The reality is that we’re only now starting to see the impact of the enforcer culture that existed between the late 70s through the 2000s.
We don’t really have a good benchmark prior to that time period, and we won’t know how the 2010s and beyond will look for another 20 years or so.
Now having said that, I think we also have to take into account some of the circumstances surrounding the enforcers who have passed.
Some of them battled some serious drug problems or had significant issues away from the rink. Those seem to be the names that are popping up the most. Additionally, we don’t know the true percentage of enforcers who have or will develop problems as a result of their role in the NHL.
There are likely many non-enforcers who actually took as much, or maybe even more punishment as a result of the amount of time they played and the punishment they received.
But this is all something that deserves serious monitoring and evaluating.