Management - Don Sweeney extended 2 years | Page 21 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

Management Don Sweeney extended 2 years

0.0 he’s fired

Athletic polls over years had Sweeney top 5 multiple times by fellow executives but same yrs Bruins fans weighing in 24-29

If the Bruins collective fans ran the Bruins they would be worse then Buffalo last 14 years

But it’s all good fun reading the insane posts

Team would have folded 4 times and be playing in the Iron League of Serbia; 10th division.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dennis Bonvie
Tomorrow’s Globe:


The old email box lit up with requisite spit and furor on Tuesday once Bruins president Cam Neelytacked that two-year extension on Don Sweeney’scontract as the Black and Gold general manager.

Globe Bruins writer Jim McBride’s report, with comments from Neely published later in the day, reflected similar ire among the 200-plus reader comments.

The first three off the top:
“This will be Neely’s undoing.”

“Just dumb.”

“Unfortunately, neither of them is going anywhere in the near future.”

Full disclosure, the second posting submitted was deemed just a little too rough around the adjectives, forcing Globe censors to block it. For others, take a look here.

Oh, it’s summertime, and the living in the Hub of Hockey is anything but easy.

The paramount point to keep in mind about Sweeney’s new deal: Neely and Sweeney are going over their list, and going over it again, in their search for a new coach. A GM working on an expiring contract would require Super Slick Salesman of the Decade status to pull a new bench boss in off the street and convince him to sign on the dotted line for, say, 3-5 years.

Any prospective new guy worth his white socks and waffle-soled shoes would be wont to say, “Right, so, uh, you’ll show me how to shut down the Zamboni when you get marched out of the Garden in March?”

Sweeney now has two more years of pay to pocket and, more important in this moment of Bruins business, two added years of job security as a tool that will help him encourage someone to take over his bench. We know that new guy won’t be Mike Sullivan (Rangers), Joel Quenneville(Ducks), or Rick Tocchet (Flyers). That trio landed new gigs prior to Neely granting Sweeney the extension/hiring aid.

It’s a Bruins bench, by the way, that lacks a captain, and one that remains in dire need of Sweeney adding 2-3 legit scorers to the top-six forward group for the Bruins to get back in the Stanley Cup-dreaming biz.

A true power-play QB would help, too, though that job has been a work in progress as far back as when then-coach Claude Julien took the big heater out of Zdeno Chara’shands. That was (checks notes) 10 years ago, when Sweeney took office. It takes time to find the right guy.

If Sweeney makes it through the extension — and succeeds in withstanding the fandom’s wrath — he will have completed 13 years on the job, dating to 2015. He’ll also be on the verge of his 62nd birthday, as well as some 44 years removed from the 1984 draft, when the Bruins culled him out of the eighth round, pick No. 166.

If the Bruins during Sweeney’s decision-making tenure routinely, or even occasionally, unearthed such gems hidden so late in the draft, oh how different might the narrative be pertaining to his front office legacy.

A decade into Sweeney’s shot-calling tour, the draft, the draft, the draft remains the biggest smudge on his curriculum vitae, and the one that ultimately could bump him off the job in these next 36 months. Which is to say, in part, he needs to make a score with that No. 7 pickcurrently in his pocket.

Far more relevant to Sweeney’s immediate future as clerk of the works is that coaching decision, along with how he builds out the roster this summer — be it by trades and/or free agency. Those are the underlying factors that will determine his success and, most likely, his legacy.

The bigger surprise Tuesday, by the view here from high up in the courtside ref’s chair, was the degree of negative fan reaction over the extension. Really, folks, what were you thinking? What did you think was going to happen?

CEO Charlie Jacobs and Neely, in the end-of-season autopsy five weeks ago, granted Sweeney the gold card to move the franchise forward. They framed it by saying he earned the opportunity, through past work, to make the necessary fixes. Neely that day said he would need time to consider extending Sweeney, but c‘mon, as sure as water freezes at 32 degrees, the former defenseman who wore No. 32 had that extension iced before he ambled to the podium late on the morning of April 23. Keeping meant extending him.

Again, the coach is nonexistent. The player talent is too spotty, uneven. The fan base is frayed, their loyalty worn thinner than their wallets, which they’ve been asked to open wider yet again to cover the average 13 percent season-ticket price hike over these last two seasons. (Remember, those usury-like utility bills!)

Once the decision was made to retain Sweeney as Mr. Fix-It, the extension was a fait accompli. It was formalized Tuesday in order to get him out there and nail down a coach, and then to convince free agents, mulling packages worth in the tens of millions of dollars, that Boston is the place to play, raise families, maybe win the Stanley Cup.

They already gave Sweeney the job, and assured everyone he was their guy. They had no choice but to put him in position to make good.
 
Tomorrow’s Globe:


The old email box lit up with requisite spit and furor on Tuesday once Bruins president Cam Neelytacked that two-year extension on Don Sweeney’scontract as the Black and Gold general manager.

Globe Bruins writer Jim McBride’s report, with comments from Neely published later in the day, reflected similar ire among the 200-plus reader comments.

The first three off the top:
“This will be Neely’s undoing.”

“Just dumb.”

“Unfortunately, neither of them is going anywhere in the near future.”

Full disclosure, the second posting submitted was deemed just a little too rough around the adjectives, forcing Globe censors to block it. For others, take a look here.

Oh, it’s summertime, and the living in the Hub of Hockey is anything but easy.

The paramount point to keep in mind about Sweeney’s new deal: Neely and Sweeney are going over their list, and going over it again, in their search for a new coach. A GM working on an expiring contract would require Super Slick Salesman of the Decade status to pull a new bench boss in off the street and convince him to sign on the dotted line for, say, 3-5 years.

Any prospective new guy worth his white socks and waffle-soled shoes would be wont to say, “Right, so, uh, you’ll show me how to shut down the Zamboni when you get marched out of the Garden in March?”

Sweeney now has two more years of pay to pocket and, more important in this moment of Bruins business, two added years of job security as a tool that will help him encourage someone to take over his bench. We know that new guy won’t be Mike Sullivan (Rangers), Joel Quenneville(Ducks), or Rick Tocchet (Flyers). That trio landed new gigs prior to Neely granting Sweeney the extension/hiring aid.

It’s a Bruins bench, by the way, that lacks a captain, and one that remains in dire need of Sweeney adding 2-3 legit scorers to the top-six forward group for the Bruins to get back in the Stanley Cup-dreaming biz.

A true power-play QB would help, too, though that job has been a work in progress as far back as when then-coach Claude Julien took the big heater out of Zdeno Chara’shands. That was (checks notes) 10 years ago, when Sweeney took office. It takes time to find the right guy.

If Sweeney makes it through the extension — and succeeds in withstanding the fandom’s wrath — he will have completed 13 years on the job, dating to 2015. He’ll also be on the verge of his 62nd birthday, as well as some 44 years removed from the 1984 draft, when the Bruins culled him out of the eighth round, pick No. 166.

If the Bruins during Sweeney’s decision-making tenure routinely, or even occasionally, unearthed such gems hidden so late in the draft, oh how different might the narrative be pertaining to his front office legacy.

A decade into Sweeney’s shot-calling tour, the draft, the draft, the draft remains the biggest smudge on his curriculum vitae, and the one that ultimately could bump him off the job in these next 36 months. Which is to say, in part, he needs to make a score with that No. 7 pickcurrently in his pocket.

Far more relevant to Sweeney’s immediate future as clerk of the works is that coaching decision, along with how he builds out the roster this summer — be it by trades and/or free agency. Those are the underlying factors that will determine his success and, most likely, his legacy.

The bigger surprise Tuesday, by the view here from high up in the courtside ref’s chair, was the degree of negative fan reaction over the extension. Really, folks, what were you thinking? What did you think was going to happen?

CEO Charlie Jacobs and Neely, in the end-of-season autopsy five weeks ago, granted Sweeney the gold card to move the franchise forward. They framed it by saying he earned the opportunity, through past work, to make the necessary fixes. Neely that day said he would need time to consider extending Sweeney, but c‘mon, as sure as water freezes at 32 degrees, the former defenseman who wore No. 32 had that extension iced before he ambled to the podium late on the morning of April 23. Keeping meant extending him.

Again, the coach is nonexistent. The player talent is too spotty, uneven. The fan base is frayed, their loyalty worn thinner than their wallets, which they’ve been asked to open wider yet again to cover the average 13 percent season-ticket price hike over these last two seasons. (Remember, those usury-like utility bills!)

Once the decision was made to retain Sweeney as Mr. Fix-It, the extension was a fait accompli. It was formalized Tuesday in order to get him out there and nail down a coach, and then to convince free agents, mulling packages worth in the tens of millions of dollars, that Boston is the place to play, raise families, maybe win the Stanley Cup.

They already gave Sweeney the job, and assured everyone he was their guy. They had no choice but to put him in position to make good.
Thanks for posting they are behind it paywall and it's a pain to clear cache every time I want to look at an article.
 
Tomorrow’s Globe:


The old email box lit up with requisite spit and furor on Tuesday once Bruins president Cam Neelytacked that two-year extension on Don Sweeney’scontract as the Black and Gold general manager.

Globe Bruins writer Jim McBride’s report, with comments from Neely published later in the day, reflected similar ire among the 200-plus reader comments.

The first three off the top:
“This will be Neely’s undoing.”

“Just dumb.”

“Unfortunately, neither of them is going anywhere in the near future.”

Full disclosure, the second posting submitted was deemed just a little too rough around the adjectives, forcing Globe censors to block it. For others, take a look here.

Oh, it’s summertime, and the living in the Hub of Hockey is anything but easy.

The paramount point to keep in mind about Sweeney’s new deal: Neely and Sweeney are going over their list, and going over it again, in their search for a new coach. A GM working on an expiring contract would require Super Slick Salesman of the Decade status to pull a new bench boss in off the street and convince him to sign on the dotted line for, say, 3-5 years.

Any prospective new guy worth his white socks and waffle-soled shoes would be wont to say, “Right, so, uh, you’ll show me how to shut down the Zamboni when you get marched out of the Garden in March?”

Sweeney now has two more years of pay to pocket and, more important in this moment of Bruins business, two added years of job security as a tool that will help him encourage someone to take over his bench. We know that new guy won’t be Mike Sullivan (Rangers), Joel Quenneville(Ducks), or Rick Tocchet (Flyers). That trio landed new gigs prior to Neely granting Sweeney the extension/hiring aid.

It’s a Bruins bench, by the way, that lacks a captain, and one that remains in dire need of Sweeney adding 2-3 legit scorers to the top-six forward group for the Bruins to get back in the Stanley Cup-dreaming biz.

A true power-play QB would help, too, though that job has been a work in progress as far back as when then-coach Claude Julien took the big heater out of Zdeno Chara’shands. That was (checks notes) 10 years ago, when Sweeney took office. It takes time to find the right guy.

If Sweeney makes it through the extension — and succeeds in withstanding the fandom’s wrath — he will have completed 13 years on the job, dating to 2015. He’ll also be on the verge of his 62nd birthday, as well as some 44 years removed from the 1984 draft, when the Bruins culled him out of the eighth round, pick No. 166.

If the Bruins during Sweeney’s decision-making tenure routinely, or even occasionally, unearthed such gems hidden so late in the draft, oh how different might the narrative be pertaining to his front office legacy.

A decade into Sweeney’s shot-calling tour, the draft, the draft, the draft remains the biggest smudge on his curriculum vitae, and the one that ultimately could bump him off the job in these next 36 months. Which is to say, in part, he needs to make a score with that No. 7 pickcurrently in his pocket.

Far more relevant to Sweeney’s immediate future as clerk of the works is that coaching decision, along with how he builds out the roster this summer — be it by trades and/or free agency. Those are the underlying factors that will determine his success and, most likely, his legacy.

The bigger surprise Tuesday, by the view here from high up in the courtside ref’s chair, was the degree of negative fan reaction over the extension. Really, folks, what were you thinking? What did you think was going to happen?

CEO Charlie Jacobs and Neely, in the end-of-season autopsy five weeks ago, granted Sweeney the gold card to move the franchise forward. They framed it by saying he earned the opportunity, through past work, to make the necessary fixes. Neely that day said he would need time to consider extending Sweeney, but c‘mon, as sure as water freezes at 32 degrees, the former defenseman who wore No. 32 had that extension iced before he ambled to the podium late on the morning of April 23. Keeping meant extending him.

Again, the coach is nonexistent. The player talent is too spotty, uneven. The fan base is frayed, their loyalty worn thinner than their wallets, which they’ve been asked to open wider yet again to cover the average 13 percent season-ticket price hike over these last two seasons. (Remember, those usury-like utility bills!)

Once the decision was made to retain Sweeney as Mr. Fix-It, the extension was a fait accompli. It was formalized Tuesday in order to get him out there and nail down a coach, and then to convince free agents, mulling packages worth in the tens of millions of dollars, that Boston is the place to play, raise families, maybe win the Stanley Cup.

They already gave Sweeney the job, and assured everyone he was their guy. They had no choice but to put him in position to make good.
Who is Jim McBride ?
 
The majority of folks on here would prefer that they move on from Sweeney, but what's hilarious is that between Sweeney and Neely, Sweeney would get another job immediately if he got fired. Remember, even Peter Chiarelli got scooped up quickly after he got canned. GM's in the NHL are recycled like soda cans. I'd be absolutely stunned if any team gave Neely a job if by some miracle he got canned. He has proven to be too emotional and a mediocre (and that's being kind) talent evaluator. Outside of acting like a maniac when the team scores a goal, I'm really not sure what, if anything, he actually does.
I loved that when he first started doing that. Now...
 
So if the team had perfect health they would have been a 7th or 8th seed?

That still not a good roster if you are depending on perfectly health to barely make the playoffs.

Also funny to see all these coaches leave us and do better with other teams.

It is becoming very apparent that the coaches haven’t been the issue.
I'm still glad they got rid of Sunny Jim.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PatriceBergeronFan
He would be worth a look under the hood. I have to say that for all the crap the Maple Leafs take for their playoff failures, do the Canes deserve as much criticisms, they have been a major disappointment.
That appears to be true.

They have lost three consecutive Eastern conference finals under RB.

If they lose yet another conference final, as appears likely at this point, Carolina will probably look elsewhere for a head coach next season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PatriceBergeronFan
Montgomery just turned around a reeling blues team that was out of the playoffs and helped get them in.
Yes, but that is St Louis, s team constructed for a coach like Montgomery.

Whatever else is true, he did not like the roster Sweeney put together and more or less gave up on them.

With a wink and a nod, back to St louis.

What a guy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PatriceBergeronFan
That appears to be true.

They have lost three consecutive Eastern conference finals under RB.

If they lose yet another conference final, as appears likely at this point, Carolina will probably look elsewhere for a head coach next season.
Question, did he not just sign a contract last year, not sure if I am right?
 
Yes, but that is St Louis, s team constructed for a coach like Montgomery.

Whatever else is true, he did not like the roster Sweeney put together and more or less gave up on them.

With a wink and a nod, back to St louis.

What a guy.
I guess giving him a roster that set NHL regular season records wasn't good enough for him. He sucked when it mattered.

He is a garbage coach and will fail in St Louis as well.

Bruins gave that looser another chance only to be Fkd over by him.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad