Value of: Dominik Kubalik

[Blackhawkswincup]

With Hawks a dumpster fire on ice and with this years 1st likely going to Columbus (As last years + Boqvist did in Jones trade) the Hawks need to acquire assets for rebuilding around a core of Jones , Debrincat and Dach longterm

To me Kubalik is the most realistic piece to move and also the most valuable to net a quality trade package among players likely available

Just turned 26 yrs old before preseason and is RFA in offseason

Thoughts on value of Kubalik?

Click to read more...

 

[samsagat]

If I was the Hawks, I would keep him.

He's not old and he's efficient in terms of production/$$.

Instead, they should move on from their veterans who were the core of their past successes: Kane, Toews and cie...

Just like TB did with Lecavalier and St-Louis, they then started to rebuild a new identity...

 

[Vinman88]

Alexis Heponiemi and 2022 3rd

 

[Artorius Horus T]

Alexis Heponiemi and 2022 3rd

DEAL!. No backsies.

 

[thesaadfather]

Alexis Heponiemi and 2022 3rd

Well, how could anyone say no to that?

 

[Get North]

Canucks could use a big goal scoring winger. They can offer any prospect/pick really, because Kubalik is valuable for 5~ years. Prospects like Jurmo, Woo, Lockwood and 2nd/3rd rounders is up for grabs. Take Pearson too.

Kubalik isn't the type that deserves a 1st. Especially since he's up for a raise if he plays well.

 

[Sinbad]

Canucks could use a big goal scoring winger. They can offer any prospect/pick really, because Kubalik is valuable for 5~ years. Prospects like Jurmo, Woo, Lockwood and 2nd/3rd rounders is up for grabs. Take Pearson too.

Kubalik isn't the type that deserves a 1st. Especially since he's up for a raise if he plays well.

So if he plays well you would have a hard time giving him a raise!? If you think he will play well for your team then a 1st shouldn’t be too much to trade and a raise would be warranted. Especially if he “is valuable for 5 years”.

 

[thesaadfather]

Canucks could use a big goal scoring winger. They can offer any prospect/pick really, because Kubalik is valuable for 5~ years. Prospects like Jurmo, Woo, Lockwood and 2nd/3rd rounders is up for grabs. Take Pearson too.

Kubalik isn't the type that deserves a 1st. Especially since he's up for a raise if he plays well.

He’s a top six goalscorer, and he’s an RFA. He’s worth a 1st + pretty easily. Nothing you mentioned in your post is in the the same stratosphere of value.

 

[Hockey 4 Life]

From the leafs id offer 2022 1st, 2023 2nd, Justin Holl, Nick Ritchie for Kubalik.

 

[Gurglesons]

From the leafs id offer 2022 1st, 2023 2nd, Justin Holl, Nick Ritchie for Kubalik.

What the f***?

 

[Hockey 4 Life]

What the f***?

Holl + Ritchie could be flipped for assets as well.

 

[Kaners PPGs]

Holl + Ritchie could be flipped for assets as well.

From listening to the recent Toronto podcast on the Athletic, they speculated that they would have to be given away if Toronto wanted to add salary.

 

[Gurglesons]

Holl + Ritchie could be flipped for assets as well.

Just seems like an insane overpayment.

 

[Perennial]

From the leafs id offer 2022 1st, 2023 2nd, Justin Holl, Nick Ritchie for Kubalik.

He'd be a good get for the Leafs, but can they afford to re-sign him this summer?

 

[Legion34]

From listening to the recent Toronto podcast on the Athletic, they speculated that they would have to be given away if Toronto wanted to add salary.

???? who?

 

[Bevans]

What the f***?

I wouldn't take that if I were the Hawks.

Kubalik as an RFA is an easy 1st +.
No need to take on a couple bodies to get it done.

For example I'd argue that kubalik is more valuable at deadline than Coleman was.

 

[Gurglesons]

I wouldn't take that if I were the Hawks.

Kubalik as an RFA is an easy 1st +.
No need to take on a couple bodies to get it done.

For example I'd argue that kubalik is more valuable at deadline than Coleman was.

Well, that’d be a stupid argument.

 

[Bevans]

Well, that’d be a stupid argument.

Contract controlled players who have paced 31 goals a season across their careers aren't for everyone.

 

[Eggtimer]

Devils really need a shooting forward for their league worst PP.
Holtz looks like he can be one but he is working on other parts of his game plus we need more than just Holtz.
What , if anything , would the Hawks want from NJ for Kubalik?
I always wanted him of Olofsson from the Sabres as a PP winger. Those two are relatively young and shouldn’t cost an insane amount of assets.

 

[Gurglesons]

Contract controlled players who have paced 31 goals across their careers aren't for everyone.

I don’t see how Kubalik has more value than Coleman, but I’ll be honest I do not watch the Hawks regularly.

In the games I’ve seen from him he’s strikes me as a floater.

 

[Chayos]

Well, that’d be a stupid argument.

I think Kubalik is worth even if he was a UFA let alone being a RFA. The ask for a first is reasonable given his goal scoring.

 

[varano]

From the leafs id offer 2022 1st, 2023 2nd, Justin Holl, Nick Ritchie for Kubalik.

Really..... I wouldnt.

 

[Bevans]

I don’t see how Kulablik has more value than Coleman, but I’ll be honest I do not watch the Hawks regularly.

Hes younger than Coleman was at the time. RFA status is very valuable.

I'm the biggest Coleman fan you'll meet. But a 30 goal (pace) scorer with RFA status is more valuable.

 

[East Coast Icestyle]

I wouldn't take that if I were the Hawks.

Kubalik as an RFA is an easy 1st +.
No need to take on a couple bodies to get it done.

For example I'd argue that kubalik is more valuable at deadline than Coleman was.

Coleman was a ufa and Kubalik is an rfa. The intent with ANY team would be to resign him and given the cap landscape I'd think bodies would go the other way from literally every team that would want him.

 

[Bevans]

Coleman was a ufa and Kubalik is an rfa. The intent with ANY team would be to resign him and given the cap landscape I'd think bodies would go the other way from literally every team that would want him.

Then you gotta pay em to bury the bodies.

I think you'll find outside of Toronto that holl and Ritchie aren't particularly desirable.

Plus Hawks will be retaining salary which will require even more premium.

I think a 50% retained kubalik return would shock posters.