling Rust short…he’s a consistent 50-60 point player on a very good contract, and Buffalo can’t get any free agents to sign there lol
Because Byram is still a highly skilled but somewhat unfinished commodity at a position of abundance for the Sabres, while Rust is a guaranteed veteran producer for a team desperate to win.Why would the Sabres do that? Byram is probably more valuable than Rust at the moment. Seems like downgrades on both the player and pick. Not that I would be against a Rust/Byram swap.
Because Byram is still a highly skilled but somewhat unfinished commodity at a position of abundance for the Sabres, while Rust is a guaranteed veteran producer for a team desperate to win.
Why would the Sabres do that? Byram is probably more valuable than Rust at the moment. Seems like downgrades on both the player and pick. Not that I would be against a Rust/Byram swap.
Yeah, I can't get on board with that. I don't think it's a stretch to say that Barkov is more important than Tkachuk or that Lindell is more important than Marchand or that McDrai (either) is more important than Hyman.I don't think it really matters. Like if they hit their absolute peaks, I would rather have Corey Perry than Ryan O'Reilly even if ROR is a C.
Buffalo has publicly stated that they want veteran talent to help their younger players learn to win. Rust - or Rakell - is a better fit than one would think.Not disagreeing with that. But a younger 1st pairing defenseman is more valuable than an older 1st line winger. Rust doesnt really fit their team age wise. If Rust was 4-5 years younger I think the value is about even, but hes not. He has a NMC until July 1 with also probably makes this a mote point. Though I guess you could tell him to waive now cause hes going July 2nd whether he wants to or not.
This Puckpedia tool is pretty useful. I think Rust could get about #17 overall on his own from the right team. I don't think any of Rust/Rakell/Karlsson make sense for Utah though. I think the earliest they could move up for a reasonable price would be #8. Maybe a deal with Vancouver (#16) could be made to package to Utah.You can get a lot more for Rust and the #11 pick than just the #4 pick.
Rust alone is worth a first round pick and more.
Why wouldn't Rakell or Rust make sense for Utah?This Puckpedia tool is pretty useful. I think Rust could get about #17 overall on his own from the right team. I don't think any of Rust/Rakell/Karlsson make sense for Utah though. I think the earliest they could move up for a reasonable price would be #8. Maybe a deal with Vancouver (#16) could be made to package to Utah.
View attachment 1048916
Yes. But more on the lines of someone in the mid to late 20s and not mid 30s.Buffalo has publicly stated that they want veteran talent to help their younger players learn to win. Rust - or Rakell - is a better fit than one would think.
Because they're older and the Utah core is 21-26. With #4, they can make serious offers for Peterka or Robertson. UFAs in Marner, Ehlers, Boeser also make more sense. Dreger just today said Utah will be trying hard for Marner at least. Maybe taking back and undesirable contract from them (Kerfoot?) could offset the age risk of Rust or Rakell.Why wouldn't Rakell or Rust make sense for Utah?
It's semantics, but Rust is only 32.Yes. But more on the lines of someone in the mid to late 20s and not mid 30s.
He turned 33 on May 11th.It's semantics, but Rust is only 32.